Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Biased Oracles

亮周 河内, Akinori Kawachi

Published Jan 1, 2005• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Quantum-Advised Algorithms for Biased Oracles

Akinori Kawachi

電子情報通信学会技術研究報告. COMP, コンピュテーション•Mar 3, 2014•0 citations

Query Complexity of Quantum Biased Oracles

Kazuo Iwama, Rudy Raymond, Shigeru Yamashita

Springer eBooks•Jun 15, 2006•1 citation

Random Oracles in a Quantum World

Dan Boneh, Özgür Dagdelen, Marc Fischlin +3 more

arXiv:1008.0931•Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2011•462 citations

Quantum Biased Oracles

Kazuo Iwama, Akinori Kawachi, Shigeru Yamashita

This paper reviews researches on quantum oracle computations when oracles are not perfect, i.e., they may return wrong answers. We call such oracles biased oracles, and discuss the formal model of them. Then we provide an intuitive explanation how quantum search with biased oracles by Høyer, et al.(2003) works. We also review the method, by Buhrman, et al.(2005), to obtain all the answers of a quantum biased oracle without any overhead compared to the perfect oracle case. Moreover, we discuss two special cases of quantum biased oracles and their interesting properties, which are not found in the classical corresponding cases. Our discussion implies that the model of quantum biased oracle adopted by the existing researches is natural.

IPSJ Digital Courier•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations

General Bounds for Quantum Biased Oracles

Kazuo Iwama, Rudy Raymond, Shigeru Yamashita

An oracle with bias ε is an oracle that answers queries correctly with a probability of at least 1/2+ε. In this paper, we study the upper and lower bounds of quantum query complexity of oracles with bias ε. For general upper bounds, we show that for any quantum algorithm solving some problem with high probability using T queries of perfect quantum oracles, i.e., oracles with ε =1/2, there exists a quantum algorithm solving the same problem, also with high probability, using O(T/ε) queries of the corresponding biased quantum oracles. As corollaries we can show robust quantum algorithms and gaps between biased quantum and classical oracles, e.g., by showing a problem where the quantum query complexity is O(N/ε) but the classical query complexity is lower bounded by Ω(N logN/ε2). For general lower bounds, we generalize Ambainis' quantum adversary argument to biased quantum oracles and obtain the first lower bounds with explicit bias factor. As one of its applications we can provide another proof of the optimality of quantum algorithms for the so-called quantum Goldreich-Levin problem which was proved before by Adcock, et al. using different and more complicated methods.

IPSJ Digital Courier•Jan 1, 2005•6 citations

The Quantum Puzzle

Barry R. Clarke

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•May 14, 2015•1 citation
This paper reviews researches on quantum oracle computations when oracles are not perfect, i.e., they may return wrong answers. We call such oracles biased oracles, and discuss the formal model of them. Then we provide an intuitive explanation how quantum search with biased oracles by Høyer, et al.(2003) works. We also review the method, by Buhrman, et al.(2005), to obtain all the answers of a quantum biased oracle without any overhead compared to the perfect oracle case. Moreover, we discuss two special cases of quantum biased oracles and their interesting properties, which are not found in the classical corresponding cases. Our discussion implies that the model of quantum biased oracle adopted by the existing researches is natural.
An oracle with bias ε is an oracle that answers queries correctly with a probability of at least 1/2+ε. In this paper, we study the upper and lower bounds of quantum query complexity of oracles with bias ε. For general upper bounds, we show that for any quantum algorithm solving some problem with high probability using T queries of perfect quantum oracles, i.e., oracles with ε =1/2, there exists a quantum algorithm solving the same problem, also with high probability, using O(T/ε) queries of the corresponding biased quantum oracles. As corollaries we can show robust quantum algorithms and gaps between biased quantum and classical oracles, e.g., by showing a problem where the quantum query complexity is O(N/ε) but the classical query complexity is lower bounded by Ω(N logN/ε2). For general lower bounds, we generalize Ambainis' quantum adversary argument to biased quantum oracles and obtain the first lower bounds with explicit bias factor. As one of its applications we can provide another proof of the optimality of quantum algorithms for the so-called quantum Goldreich-Levin problem which was proved before by Adcock, et al. using different and more complicated methods.