Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

New Journal of Physics

Geometric phase in beating of light waves

Antti Hannonen, Kimmo Saastamoinen, Lasse-Petteri Leppänen, Matias Koivurova, Andriy Shevchenko, Ari T. Friberg, Tero Setälä

Published Jul 31, 2019• 19 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract Beating is a simple physical phenomenon known for long in the context of sound waves but remained surprisingly unexplored for light waves. When two monochromatic optical beams of different frequencies and states of polarization interfere, the polarization state of the superposition field exhibits temporal periodic variation—polarization beating. In this work, we reveal a foundational and elegant phase structure underlying such polarization beating. We show that the phase difference over a single beating period decomposes into the Pancharatnam–Berry geometric phase and a dynamical phase of which the former depends exclusively on the intensities and polarization states of the interfering beams whereas the sum of the phases is determined solely by the beam frequencies. Varying the intensity and polarization characteristics of the beams, the relative contributions of the geometric and dynamical phases can be adjusted. The geometric phase inherent in polarization beating is governed by a compact expression containing only the Stokes parameters of the interfering waves and can alternatively be obtained from the individual beam intensities and the amplitude of the intensity beats. We demonstrate both approaches experimentally by using an interferometer with a fast detector and a specific polarimetric arrangement. Polarization beating has a unique character that the geometric and dynamical phases are entangled, i.e. variation in one unavoidably leads to a change in the other. Our work expands geometric phases into a new domain and offers important novel insight into the role of polarization in interference of electromagnetic waves.

DOI
10.1088/1367-2630/ab3740

Related papers

Pancharatnam-Berry phase in electromagnetic double-pinhole interference

Antti Hannonen, Henri Partanen, Jani Tervo +2 more

Young's two-beam interference and the Pancharatnam-Berry geometric phase constitute two landmark results in optical physics. Employing the spectral interference law of electromagnetic waves, we establish a general expression for the Pancharatnam-Berry phase in Young's two-pinhole setup. We show that the phase is elegantly specified by the electric field Stokes parameters at the openings. The geometric phase can also be deduced from the interference pattern using Pancharatnam's definition of the generalized phase, as we demonstrate both numerically and experimentally. Our results imply a way to control the phase differences in two-beam electromagnetic interference by adjusting the input-field intensities and polarization states.

Physical Review A•May 20, 2019•18 citations

Pancharatnam’s connection and geometric phase of partially polarized light

Kaisa Rantaeskola, Kimmo Saastamoinen, Andreas Norrman +3 more

We extend the concepts of Pancharatnam’s connection and phase difference of optical beams to cover random, stationary, partially polarized quasimonochromatic light. The geometric and dynamic structures of the phase are assessed within the framework of classical statistical polarization theory when the beam undergoes a cyclic, unitary polarization-state evolution. The existence of the two phase types is confirmed experimentally by conducting an interferometric measurement where the phase changes are found from the variations in the position of an intensity fringe pattern. The formalism also leads to a definition of the geometric phase for partially polarized beams, which is consistent with the results on mixed (qubit) quantum states.

Optica•Nov 26, 2024•1 citation

Measurement of intensity and polarization beatings in the interference of independent optical fields

Andriy Shevchenko, Tero Setälä

In this work, interference of independent polychromatic waves with different center frequencies and polarizations is studied experimentally using intensity interferometry and two-photon detection. The intensity and polarization beatings of such interfering waves depend on the wave spectra and fluctuation statistics. The authors introduce an experimental technique to characterize the beating harmonicity time and the randomness of the polarization beating for light beams obeying Gaussian and/or Poissonian statistics.

Physical Review Research•Mar 5, 2020•3 citations

Noncyclic continuous Pancharatnam—Berry phase in dual-beam interference

Aleksi Leinonen, Antti Hannonen, Henri Partanen +4 more

Abstract The geometric phase for classical electromagnetic light beams, in its original formulation as introduced by Pancharatnam, concerns fields experiencing cyclic, discrete in-phase polarization-state changes. A similar phase was later recognized by Berry to govern the behavior of adiabatic quantum systems, with consequent extensions to nonadiabatic and noncyclic evolutions of the quantum state. However, no optical counterpart for the noncyclic, adiabatic (continuous) evolution has been demonstrated. Here we employ a modified Young’s two-pinhole setup with controlled pinhole polarizations and intensities to generate on interference an arbitrary continuous spatial evolution of the polarization state, an optical analogue to the adiabatic case. The customized arrangement allows separating at any point the accumulated dynamical and geometric phases from the total phase, enabling a detailed study of the noncyclic Pancharatnam–Berry phase in a continuous transformation. Our theoretical and experimental results are in excellent agreement and consistent with the geodesic rule for noncyclic evolutions.

Communications Physics•Jun 7, 2023•18 citations

Measurement of the Pancharatnam–Berry phase in two-beam interference

Antti Hannonen, Henri Partanen, Aleksi Leinonen +4 more

Young’s dual-pinhole interference experiment with arbitrary fully correlated and polarized vector light fields leads to a Pancharatnam–Berry geometric phase that is related to the associated dynamical phase. We demonstrate theoretically and experimentally how the dynamical phase across the interference pattern can be deciphered from the total phase, thereby leaving only the geometric phase. Our results constitute the first genuine interferometric phase measurements that yield the Pancharatnam–Berry geometric phase in Young’s two-beam interference setup.

Optica•Sep 10, 2020•26 citations

Polarization and geometric phase effects in quantum and classical light interference

Elvis Pillinen

This thesis concerns the role of polarization, coherence, and geometric phase in both quantum and classical light interference.In the quantum domain, the thesis analyzes vector-light interference in a doubleslit geometry for single-photon and multiphoton states.Using a coherence Stokes formalism, a unified description of polarization modulation, geometric phase, and wave-particle duality is established.Single-photon interference is shown to exhibit a fundamental complementarity relation that directly links the geometric phase at the observation screen to which-path information at the slits.This framework is further extended to higher-order interference of multimode N00N states, where Nth-order polarization modulation and geometric-phase accumulation scale linearly with photon number and lead to new higher-order vector-light complementarity relations.In the classical domain, the thesis explores beam and pulse shaping enabled by polarization gratings.Spatial polarization gratings are shown to provide control over the profiles, coherence, diffraction orders, and polarization of partially coherent and partially polarized pulsed beams.The analysis is further extended to ultrafast pulse shaping, where spectral polarization gratings generate multiple temporally shifted pulses with distinct polarization states.Furthermore, a novel Poincaré pulse in the spatiospectral domain is presented.

•Sep 23, 2026•0 citations
Abstract Beating is a simple physical phenomenon known for long in the context of sound waves but remained surprisingly unexplored for light waves. When two monochromatic optical beams of different frequencies and states of polarization interfere, the polarization state of the superposition field exhibits temporal periodic variation—polarization beating. In this work, we reveal a foundational and elegant phase structure underlying such polarization beating. We show that the phase difference over a single beating period decomposes into the Pancharatnam–Berry geometric phase and a dynamical phase of which the former depends exclusively on the intensities and polarization states of the interfering beams whereas the sum of the phases is determined solely by the beam frequencies. Varying the intensity and polarization characteristics of the beams, the relative contributions of the geometric and dynamical phases can be adjusted. The geometric phase inherent in polarization beating is governed by a compact expression containing only the Stokes parameters of the interfering waves and can alternatively be obtained from the individual beam intensities and the amplitude of the intensity beats. We demonstrate both approaches experimentally by using an interferometer with a fast detector and a specific polarimetric arrangement. Polarization beating has a unique character that the geometric and dynamical phases are entangled, i.e. variation in one unavoidably leads to a change in the other. Our work expands geometric phases into a new domain and offers important novel insight into the role of polarization in interference of electromagnetic waves.
Young's two-beam interference and the Pancharatnam-Berry geometric phase constitute two landmark results in optical physics. Employing the spectral interference law of electromagnetic waves, we establish a general expression for the Pancharatnam-Berry phase in Young's two-pinhole setup. We show that the phase is elegantly specified by the electric field Stokes parameters at the openings. The geometric phase can also be deduced from the interference pattern using Pancharatnam's definition of the generalized phase, as we demonstrate both numerically and experimentally. Our results imply a way to control the phase differences in two-beam electromagnetic interference by adjusting the input-field intensities and polarization states.
We extend the concepts of Pancharatnam’s connection and phase difference of optical beams to cover random, stationary, partially polarized quasimonochromatic light. The geometric and dynamic structures of the phase are assessed within the framework of classical statistical polarization theory when the beam undergoes a cyclic, unitary polarization-state evolution. The existence of the two phase types is confirmed experimentally by conducting an interferometric measurement where the phase changes are found from the variations in the position of an intensity fringe pattern. The formalism also leads to a definition of the geometric phase for partially polarized beams, which is consistent with the results on mixed (qubit) quantum states.
In this work, interference of independent polychromatic waves with different center frequencies and polarizations is studied experimentally using intensity interferometry and two-photon detection. The intensity and polarization beatings of such interfering waves depend on the wave spectra and fluctuation statistics. The authors introduce an experimental technique to characterize the beating harmonicity time and the randomness of the polarization beating for light beams obeying Gaussian and/or Poissonian statistics.
Abstract The geometric phase for classical electromagnetic light beams, in its original formulation as introduced by Pancharatnam, concerns fields experiencing cyclic, discrete in-phase polarization-state changes. A similar phase was later recognized by Berry to govern the behavior of adiabatic quantum systems, with consequent extensions to nonadiabatic and noncyclic evolutions of the quantum state. However, no optical counterpart for the noncyclic, adiabatic (continuous) evolution has been demonstrated. Here we employ a modified Young’s two-pinhole setup with controlled pinhole polarizations and intensities to generate on interference an arbitrary continuous spatial evolution of the polarization state, an optical analogue to the adiabatic case. The customized arrangement allows separating at any point the accumulated dynamical and geometric phases from the total phase, enabling a detailed study of the noncyclic Pancharatnam–Berry phase in a continuous transformation. Our theoretical and experimental results are in excellent agreement and consistent with the geodesic rule for noncyclic evolutions.
Young’s dual-pinhole interference experiment with arbitrary fully correlated and polarized vector light fields leads to a Pancharatnam–Berry geometric phase that is related to the associated dynamical phase. We demonstrate theoretically and experimentally how the dynamical phase across the interference pattern can be deciphered from the total phase, thereby leaving only the geometric phase. Our results constitute the first genuine interferometric phase measurements that yield the Pancharatnam–Berry geometric phase in Young’s two-beam interference setup.
This thesis concerns the role of polarization, coherence, and geometric phase in both quantum and classical light interference.In the quantum domain, the thesis analyzes vector-light interference in a doubleslit geometry for single-photon and multiphoton states.Using a coherence Stokes formalism, a unified description of polarization modulation, geometric phase, and wave-particle duality is established.Single-photon interference is shown to exhibit a fundamental complementarity relation that directly links the geometric phase at the observation screen to which-path information at the slits.This framework is further extended to higher-order interference of multimode N00N states, where Nth-order polarization modulation and geometric-phase accumulation scale linearly with photon number and lead to new higher-order vector-light complementarity relations.In the classical domain, the thesis explores beam and pulse shaping enabled by polarization gratings.Spatial polarization gratings are shown to provide control over the profiles, coherence, diffraction orders, and polarization of partially coherent and partially polarized pulsed beams.The analysis is further extended to ultrafast pulse shaping, where spectral polarization gratings generate multiple temporally shifted pulses with distinct polarization states.Furthermore, a novel Poincaré pulse in the spatiospectral domain is presented.