Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics

Timelike entanglement for delayed-choice entanglement swapping

David Glick

Published Jun 22, 2019• 7 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.06.001

Related papers

Experimental delayed-choice entanglement swapping

Xiao‐Song Ma, Stefan Zotter, Johannes Kofler +4 more

arXiv:1203.4834•Nature Physics•Apr 22, 2012•287 citations

Complementarity and Information in “Delayed-choice for Entanglement Swapping”

Časlav Brukner, Markus Aspelmeyer, Anton Zeilinger

arXiv:quant-ph/0405036•Foundations of Physics•Nov 1, 2005•22 citations

Entanglement and Delayed-choice Quantum Erasure

김재완, 이해웅

New Physics Sae Mulli•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

The Essence of Delayed Choice Entanglement Elimination

Douglas Snyder

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations

Delayed-Choice Experiments and the Metaphysics of Entanglement

Matthias Egg

Foundations of Physics•Aug 20, 2013•15 citations

Delayed-choice entanglement swapping experiments: No evidence for timelike entanglement

Jørn Kløvfjell Mjelva

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the possibility of temporal nonlocality, mirroring the spatial nonlocality supposedly evidenced by the Bell correlations. In this context, Glick (2019) has argued that timelike entanglement and temporal nonlocality is demonstrated in delayed-choice entanglement swapping (DCES) experiments, like that of Ma et al. (2012), Megidish et al. (2013) and Hensen et al. (2015). I will argue that a careful analysis of these experiments shows that they in fact display nothing more than "ordinary" spacelike entanglement, and that any purported timelike entanglement is an artefact of selection bias. Regardless any other reason one may have for challenging the assumption of temporal locality, timelike entanglement as evidenced by these experiments is not among them. I conclude by discussing what lessons on the nature of entanglement might be drawn from an examination of DCES experiments.

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A•May 22, 2024•2 citations
In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the possibility of temporal nonlocality, mirroring the spatial nonlocality supposedly evidenced by the Bell correlations. In this context, Glick (2019) has argued that timelike entanglement and temporal nonlocality is demonstrated in delayed-choice entanglement swapping (DCES) experiments, like that of Ma et al. (2012), Megidish et al. (2013) and Hensen et al. (2015). I will argue that a careful analysis of these experiments shows that they in fact display nothing more than "ordinary" spacelike entanglement, and that any purported timelike entanglement is an artefact of selection bias. Regardless any other reason one may have for challenging the assumption of temporal locality, timelike entanglement as evidenced by these experiments is not among them. I conclude by discussing what lessons on the nature of entanglement might be drawn from an examination of DCES experiments.