Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Optica

Measurement of the Pancharatnam–Berry phase in two-beam interference

Antti Hannonen, Henri Partanen, Aleksi Leinonen, Janne I. Heikkinen, Tommi K. Hakala, Ari T. Friberg, Tero Setälä

Published Sep 10, 2020• 26 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Young’s dual-pinhole interference experiment with arbitrary fully correlated and polarized vector light fields leads to a Pancharatnam–Berry geometric phase that is related to the associated dynamical phase. We demonstrate theoretically and experimentally how the dynamical phase across the interference pattern can be deciphered from the total phase, thereby leaving only the geometric phase. Our results constitute the first genuine interferometric phase measurements that yield the Pancharatnam–Berry geometric phase in Young’s two-beam interference setup.

DOI
10.1364/optica.401993

Related papers

Pancharatnam-Berry phase in electromagnetic double-pinhole interference

Antti Hannonen, Henri Partanen, Jani Tervo +2 more

Young's two-beam interference and the Pancharatnam-Berry geometric phase constitute two landmark results in optical physics. Employing the spectral interference law of electromagnetic waves, we establish a general expression for the Pancharatnam-Berry phase in Young's two-pinhole setup. We show that the phase is elegantly specified by the electric field Stokes parameters at the openings. The geometric phase can also be deduced from the interference pattern using Pancharatnam's definition of the generalized phase, as we demonstrate both numerically and experimentally. Our results imply a way to control the phase differences in two-beam electromagnetic interference by adjusting the input-field intensities and polarization states.

Physical Review A•May 20, 2019•18 citations

Electromagnetic Coherence and Pancharatnam-Berry Phase in Young’s Interference Experiment

Ari T. Friberg, Jani Tervo, Tero Setälä

The spectral interference law is used to derive the electromagnetic degree of coherence and the Pancharatnam-Berry phase in Young’s two-pinhole setup. The phase has a straightforward connection to the Stokes parameters at the openings.

The Rochester Conferences on Coherence and Quantum Optics and the Quantum Information and Measurement meeting•Jan 1, 2007•0 citations

Young's Interference Experiment Reloaded

Ari T. Friberg, Jani Tervo, Tero Setälä +3 more

An electromagnetic Young's interference experiment is considered with arbitrary, spectrally partially coherent and partially polarized electric fields at the pinholes. Any correlations that exist at the openings lead to modulations of the Stokes parameters on the observation screen. The electromagnetic degree of coherence can be viewed, in direct analogy to the usual scalar case, as a measure of the modulation contrasts of not just the optical intensity but also the polarization state. The electromagnetic degree of coherence can be obtained experimentally via four visibility measurements using appropriate wave plates. If the field at the pinholes is fully polarized, a periodic variation of the polarization state appears on the observation screen, leading to a Pancharatnam–Berry phase. It is shown that this geometric phase has a straightforward but elegant relationship to the Stokes parameters at the pinholes.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2007•2 citations

Noncyclic continuous Pancharatnam—Berry phase in dual-beam interference

Aleksi Leinonen, Antti Hannonen, Henri Partanen +4 more

Abstract The geometric phase for classical electromagnetic light beams, in its original formulation as introduced by Pancharatnam, concerns fields experiencing cyclic, discrete in-phase polarization-state changes. A similar phase was later recognized by Berry to govern the behavior of adiabatic quantum systems, with consequent extensions to nonadiabatic and noncyclic evolutions of the quantum state. However, no optical counterpart for the noncyclic, adiabatic (continuous) evolution has been demonstrated. Here we employ a modified Young’s two-pinhole setup with controlled pinhole polarizations and intensities to generate on interference an arbitrary continuous spatial evolution of the polarization state, an optical analogue to the adiabatic case. The customized arrangement allows separating at any point the accumulated dynamical and geometric phases from the total phase, enabling a detailed study of the noncyclic Pancharatnam–Berry phase in a continuous transformation. Our theoretical and experimental results are in excellent agreement and consistent with the geodesic rule for noncyclic evolutions.

Communications Physics•Jun 7, 2023•18 citations

Experimental demonstration of a non-local Pancharatnam phase in intensity interferometry

Anthony Martin, Olivier Alibart, Jean-Christophe Flesch +4 more

The geometric phase was first anticipated 1956 by Pancharatnam, in the context of polarised light. Much later, in 1984, Berry made an analogue discovery, but this time in the context of quantum mechanics. It turns our that the geometric phase, or Berry's phase, or the Pancharatnam phase, is a very general phenomenon. It is a phase shift that can be acquired by a system, when it has undergone a adiabatic process, bringing it back to its original initial conditions. If the parameter space of the involved Hamiltonian is curved, the final condition may involve a phase change. This effect has been demonstrated in a range of different interferometry experiments. Although the Pancharatnam phase has been seen, this has always been in studies involving the first order correlation, g(1), this is in the intereferogramm of two or more wave amplitudes. Here, we demonstrate experimental proofs of the effect of the Pancharatnam phase in intensity interferometry, or in other words, where the second order correlation factor g(2) is the relevant description of the interference.

•Nov 23, 2011•0 citations

Pancharatnam’s connection and geometric phase of partially polarized light

Kaisa Rantaeskola, Kimmo Saastamoinen, Andreas Norrman +3 more

We extend the concepts of Pancharatnam’s connection and phase difference of optical beams to cover random, stationary, partially polarized quasimonochromatic light. The geometric and dynamic structures of the phase are assessed within the framework of classical statistical polarization theory when the beam undergoes a cyclic, unitary polarization-state evolution. The existence of the two phase types is confirmed experimentally by conducting an interferometric measurement where the phase changes are found from the variations in the position of an intensity fringe pattern. The formalism also leads to a definition of the geometric phase for partially polarized beams, which is consistent with the results on mixed (qubit) quantum states.

Optica•Nov 26, 2024•1 citation
Young’s dual-pinhole interference experiment with arbitrary fully correlated and polarized vector light fields leads to a Pancharatnam–Berry geometric phase that is related to the associated dynamical phase. We demonstrate theoretically and experimentally how the dynamical phase across the interference pattern can be deciphered from the total phase, thereby leaving only the geometric phase. Our results constitute the first genuine interferometric phase measurements that yield the Pancharatnam–Berry geometric phase in Young’s two-beam interference setup.
Young's two-beam interference and the Pancharatnam-Berry geometric phase constitute two landmark results in optical physics. Employing the spectral interference law of electromagnetic waves, we establish a general expression for the Pancharatnam-Berry phase in Young's two-pinhole setup. We show that the phase is elegantly specified by the electric field Stokes parameters at the openings. The geometric phase can also be deduced from the interference pattern using Pancharatnam's definition of the generalized phase, as we demonstrate both numerically and experimentally. Our results imply a way to control the phase differences in two-beam electromagnetic interference by adjusting the input-field intensities and polarization states.
An electromagnetic Young's interference experiment is considered with arbitrary, spectrally partially coherent and partially polarized electric fields at the pinholes. Any correlations that exist at the openings lead to modulations of the Stokes parameters on the observation screen. The electromagnetic degree of coherence can be viewed, in direct analogy to the usual scalar case, as a measure of the modulation contrasts of not just the optical intensity but also the polarization state. The electromagnetic degree of coherence can be obtained experimentally via four visibility measurements using appropriate wave plates. If the field at the pinholes is fully polarized, a periodic variation of the polarization state appears on the observation screen, leading to a Pancharatnam–Berry phase. It is shown that this geometric phase has a straightforward but elegant relationship to the Stokes parameters at the pinholes.
Abstract The geometric phase for classical electromagnetic light beams, in its original formulation as introduced by Pancharatnam, concerns fields experiencing cyclic, discrete in-phase polarization-state changes. A similar phase was later recognized by Berry to govern the behavior of adiabatic quantum systems, with consequent extensions to nonadiabatic and noncyclic evolutions of the quantum state. However, no optical counterpart for the noncyclic, adiabatic (continuous) evolution has been demonstrated. Here we employ a modified Young’s two-pinhole setup with controlled pinhole polarizations and intensities to generate on interference an arbitrary continuous spatial evolution of the polarization state, an optical analogue to the adiabatic case. The customized arrangement allows separating at any point the accumulated dynamical and geometric phases from the total phase, enabling a detailed study of the noncyclic Pancharatnam–Berry phase in a continuous transformation. Our theoretical and experimental results are in excellent agreement and consistent with the geodesic rule for noncyclic evolutions.
The geometric phase was first anticipated 1956 by Pancharatnam, in the context of polarised light. Much later, in 1984, Berry made an analogue discovery, but this time in the context of quantum mechanics. It turns our that the geometric phase, or Berry's phase, or the Pancharatnam phase, is a very general phenomenon. It is a phase shift that can be acquired by a system, when it has undergone a adiabatic process, bringing it back to its original initial conditions. If the parameter space of the involved Hamiltonian is curved, the final condition may involve a phase change. This effect has been demonstrated in a range of different interferometry experiments. Although the Pancharatnam phase has been seen, this has always been in studies involving the first order correlation, g(1), this is in the intereferogramm of two or more wave amplitudes. Here, we demonstrate experimental proofs of the effect of the Pancharatnam phase in intensity interferometry, or in other words, where the second order correlation factor g(2) is the relevant description of the interference.
We extend the concepts of Pancharatnam’s connection and phase difference of optical beams to cover random, stationary, partially polarized quasimonochromatic light. The geometric and dynamic structures of the phase are assessed within the framework of classical statistical polarization theory when the beam undergoes a cyclic, unitary polarization-state evolution. The existence of the two phase types is confirmed experimentally by conducting an interferometric measurement where the phase changes are found from the variations in the position of an intensity fringe pattern. The formalism also leads to a definition of the geometric phase for partially polarized beams, which is consistent with the results on mixed (qubit) quantum states.