Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Interface science and technology

Implications and Conclusive Remarks

Aleksandar M. Spasić

Published Jan 1, 2018• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/b978-0-12-813836-6.00008-8

Related papers

Conclusions and Philosophical Implications

Ross Barrett, Pier Paolo Delsanto, Angelo Tartaglia

Undergraduate lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 2016•1 citation

Entanglement of particles versus entanglement of fields: Independent quantum resources

Jan Sperling, Elizabeth Agudelo

Nature allows one to explore a manifold of remarkable quantum effects. Most prominently, quantum entanglement can be observed in many-particle systems, between multiple quantized fields, and in hybrid combinations thereof. This diversity, however, also leads to contradicting conclusions about what truly constitutes entanglement in any given physical scenario. By explicitly allowing various perspectives, we rigorously consider different notions of entanglement in the context of first and second quantization. By providing instructive examples, we show that particle entanglement and field entanglement are actually distinct phenomena that can occur and be observed independently of each other. This conclusion not only affects our fundamental understanding but has direct implications for quantum technology which can harness those independent forms of entanglement in practical scenarios.

arXiv:2204.06245•Physical Review A•Apr 17, 2023•4 citations

Historical and Conceptual Remarks

Lecture notes in physics. M, Monographs•Jan 1, 1997•0 citations

Concluding Remarks

Kwangjo Kim

SpringerBriefs in information security and cryptography•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

Renninger's Thought Experiment: Implications for Quantum Ontology and for Quantum Mechanic's Interpretation

Willy De Baere

It is argued that the conclusions obtained by Renninger (Zeitschrift fur Physik 136, 251 (1953)), by means of an interferometer thought experiment, have important implications for a number of still ongoing discussions about quantum mechanics (QM). To these belong the ontology underlying QM, Bohr's complementarity principle, the significance of QM's wave function, the "elements of reality" introduced by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR), and Bohm's version of QM (BQM). A slightly extended setup is used to make a physical prediction at variance with the mathematical prediction of QM. An english translation of Renninger's paper, which was originally published in german language, follows the present paper. This should facilitate access to that remarkable, apparently overlooked and forgotten, paper.

arXiv:quant-ph/0504031•Apr 5, 2005•1 citation

Concluding Remarks

Songbo Xie

Springer theses•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations
Nature allows one to explore a manifold of remarkable quantum effects. Most prominently, quantum entanglement can be observed in many-particle systems, between multiple quantized fields, and in hybrid combinations thereof. This diversity, however, also leads to contradicting conclusions about what truly constitutes entanglement in any given physical scenario. By explicitly allowing various perspectives, we rigorously consider different notions of entanglement in the context of first and second quantization. By providing instructive examples, we show that particle entanglement and field entanglement are actually distinct phenomena that can occur and be observed independently of each other. This conclusion not only affects our fundamental understanding but has direct implications for quantum technology which can harness those independent forms of entanglement in practical scenarios.
It is argued that the conclusions obtained by Renninger (Zeitschrift fur Physik 136, 251 (1953)), by means of an interferometer thought experiment, have important implications for a number of still ongoing discussions about quantum mechanics (QM). To these belong the ontology underlying QM, Bohr's complementarity principle, the significance of QM's wave function, the "elements of reality" introduced by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR), and Bohm's version of QM (BQM). A slightly extended setup is used to make a physical prediction at variance with the mathematical prediction of QM. An english translation of Renninger's paper, which was originally published in german language, follows the present paper. This should facilitate access to that remarkable, apparently overlooked and forgotten, paper.