Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

SpringerBriefs in computer science

Conclusion and Further Remarks

Franklin de Lima Marquezino, Renato Portugal, Carlile Lavor

Published Jan 1, 2019• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-19066-8_6

Related papers

Implications and Conclusive Remarks

Aleksandar M. Spasić

Interface science and technology•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations

Conclusion and Future Perspectives

Kashif Ammar Yasir, Wei Liu

Springer series in solid-state sciences•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Reply to Marchildon: absorption and non-unitarity remain well-defined in the Relativistic Transactional Interpretation

Ruth E. Kastner

I rebut some erroneous statements and attempt to clear up some misunderstandings in a recent set of critical remarks by Marchildon regarding the Relativistic Transactional Interpretation (RTI), showing that his negative conclusions regarding the transactional model are ill-founded.

arXiv:1712.09697•Dec 27, 2017•0 citations

Concluding Remarks

H. J. Borchers, Rathindra Nath Sen

Lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

Concluding Remarks

Tzvetan S. Metodi, Frederic T. Chong

Synthesis lectures on computer architecture•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

To estimate a phase via two-entangled photons with multiple passes

R.Q. Liu L.X. Xia

This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we describe the super stable optical interferometer with multiple passes. In Section 3 and 4, we use single photon and two entangled photons to estimate an unknown phase, respectively. Our scheme enables considerable high precision to beat the SQL. And conclusions and remarks are made in Section 4.

CRC Press eBooks•Feb 25, 2015•0 citations