Abstract. Most protocols for distributed, fault-tolerant computation, or multi-party computation (MPC), provide security guarantees in an all-or-nothing fashion: If the number of corrupted parties is below a certain threshold, these protocols provide all specified security guarantees. Beyond this threshold, they provide no security guarantees at all. Furthermore, most previous protocols achieve either information-theoretic (IT) security, in which case this threshold is low, or they achieve only computational security, in which case this threshold is high. In contrast, a hybrid-secure proto-col provides different security guarantees depending on the set of corrupted parties and the com-putational power of the adversary, without being aware of the actual adversarial setting. Thus, hybrid-secure MPC protocols allow for graceful degradation of security. We present a hybrid-secure MPC protocol that provides an optimal trade-off between IT robustness and computational privacy: For any robustness parameter ρ < n 2, we obtain one MPC protocol that is simultaneously IT secure with robustness for up to t ≤ ρ actively corrupted parties, IT secure with fairness (no robustness) for up to t < n 2, and computationally secure with agreement on abort
Abstract. Most protocols for distributed, fault-tolerant computation, or multi-party computation (MPC), provide security guarantees in an all-or-nothing fashion: If the number of corrupted parties is below a certain threshold, these protocols provide all specified security guarantees. Beyond this threshold, they provide no security guarantees at all. Furthermore, most previous protocols achieve either information-theoretic (IT) security, in which case this threshold is low, or they achieve only computational security, in which case this threshold is high. In contrast, a hybrid-secure proto-col provides different security guarantees depending on the set of corrupted parties and the com-putational power of the adversary, without being aware of the actual adversarial setting. Thus, hybrid-secure MPC protocols allow for graceful degradation of security. We present a hybrid-secure MPC protocol that provides an optimal trade-off between IT robustness and computational privacy: For any robustness parameter ρ < n 2, we obtain one MPC protocol that is simultaneously IT secure with robustness for up to t ≤ ρ actively corrupted parties, IT secure with fairness (no robustness) for up to t < n 2, and computationally secure with agreement on abort
Abstract. The goal of Multi-Party Computation (MPC) is to perform an arbitrary computation in a distributed, private, and fault-tolerant way. For this purpose, a fixed set of n parties runs a protocol that tolerates an adversary corrupting a subset of the participating parties, and still preserves certain security guarantees. Most MPC protocols provide security guarantees in an all-or-nothing fashion: Either the set of corrupted parties is tolerated and the protocol provides all specified security guarantees, or the set of corrupted parties is not tolerated and the protocol provides no security guarantees at all. Similarly, corruptions are in an all-or-nothing fashion: Either a party is fully honest, or it is fully corrupted. For example, an actively secure protocol is rendered completely insecure when just one party is corrupted additionally to what is tolerated, even if all corrupted parties are only passive. In this paper, we provide the first treatment of MPC with graceful degradation of both security and corruptions. First of all, our protocols provide graceful degradation of security, i.e., different security guarantees depending on the actual number of corrupted parties: the more corruptions, the weaker the security guarantee. We consider all security properties generally discussed in the literature (secrecy, correctness, robustness, fairness, and agreement on abort). Furthermore, the protocols provide
The goal of Multi-Party Computation (MPC) is to perform an arbitrary computation in a distributed, private, and fault-tolerant way. For this purpose, a fixed set of n parties runs a protocol that tolerates an adversary corrupting a subset of the participating parties, and still preserves certain security guarantees.
Most MPC protocols provide security guarantees in an all-or-nothing fashion. In this paper, we provide the first treatment of MPC with graceful degradation of both security and corruptions. First of all, our protocols provide graceful degradation of security, i.e., different security guarantees depending on the actual number of corrupted parties: the more corruptions, the weaker the security guarantee. We consider all security properties generally discussed in the literature (secrecy, correctness, robustness, fairness, and agreement on abort). Furthermore, the protocols provide graceful degradation with respect to the corruption type, by distinguishing fully honest parties, passively corrupted parties, and actively corrupted parties. Security can be maintained against more passive corruptions than is possible for active corruptions.
We focus on perfect security, and prove exact bounds for which MPC with graceful degradation of security and corruptions is possible for both threshold and general adversaries. Furthermore, we provide protocols that meet these bounds. This strictly generalizes known results on hybrid security and mixed adversaries.
Most proposed protocols for multi-party computation are designed to be secure either against information-theoretic or against computational adversaries.Each setting has its known advantages and disadvantages.In the computational setting we can achieve nonrobust MPC for up to t < n corrupted parties, but relying on unproven intractability assumptions.In the information-theoretic setting we do not have any unproven assumptions, but only t < n/2 corrupted parties can be tolerated.In [Cha89] Chaum sketches a hybrid protocol that brings together the best of both worlds: Information-theoretic security with abort (i.e.privacy and correctness, but no fairness or robustness) is achieved for t < n/2 corrupted parties.Beyond this threshold, for t < n corrupted parties, the protocol achieves computational security with abort.In this work, we first formalize the protocol idea described in [Cha89] and prove its security.In a second step, we extend the protocol to provide fairness and robustness.Whereas fairness comes "for free", robustness requires a trade-off similar to the one in [IKLP06].Then, we describe a construction for realizing the protocol in the universallycomposable setting as proposed in [Can01].For his protocol, Chaum assumed that a broadcast channel is given.In the last part of this work we discuss the implications of dropping this assumption, and obtain an interesting new result: It is possible to achieve the same bounds as in [Cha89], extended with fairness, without a broadcast channel.
Abstract. The goal of Multi-Party Computation (MPC) is to perform an arbitrary computation in a distributed, private, and fault-tolerant way. For this purpose, a fixed set of n parties runs a protocol that tolerates an adversary corrupting a subset of the parties, preserving certain security guarantees like correctness, secrecy, robustness, and fairness. Corruptions can be either passive or active: A passively corrupted party follows the protocol correctly, but the adversary learns the entire internal state of this party. An actively corrupted party is completely controlled by the adversary, and may deviate arbitrarily from the protocol. A mixed adversary may at the same time corrupt some parties actively and some additional parties passively. In this work, we consider the statistical setting with mixed adversaries and study the exact consequences of active and passive corruptions on secrecy, correctness, robustness, and fairness separately (i.e., hybrid security). Clearly, the number of passive corruptions affects the thresholds for secrecy, while the number of active corruptions affects all thresholds. It turns out that in the statistical setting, the number of passive corruptions in particular also affects the threshold for correctness, i.e., in all protocols there are (tolerated) adversaries for which a single additional passive corruption is sufficient to break correctness. This is in contrast to both the perfect and the computational setting, where such an influence cannot be observed. Apparently, this effect arises from the use of information-theoretic signatures, which are part of most (if not all) statistical protocols.
Securemulti-party computation(MPC) is a fundamental problem in secure distributed computing. An MPC protocol allows a set ofnmutually distrusting parties to carry out any joint computation of their private inputs, without disclosing any additional information about their inputs. MPC withinformation-theoreticsecurity (also calledunconditional security) provides the strongest security guarantees and remains secure even againstcomputationally unboundedadversaries.Perfectly-secureMPC protocols are a class of information-theoretically secure MPC protocols, which provide all the security guarantees in anerror-freefashion. The focus of this work is perfectly-secure MPC. Known protocols are designedassumingeither asynchronousorasynchronouscommunication network. It is well known that perfectly-securesynchronousMPC is possible as long as the adversary can corrupt anyts<n/3parties. On the other hand, perfectly-secureasynchronousMPC protocols can tolerate up tota<n/4corrupt parties. A natural question is does there exist asingleMPC protocol for the setting where the parties arenot awareof the exact network type and which can tolerate up tots<n/3corruptions in a synchronous network and up tota<n/4corruptions in anasynchronousnetwork. We design such abest-of-both-worldsperfectly-secure MPC protocol, provided3ts+ta<nholds. For designing our protocol, we design two important building blocks which are of independent interest. The first building block is a best-of-both-worldsByzantine agreement(BA) protocol toleratingt<n/3corruptions which remains securebothin a synchronous as well as asynchronous network. The second building block is a polynomial-based best-of-both-worldsverifiable secret-sharing(VSS) protocol, which can tolerate up totsandtacorruptions in asynchronousand in anasynchronousnetwork respectively.