The double-slit interference shows that the product of the wavelength and the distance from the slit plate to the projection screen is conserved in all inertial reference frames. This conservation ensures that the observed wavelength in any inertial reference frame is identical to the original wavelength in the rest frame of the light source. According to the Doppler effect, the observed frequency depends on the choice of inertial reference frame. With the same wavelength but different frequency, the speed of light is different in a different inertial reference frame.
The double-slit interference shows that the product of the wavelength and the distance from the slit plate to the projection screen is conserved in all inertial reference frames. This conservation ensures that the observed wavelength in any inertial reference frame is identical to the original wavelength in the rest frame of the light source. According to the Doppler effect, the observed frequency depends on the choice of inertial reference frame. With the same wavelength but different frequency, the speed of light is different in a different inertial reference frame.
The relativistic Doppler effect comes from the fact that observers in different inertial reference frames experience space and time differently, while the speed of light always remains the same. Consequently, a wave packet of light exhibits different frequencies, wavelengths, and amplitudes. In this paper, we present a local approach to the relativistic Doppler effect based on relativity, spatial and time translational symmetries, and energy conservation. Afterwards, we investigate the implications of the relativistic Doppler effect for the quantum state transformations of wave packets of light and show that a local photon is a local photon at the same point in the spacetime diagram in all inertial frames.
Abstract The constant speed of light is mutually exclusive with the Doppler effect. Dark matter provides enough gravity to destroy the solar system. According to the double slit test principle of light wave interference producing stripes, it is inevitable to deduce the following contrary conclusions which are mutually exclusive with this principle: (1) the farther the propagation distance is, the larger the cross section of light wave is, so the bigger the spot is. (2) Interference only occurs in the space between the double-slit device and the light target. The longer the optical path, the more times of interference and the brighter the pattern. (3) Along the propagation path of light, the stripes are constantly reshaped by interference, and the pattern of the test results should change with the distance between the double-slit device and the light target. (4) Because the principle of interference has strict requirements on frequency and phase, interference and dispersion should be initiated simultaneously. (5) The stripes are generated by the product of light wave interference, which is a spherical light wave spreading around the center of the interference point. It will trigger more interference in all directions, which makes the light wave form a value-added mode of exponential infinite iteration cycle. This would create a singularity similar to the Big Bang. (6) Because quanta are indivisible, the mechanism for generating dark stripes in the principle of interference is not sustainable interference but one-time annihilation. (7) The results of double slit, Michelson-Morley and refraction tests cannot be obtained by using other wave sources instead of light sources. (8) Let alone a photon passing through two slits at once, since the stripes are so much fainter than the source, it proves that unaimed light cannot pass through either slit. (9) The interference point is the intersection of the two light waves involved in the interference. It has a size of 0, and there is no space for anything to be generated. (10) Because the quantum is indivisible, the interference process must present a quantum state. Only when all conditions are met at the same time, the interference is suddenly triggered, which proves that the interference is impossible. (11) Polarization is a unique feature of light and cannot be absent in interference conditions. (12) Stripes are polarized and cannot be explained by the interference principle of light waves. (13) The phenomenon of "observation can tamper with results" is known through observation, which means that this phenomenon is tampered with by observation. (14) Similar to driving a car, light is refracted by turning the beam toward the side that slows down first. (15) The generation of a wavelet source at the point of contact is a general and fundamental law of waves, which is categorically rejected by light waves. (16) It is an objective astronomical phenomenon that binary star systems orbiting each other do not produce the Doppler effect. This phenomenon cannot prove that the speed of light is constant but can only be regarded as evidence that all celestial bodies cannot produce the Doppler effect; that is, redshift is a distortion of another astronomical phenomenon. The absorption spectrum of hydrogen is not radiation but a filtering feature, and it is impossible to produce the Doppler effect. The redshift cannot turn light into circular magnetic lines. Hubble's law without the Doppler effect has no basis. (17) The principle that allows light to travel properly through transparent objects is opposed to opaque ones. (18) A double-slit test with "lights that have collapsed into particles" could bring Schrodinger's cat back to life.
Abstract If light wave interference is the cause of the double-slit test fringe, several conclusions deduced from this principle, which are far from the objective facts, are as follows: (1) The farther the propagation distance is, the larger the light wave, and therefore the larger the spot. (2) Interference only occurs on the way from the double-slit device to the light target. The longer the optical path is, the more interference points make the pattern brighter. (3) The stripes along the way are continuously modified by interference, and the interference in the whole interval creates the stripes. The pattern of the stripes of the moving light target should change with the distance. (4) Because the principle is exactly the same, interference should be able to cause dispersion. (5) The products of light wave interference should be the new light waves that diffuse around the interference point as the center of the ball. They will not only trigger more interference but also make the increment mode of the light wave form an exponential infinite iterative cycle. This would create a singularity similar to the Big Bang. (6) Dark stripes are generated not by sustainable interference but by one-off annihilation. (7) If the light source is replaced by another wave source, the corresponding results cannot be obtained by double-slit, Michelson–Morley and refraction tests. (8) Let alone a photon passing through two slits at once, since the fringe is much fainter than the source, it proves that unaimed light cannot pass through either slit. (9) It is impossible to generate anything from the interference point of size 0. (10) It is a good method to verify the collapse principle and achievement by a double-slit test with light that has collapsed into particles. (11) The fundamental properties of quantum will challenge the principle of interference. (12) For the phenomenon of "observation can tamper with results", because this phenomenon is also known through observation, it means that it has been tampered with. (13) Only light has the characteristic of polarization, and the absence of this unique characteristic in the interference condition is a fatal flaw. (14) Similar to driving a car, light is refracted by turning the beam toward the side that slows down first. (15) The principles of geometric optics, represented by reflection and focus, are observed only by photons and not by light waves. The principle of generating a wavelet source at the point of contact is a general law that waves obey but not that light waves obey. (16) The wavelet source principle applies only to water waves but not to light waves. (17) Because the direction of vibration and propagation is orthogonal, the s-wave cannot produce the Doppler effect. It is an objective astronomical phenomenon that the double star system orbiting each other does not produce a Doppler effect. This phenomenon cannot be regarded as evidence that the speed of light is constant but only as evidence that all celestial bodies cannot produce the Doppler effect; that is, redshift is a distortion of another astronomical phenomenon. The absorption spectrum of hydrogen is not radiation, and the redshift data are disputed. The redshift cannot turn light into circular magnetic lines. Dark matter provides gravity that could destroy the solar system. Hubble's law without the Doppler effect has no basis. (18) The principle that allows light to travel properly through transparent objects is opposed to opaque ones.
Abstract Because the polarization (vibration) vector and the propagation vector are orthogonal, a light wave (s-wave) cannot produce a Doppler effect. The constant speed of light is mutually exclusive with the Doppler effect. The gravity provided by dark matter destroys the solar system. If light wave interference produces double-slit test stripes, it will inevitably result in the following anti-conventional conclusions, which are mutually incompatible with this principle: (1) The farther the propagation distance is, the larger the cross section of the light wave, and therefore the larger the spot. (2) Interference only occurs in the space between the double-slit device and the target. The longer the optical path is, the more interference should be generated to make the pattern brighter. (3) Along the whole interference interval, the stripes are constantly reshaped by interference, and their style should change with the distance of the target. (4) Because the principle of interference has strict requirements on frequency and phase, interference and dispersion should be initiated simultaneously. (5) Because interference generates stripes, the product of light wave interference should be a new light wave that spreads around the interference point as the center of the ball. This will trigger more interference in all directions, which makes the light wave form a value-added mode of exponential infinite iteration cycle. This would create a singularity similar to the Big Bang. (6) Dark stripes are generated not by sustainable interference but by one-off annihilation. (7) The results of double-slit, Michelson–Morley and refraction tests cannot be obtained by using other wave sources instead of light sources. (8) Let alone a photon passing through two slits at once, since the stripes are so much fainter than the source, it proves that unaimed light cannot pass through either slit. (9) It is impossible to generate anything from the interference point of size 0. Interference to generate stripes is impractical. (10) Quantum indivisibility is mutually exclusive with the principle of interference. (11) The polarization characteristic unique to light cannot be absent in interference conditions. (12) The stripes are polarized and do not conform to the interference principle of light waves. (13) The phenomenon of "observation can tamper with results" is known through observation, which means that this phenomenon is tampered with by observation. (14) Similar to driving a car, light is refracted by turning the beam toward the side that slows down first. (15) The generation of a wavelet source at the point of contact is a general and fundamental law of waves, which is categorically rejected by light waves. (16) It is an objective astronomical phenomenon that binary star systems orbiting each other do not produce the Doppler effect. This phenomenon cannot prove that the speed of light is constant but can only be regarded as evidence that all celestial bodies cannot produce the Doppler effect; that is, redshift is a distortion of another astronomical phenomenon. The absorption spectrum of hydrogen is not radiation but a filtering feature, and it is impossible to produce the Doppler effect. The redshift cannot turn light into circular magnetic lines. Hubble's law without the Doppler effect has no basis. (17) The principle that allows light to travel properly through transparent objects is opposed to opaque ones. (18) A double-slit test with "lights that have collapsed into particles" could bring Schrodinger's cat back to life.
Abstract Because the polarization (vibration) vector and the propagation vector are orthogonal, a light wave (s-wave) cannot produce a Doppler effect. The constant speed of light is mutually exclusive with the Doppler effect. The gravity provided by dark matter destroys the solar system. If light wave interference produces double-slit test stripes, it will inevitably result in the following anti-conventional conclusions, which are mutually incompatible with this principle: (1) The farther the propagation distance is, the larger the cross section of the light wave, and therefore the larger the spot. (2) Interference only occurs in the space between the double-slit device and the target. The longer the optical path is, the more interference should be generated to make the pattern brighter. (3) Along the whole interference interval, the stripes are constantly reshaped by interference, and their style should change with the distance of the target. (4) Because the principle of interference has strict requirements on frequency and phase, interference and dispersion should be initiated simultaneously. (5) Because interference generates stripes, the product of light wave interference should be a new light wave that spreads around the interference point as the center of the ball. This will trigger more interference in all directions, which makes the light wave form a value-added mode of exponential infinite iteration cycle. This would create a singularity similar to the Big Bang. (6) Dark stripes are generated not by sustainable interference but by one-off annihilation. (7) The results of double-slit, Michelson–Morley and refraction tests cannot be obtained by using other wave sources instead of light sources. (8) Let alone a photon passing through two slits at once, since the stripes are so much fainter than the source, it proves that unaimed light cannot pass through either slit. (9) It is impossible to generate anything from the interference point of size 0. Interference to generate stripes is impractical. (10) Quantum indivisibility is mutually exclusive with the principle of interference. (11) The polarization characteristic unique to light cannot be absent in interference conditions. (12) The stripes are polarized and do not conform to the interference principle of light waves. (13) The phenomenon of "observation can tamper with results" is known through observation, which means that this phenomenon is tampered with by observation. (14) Similar to driving a car, light is refracted by turning the beam toward the side that slows down first. (15) The generation of a wavelet source at the point of contact is a general and fundamental law of waves, which is categorically rejected by light waves. (16) It is an objective astronomical phenomenon that binary star systems orbiting each other do not produce the Doppler effect. This phenomenon cannot prove that the speed of light is constant but can only be regarded as evidence that all celestial bodies cannot produce the Doppler effect; that is, redshift is a distortion of another astronomical phenomenon. The absorption spectrum of hydrogen is not radiation but a filtering feature, and it is impossible to produce the Doppler effect. The redshift cannot turn light into circular magnetic lines. Hubble's law without the Doppler effect has no basis. (17) The principle that allows light to travel properly through transparent objects is opposed to opaque ones. (18) A double-slit test with "lights that have collapsed into particles" could bring Schrodinger's cat back to life.
Abstract The constant speed of light is mutually exclusive with the Doppler effect. The gravity provided by dark matter destroys the solar system. If light wave interference produces double-slit test stripes, it will inevitably result in the following anti-conventional conclusions, which are mutually incompatible with this principle: (1) The farther the propagation distance is, the larger the cross section of the light wave, and therefore the larger the spot. (2) Interference only occurs in the space between the double-slit device and the target. The longer the optical path is, the more interference should be generated to make the pattern brighter. (3) Along the whole interference interval, the stripes are constantly reshaped by interference, and their style should change with the distance of the target. (4) Because the principle of interference has strict requirements on frequency and phase, interference and dispersion should be initiated simultaneously. (5) Because interference generates stripes, the product of light wave interference should be a new light wave that spreads around the interference point as the center of the ball. This will trigger more interference in all directions, which makes the light wave form a value-added mode of exponential infinite iteration cycle. This would create a singularity similar to the Big Bang. (6) Dark stripes are generated not by sustainable interference but by one-off annihilation. (7) The results of double-slit, Michelson–Morley and refraction tests cannot be obtained by using other wave sources instead of light sources. (8) Let alone a photon passing through two slits at once, since the stripes are so much fainter than the source, it proves that unaimed light cannot pass through either slit. (9) It is impossible to generate anything from the interference point of size 0. Interference to generate stripes is impractical. (10) Quantum indivisibility is mutually exclusive with the principle of interference. (11) The polarization characteristic unique to light cannot be absent in interference conditions. (12) The stripes are polarized and do not conform to the interference principle of light waves. (13) The phenomenon of "observation can tamper with results" is known through observation, which means that this phenomenon is tampered with by observation. (14) Similar to driving a car, light is refracted by turning the beam toward the side that slows down first. (15) The generation of a wavelet source at the point of contact is a general and fundamental law of waves, which is categorically rejected by light waves. (16) It is an objective astronomical phenomenon that binary star systems orbiting each other do not produce the Doppler effect. This phenomenon cannot prove that the speed of light is constant but can only be regarded as evidence that all celestial bodies cannot produce the Doppler effect; that is, redshift is a distortion of another astronomical phenomenon. The absorption spectrum of hydrogen is not radiation but a filtering feature, and it is impossible to produce the Doppler effect. The redshift cannot turn light into circular magnetic lines. Hubble's law without the Doppler effect has no basis. (17) The principle that allows light to travel properly through transparent objects is opposed to opaque ones. (18) A double-slit test with "lights that have collapsed into particles" could bring Schrodinger's cat back to life.