Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Computing and Combinatorics Conference

Robust Quantum Algorithms with epsilon -Biased Oracles.

Tomoya Suzuki, Shigeru Yamashita, Masaki Nakanishi, Katsumasa Watanabe

Published Jan 1, 2006• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Robust Quantum Algorithms with ε-Biased Oracles

Tomoya Suzuki, Shigeru Yamashita, Masaki Nakanishi +1 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2006•2 citations

Robust Quantum Algorithms Computing OR with ε-Biased Oracles(Quantum Computing, Foundations of Computer Science)

Tomoya Suzuki, Shigeru Yamashita, Masaki Nakanishi +1 more

IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems•Feb 1, 2007•0 citations

Quantum-Advised Algorithms for Biased Oracles

Akinori Kawachi

電子情報通信学会技術研究報告. COMP, コンピュテーション•Mar 3, 2014•0 citations

Quantum Biased Oracles

亮周 河内, Akinori Kawachi

•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations

General Bounds for Quantum Biased Oracles

Kazuo Iwama, Rudy Raymond, Shigeru Yamashita

An oracle with bias ε is an oracle that answers queries correctly with a probability of at least 1/2+ε. In this paper, we study the upper and lower bounds of quantum query complexity of oracles with bias ε. For general upper bounds, we show that for any quantum algorithm solving some problem with high probability using T queries of perfect quantum oracles, i.e., oracles with ε =1/2, there exists a quantum algorithm solving the same problem, also with high probability, using O(T/ε) queries of the corresponding biased quantum oracles. As corollaries we can show robust quantum algorithms and gaps between biased quantum and classical oracles, e.g., by showing a problem where the quantum query complexity is O(N/ε) but the classical query complexity is lower bounded by Ω(N logN/ε2). For general lower bounds, we generalize Ambainis' quantum adversary argument to biased quantum oracles and obtain the first lower bounds with explicit bias factor. As one of its applications we can provide another proof of the optimality of quantum algorithms for the so-called quantum Goldreich-Levin problem which was proved before by Adcock, et al. using different and more complicated methods.

IPSJ Digital Courier•Jan 1, 2005•6 citations

Behavior of Analog Quantum Algorithms.

Lucas Kocia, Lucas T. Brady, Przemysław Bienias +2 more

•Dec 1, 2021•2 citations
An oracle with bias ε is an oracle that answers queries correctly with a probability of at least 1/2+ε. In this paper, we study the upper and lower bounds of quantum query complexity of oracles with bias ε. For general upper bounds, we show that for any quantum algorithm solving some problem with high probability using T queries of perfect quantum oracles, i.e., oracles with ε =1/2, there exists a quantum algorithm solving the same problem, also with high probability, using O(T/ε) queries of the corresponding biased quantum oracles. As corollaries we can show robust quantum algorithms and gaps between biased quantum and classical oracles, e.g., by showing a problem where the quantum query complexity is O(N/ε) but the classical query complexity is lower bounded by Ω(N logN/ε2). For general lower bounds, we generalize Ambainis' quantum adversary argument to biased quantum oracles and obtain the first lower bounds with explicit bias factor. As one of its applications we can provide another proof of the optimality of quantum algorithms for the so-called quantum Goldreich-Levin problem which was proved before by Adcock, et al. using different and more complicated methods.