Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)

Secure and Robust Identification via Classical-Quantum Channels

Holger Boche, Christian Deppe, Andreas Winter

Published Jun 1, 2018• 4 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We study the identification capacity of classical-quantum channels (“cq-channels”), under channel uncertainty and privacy constraints. To be precise, we consider first compound memoryless cq-channels and determine their identification capacity; then we add an eavesdropper, considering compound memoryless wiretap cqq-channels, and determine their secret identification capacity. In the first case (without privacy), we find the identification capacity always equal to the transmission capacity. In the second case, we find a dichotomy: either the secrecy capacity (also known as private capacity) of the channel is zero, and then also the secrecy identification capacity is zero, or the secrecy capacity is positive and then the secrecy identification capacity equals the transmission capacity of the main channel without the wiretapper. We perform the same analysis for the case of arbitrarily varying wiretap cqq-channels (cqq-AVWC), with analogous findings, and make several observations regarding the continuity and super-additivity of the identification capacity in the latter case.

DOI
10.1109/isit.2018.8437893

Related papers

Secure and Robust Identification via Classical-Quantum Channels

Holger Boche, Christian Deppe, Andreas Winter

We study the identification capacity of classical-quantum channels (“cq-channels”) under channel uncertainty and privacy constraints. To be precise, we first consider compound memoryless cq-channels and determine their identification capacity; then we add an eavesdropper by considering compound memoryless wiretap cqq-channels, and determine their secret identification capacity. In the first case (without privacy), we find the identification capacity always equal to the transmission capacity. In the second case, we find a dichotomy: either the secrecy capacity (also known as private capacity) of the channel is zero, and then the secrecy identification capacity is also zero, or the secrecy capacity is positive and then the secrecy identification capacity equals the transmission capacity of the main channel without the wiretapper. We perform the same analysis for the case of arbitrarily varying wiretap cqq-channels (cqq-AVWC) with analogous findings, and make several observations regarding the continuity and super-additivity of the identification capacity in the latter case.

arXiv:1801.09967•IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Jun 5, 2019•24 citations

Secure Identification for Wiretap Channels; Robustness, Super-Additivity and Continuity

Holger Boche, Christian Deppe

We determine the identification capacity of compound channels in the presence of a wiretapper. It turns out that the secure identification capacity formula fulfills a dichotomy theorem: It is positive and equals the identification capacity of the channel if its message transmission secrecy capacity is positive. Otherwise, the secure identification capacity is zero. Thus, we show in the case that the secure identification capacity is greater than zero we do not pay a price for secure identification, i.e., the secure identification capacity is equal to the identification capacity. This is in strong contrast to the transmission capacity of the compound wiretap channel. We then use this characterization to investigate the analytic behavior of the secure identification capacity. In particular, it is practically relevant to investigate its continuity behavior as a function of the channels. We completely characterize this continuity behavior. We analyze the (dis-) continuity and (super-) additivity of the capacities. In 1998, N. Alon gave a conjecture about maximal violation for the additivity of capacity functions in graphs. We show that this maximal violation as well holds for the secure identification capacity of compound wiretap channels. This is the first example of a capacity function exhibiting this behavior.

IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security•Jan 23, 2018•65 citations

Robust and secure identification

Holger Boche, Christian Deppe

We determine the identification capacity of compound channels with and without wiretapper. It turned out, that the secure capacity formula fulfill a dichotomy theorem. It is positive if its secure capacity is positive and equals the transmission capacity of the channel. Otherwise the capacity is zero. We analyze the (dis-)continuity and (super-)additivity of the capacities, which we determined. Alon gave in [6] a conjecture about maximal violation for the additivity for capacity functions. We show that this maximal violation holds for the secure identification capacity. This is the first example of a capacity function, which has this behavior.

IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)•Jun 1, 2017•8 citations

On the Continuity of the Secrecy Capacity of Compound and Arbitrarily Varying Wiretap Channels

Holger Boche, Rafael F. Schaefer, H. Vincent Poor

The wiretap channel models secure communication between two users in the presence of an eavesdropper who must be kept ignorant of transmitted messages. The performance of such a system is usually characterized by its secrecy capacity which determines the maximum transmission rate of secure communication. In this paper, the issue of whether or not the secrecy capacity is a continuous function of the system parameters is examined. In particular, this is done for channel uncertainty modeled via compound channels and arbitrarily varying channels, in which the legitimate users know only that the true channel realization is from a prespecified uncertainty set. In the former model, this realization remains constant for the entire duration of transmission, while in the latter the realization varies from channel use to channel use in an unknown and arbitrary manner. These models not only capture the case of channel uncertainty, but are also suitable for modeling scenarios in which a malicious adversary jams or otherwise influences the legitimate transmission. The secrecy capacity of the compound wiretap channel is shown to be robust in the sense that it is a continuous function of the uncertainty set. Thus, small variations in the uncertainty set lead to small variations in secrecy capacity. On the other hand, the deterministic secrecy capacity of the arbitrarily varying wiretap channel is shown to be discontinuous in the uncertainty set meaning that small variations can lead to dramatic losses in capacity.

arXiv:1409.4752•IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security•Aug 13, 2015•51 citations

Classical-quantum arbitrarily varying wiretap channel—A capacity formula with Ahlswede Dichotomy—Resources

Holger Boche, Minglai Cai, Christian Deppe

We establish the Ahlswede Dichotomy for arbitrarily varying classical-quantum wiretap channels, i.e., either the deterministic secrecy capacity of an arbitrarily varying classical-quantum wiretap channel is zero, or it equals its randomness assisted secrecy capacity. We analyze the secrecy capacity of arbitrarily varying classical-quantum wiretap channels when the sender and the receiver use various resources. It turns out that having randomness, common randomness, and correlation as resources are very helpful for achieving a positive deterministic secrecy capacity of arbitrarily varying classical-quantum wiretap channels. We prove the phenomenon “super-activation” for arbitrarily varying classical-quantum wiretap channels, i.e., two arbitrarily varying classical-quantum wiretap channels, both with zero deterministic secrecy capacity, if used together allow perfect secure transmission.

IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)•Jun 1, 2014•1 citation

The Secrecy Capacity of Compound Gaussian MIMO Wiretap Channels

Rafael F. Schaefer, Sergey L. Loyka

Strong secrecy capacity of compound wiretap channels is studied. The known lower bounds for the secrecy capacity of compound finite-state memoryless channels under discrete alphabets are extended to arbitrary uncertainty sets and continuous alphabets under the strong secrecy criterion. The conditions under which these bounds are tight are given. Under the saddle-point condition, the compound secrecy capacity is shown to be equal to that of the worst-case channel. Based on this, the compound Gaussian multiple-input multiple-output wiretap channel is studied under the spectral norm constraint and without the degradedness assumption. First, it is assumed that only the eavesdropper channel is unknown, but is known to have a bounded spectral norm (maximum channel gain). The compound secrecy capacity is established in a closed form and the optimal signaling is identified. The compound capacity equals the worst-case channel capacity and thus establishing the saddlepoint property; the optimal signaling is Gaussian and on the eigenvectors of the legitimate channel and the worst-case eavesdropper is isotropic. The eigenmode power allocation somewhat resembles the standard water-filling but is not identical to it. More general uncertainty sets are considered and the existence of a maximum element is shown to be sufficient for a saddle-point to exist, so that signaling on the worst-case channel achieves the compound capacity of the whole class of channels. The case of rank-constrained eavesdropper is considered and the respective compound secrecy capacity is established. Subsequently, the case of additive uncertainty in the legitimate channel, in addition to the unknown eavesdropper channel, is studied. Its compound secrecy capacity and the optimal signaling are established in a closed form as well, revealing the same saddle-point property. When a saddle-point exists under strong secrecy, strong and weak secrecy compound capacities are equal.

arXiv:1509.02182•IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Jul 21, 2015•43 citations
We study the identification capacity of classical-quantum channels (“cq-channels”), under channel uncertainty and privacy constraints. To be precise, we consider first compound memoryless cq-channels and determine their identification capacity; then we add an eavesdropper, considering compound memoryless wiretap cqq-channels, and determine their secret identification capacity. In the first case (without privacy), we find the identification capacity always equal to the transmission capacity. In the second case, we find a dichotomy: either the secrecy capacity (also known as private capacity) of the channel is zero, and then also the secrecy identification capacity is zero, or the secrecy capacity is positive and then the secrecy identification capacity equals the transmission capacity of the main channel without the wiretapper. We perform the same analysis for the case of arbitrarily varying wiretap cqq-channels (cqq-AVWC), with analogous findings, and make several observations regarding the continuity and super-additivity of the identification capacity in the latter case.
We study the identification capacity of classical-quantum channels (“cq-channels”) under channel uncertainty and privacy constraints. To be precise, we first consider compound memoryless cq-channels and determine their identification capacity; then we add an eavesdropper by considering compound memoryless wiretap cqq-channels, and determine their secret identification capacity. In the first case (without privacy), we find the identification capacity always equal to the transmission capacity. In the second case, we find a dichotomy: either the secrecy capacity (also known as private capacity) of the channel is zero, and then the secrecy identification capacity is also zero, or the secrecy capacity is positive and then the secrecy identification capacity equals the transmission capacity of the main channel without the wiretapper. We perform the same analysis for the case of arbitrarily varying wiretap cqq-channels (cqq-AVWC) with analogous findings, and make several observations regarding the continuity and super-additivity of the identification capacity in the latter case.
We determine the identification capacity of compound channels in the presence of a wiretapper. It turns out that the secure identification capacity formula fulfills a dichotomy theorem: It is positive and equals the identification capacity of the channel if its message transmission secrecy capacity is positive. Otherwise, the secure identification capacity is zero. Thus, we show in the case that the secure identification capacity is greater than zero we do not pay a price for secure identification, i.e., the secure identification capacity is equal to the identification capacity. This is in strong contrast to the transmission capacity of the compound wiretap channel. We then use this characterization to investigate the analytic behavior of the secure identification capacity. In particular, it is practically relevant to investigate its continuity behavior as a function of the channels. We completely characterize this continuity behavior. We analyze the (dis-) continuity and (super-) additivity of the capacities. In 1998, N. Alon gave a conjecture about maximal violation for the additivity of capacity functions in graphs. We show that this maximal violation as well holds for the secure identification capacity of compound wiretap channels. This is the first example of a capacity function exhibiting this behavior.
We determine the identification capacity of compound channels with and without wiretapper. It turned out, that the secure capacity formula fulfill a dichotomy theorem. It is positive if its secure capacity is positive and equals the transmission capacity of the channel. Otherwise the capacity is zero. We analyze the (dis-)continuity and (super-)additivity of the capacities, which we determined. Alon gave in [6] a conjecture about maximal violation for the additivity for capacity functions. We show that this maximal violation holds for the secure identification capacity. This is the first example of a capacity function, which has this behavior.
The wiretap channel models secure communication between two users in the presence of an eavesdropper who must be kept ignorant of transmitted messages. The performance of such a system is usually characterized by its secrecy capacity which determines the maximum transmission rate of secure communication. In this paper, the issue of whether or not the secrecy capacity is a continuous function of the system parameters is examined. In particular, this is done for channel uncertainty modeled via compound channels and arbitrarily varying channels, in which the legitimate users know only that the true channel realization is from a prespecified uncertainty set. In the former model, this realization remains constant for the entire duration of transmission, while in the latter the realization varies from channel use to channel use in an unknown and arbitrary manner. These models not only capture the case of channel uncertainty, but are also suitable for modeling scenarios in which a malicious adversary jams or otherwise influences the legitimate transmission. The secrecy capacity of the compound wiretap channel is shown to be robust in the sense that it is a continuous function of the uncertainty set. Thus, small variations in the uncertainty set lead to small variations in secrecy capacity. On the other hand, the deterministic secrecy capacity of the arbitrarily varying wiretap channel is shown to be discontinuous in the uncertainty set meaning that small variations can lead to dramatic losses in capacity.
We establish the Ahlswede Dichotomy for arbitrarily varying classical-quantum wiretap channels, i.e., either the deterministic secrecy capacity of an arbitrarily varying classical-quantum wiretap channel is zero, or it equals its randomness assisted secrecy capacity. We analyze the secrecy capacity of arbitrarily varying classical-quantum wiretap channels when the sender and the receiver use various resources. It turns out that having randomness, common randomness, and correlation as resources are very helpful for achieving a positive deterministic secrecy capacity of arbitrarily varying classical-quantum wiretap channels. We prove the phenomenon “super-activation” for arbitrarily varying classical-quantum wiretap channels, i.e., two arbitrarily varying classical-quantum wiretap channels, both with zero deterministic secrecy capacity, if used together allow perfect secure transmission.
Strong secrecy capacity of compound wiretap channels is studied. The known lower bounds for the secrecy capacity of compound finite-state memoryless channels under discrete alphabets are extended to arbitrary uncertainty sets and continuous alphabets under the strong secrecy criterion. The conditions under which these bounds are tight are given. Under the saddle-point condition, the compound secrecy capacity is shown to be equal to that of the worst-case channel. Based on this, the compound Gaussian multiple-input multiple-output wiretap channel is studied under the spectral norm constraint and without the degradedness assumption. First, it is assumed that only the eavesdropper channel is unknown, but is known to have a bounded spectral norm (maximum channel gain). The compound secrecy capacity is established in a closed form and the optimal signaling is identified. The compound capacity equals the worst-case channel capacity and thus establishing the saddlepoint property; the optimal signaling is Gaussian and on the eigenvectors of the legitimate channel and the worst-case eavesdropper is isotropic. The eigenmode power allocation somewhat resembles the standard water-filling but is not identical to it. More general uncertainty sets are considered and the existence of a maximum element is shown to be sufficient for a saddle-point to exist, so that signaling on the worst-case channel achieves the compound capacity of the whole class of channels. The case of rank-constrained eavesdropper is considered and the respective compound secrecy capacity is established. Subsequently, the case of additive uncertainty in the legitimate channel, in addition to the unknown eavesdropper channel, is studied. Its compound secrecy capacity and the optimal signaling are established in a closed form as well, revealing the same saddle-point property. When a saddle-point exists under strong secrecy, strong and weak secrecy compound capacities are equal.