Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

ALGUNAS APLICACIONES TECNOLÓGICAS DE LA FÍSICA CUÁNTICA

Yolanda Cadenas Gómez

Published Nov 1, 2012• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

This article has no greater claim to the expose some of the technological applications of contemporary physics, since our society revolves around them and, however, the greater part of the population, which makes up the society, ignores its origin and they even think that particle physics or quantum physics is something that only concerns a few theoretical and experimental physicist who has nothing to do with them. In a technological society such as ours not cannot ignore these applications as they have profoundly changed our way of life and interact with each other.

Related papers

Física cuántica y conciencia

Inmaculada Nogués

We increasingly know more about quantum physics, and of how modern physics can widen our understanding of daily life, of ourselves and our relationship with the world. Quantum physics opens up to us a new perspective on the link between matter and awareness, and of how its principies ( wave-particle duality, coherence, no locality, indetermination, etc.) permit us to understand many, until now unknown, mysteries; of how the duality of mind-body is the reflection of the dual ity wave-particle; of how the awareness of the observer modifies the result of the experiment; of how the coherence or not of the therapist influences the pacient; of the action of the mind at a distance; of the freewill, etc.

Natura Medicatrix: Revista médica para el estudio y difusión de las medicinas alternativas•Jan 1, 2001•0 citations

Diary of a Carefully Worded Paper: More Letters to Asher Peres

Christopher A. Fuchs

“Partners in crime again?” CAF to AP 29 September 1999 Introduction Irving John Good once titled a paper, “46,656 Varieties of Bayesians.” With little stretch of the imagination, one can believe that a similar paper on the interpretations of quantum mechanics exists somewhere out there too. And that may be true even though 46,656 is greater than the whole membership of the American Physical Society! It is no wonder that taking a stand on quantum foundations is treacherous business. Nevertheless, in the March 2000 issue of Physics Today , Asher Peres and I flouted the usual rewards of a calm life and did just that. Our article was titled, “Quantum Theory Needs No ‘Interpretation’.” This chapter is about the evolution of that article and a later “reply to critics.” When I was an undergraduate at the University of Texas, Bryce DeWitt made a great impression on me by saying something I have not forgotten: “We learn mathematics so that we don't have to think when we do physics.” My paper with Asher contained no mathematics. We had to think, and think very hard. The fruits of that labor, for my part, were in a greatly enhanced keenness for seeing through various foundational issues. How I wanted to share that newfound keenness with the reader! But it was difficult, if not impossible, to convey such an aspect of the paper-writing process in the very paper itself.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jan 6, 2011•0 citations

Un acercamiento al paradigma cuántico

John Fernando Zapata Mesa

En este breve escrito se hace algunos comentarios sobre la física cuántica con el objetivo de hacer un acercamiento al lector a este nuevo paradigma y de motivar una reflexión en esta línea.La física cuántica es la ciencia más desarrollada y mejor fundamentada hasta el momento junto con la teoría de la relatividad de Einstein. Toda la tecnología actual es una consecuencia directa de la física cuántica, es decir sin física cuántica no hubiese sido posible la construcción de un láser, computador (internet), celulares, microondas, transbordadores espaciales, etc. El impacto de la tecnología en el hombre moderno es abrumador, el acceso a la información, la creación de internet y las consecuencias sobre las estructuras políticas, educativas y económicas es impresionante.Entonces la importancia de la física cuántica está más que justificada, además la cosmología relativista, la teoría cuántica de campos, la astrofísica, las teorías del big bang sobre el origen del universo, agujeros negros, materia oscura, teoría de supercuerdas, supermembranas, la física nuclear, universos paralelos, la física atómica, etc se enmarcan dentro de la física moderna, que consta de la física cuántica y la teoría de la relatividad general.La física cuántica nos proporciona mucha tecnología pero este no es su único aspecto de gran relevancia, hay otro aspecto y muy importante, es la forma de pensar que introduce. El pensamiento cuántico introduce una forma de pensar radicalmente distinta a lo que antes el ser humano creía saber sobre la naturaleza del universo y de si mismo. Las ideas cuánticas son complejas precisamente por ese aspecto de tener que reestructurar la mente en todos sus esquemas conceptuales

Katharsis•Jun 20, 2009•0 citations

RECONOCIMIENTO A ALFRED U’REN POR SUS EXPLORACIONES EN LA ÓPTICA CUÁNTICA

Patricia López

LA TRANSMISION Y PROCESAMIENTO DE INFORMACION EFECTUADOS DE FORMA RADICALMENTE MAS EFICIENTE EN COMPARACION CON METODOS BASADOS EN LA FISICA CLASICA, CONSTITUYEN POSIBLES APLICACIONES PARA LA OPTICA CUANTICA. SE TRATA DE UN AREA DE LA FISICA QUE PODRIA REVOLUCIONAR LA COMPUTACION Y LA CRIPTOGRAFIA.

Gaceta UNAM (2010-2016)•Oct 21, 2013•0 citations

Modern Physics Applications

Bill Franklin

There is much in modern (20th century) physics that cannot be explained by classical physics, but also much that can. Even when classical physics is inadequate, the classical quantities of momentum and energy are still an essential part of our understanding.

•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations

The Pragmatism of Knowledge: Quantum Mechanics

Tyler M. Rooker

Quantum mechanics is certainly a strange place to start an investigation into the nature of the relationship between science and society. However, this article begins by integrating its history and proceeds through current conceptions of it by some physicists to examine quantum mechanics as an intersection of both science and knowledge. A famous thought experiment by Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen pointed to an area that few physicists still research–a paradigm gone awry. Yet the vast majority of physiciststoday do not agonize over this uncertainty. Physics today presses forward with indominable speed and precision. But by questioning a small sample of physicists doing physics about their practice, this study aims at an everyday physicist’s understanding of the matter; a paradox that lies between the results of experiment and their interpretation or place as knowledge in society. For Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen, the paradox was that we can only determine the spin of an entangled particle–it only becomes real–after measuring the spin of its partner particle. For a few contemporary physicists, the problem is how to understand the fact that a measured particle “teleports” its state instantaniously to another point in space. Practicing physicist resolve this, to put it simply, by just using it. Quantum mechanics, as with physics, is incredibly accurate–accepting it as truth yields results that physicists and society can use. By interrogating this process in its historicity and current formulation, this article sheds some light on the way physics works as knowledge. It provides a possibility for turning the scientific eye toward the very meaning of science.

Bulletin of Science Technology & Society•Apr 1, 2001•2 citations
This article has no greater claim to the expose some of the technological applications of contemporary physics, since our society revolves around them and, however, the greater part of the population, which makes up the society, ignores its origin and they even think that particle physics or quantum physics is something that only concerns a few theoretical and experimental physicist who has nothing to do with them. In a technological society such as ours not cannot ignore these applications as they have profoundly changed our way of life and interact with each other.
We increasingly know more about quantum physics, and of how modern physics can widen our understanding of daily life, of ourselves and our relationship with the world. Quantum physics opens up to us a new perspective on the link between matter and awareness, and of how its principies ( wave-particle duality, coherence, no locality, indetermination, etc.) permit us to understand many, until now unknown, mysteries; of how the duality of mind-body is the reflection of the dual ity wave-particle; of how the awareness of the observer modifies the result of the experiment; of how the coherence or not of the therapist influences the pacient; of the action of the mind at a distance; of the freewill, etc.
“Partners in crime again?” CAF to AP 29 September 1999 Introduction Irving John Good once titled a paper, “46,656 Varieties of Bayesians.” With little stretch of the imagination, one can believe that a similar paper on the interpretations of quantum mechanics exists somewhere out there too. And that may be true even though 46,656 is greater than the whole membership of the American Physical Society! It is no wonder that taking a stand on quantum foundations is treacherous business. Nevertheless, in the March 2000 issue of Physics Today , Asher Peres and I flouted the usual rewards of a calm life and did just that. Our article was titled, “Quantum Theory Needs No ‘Interpretation’.” This chapter is about the evolution of that article and a later “reply to critics.” When I was an undergraduate at the University of Texas, Bryce DeWitt made a great impression on me by saying something I have not forgotten: “We learn mathematics so that we don't have to think when we do physics.” My paper with Asher contained no mathematics. We had to think, and think very hard. The fruits of that labor, for my part, were in a greatly enhanced keenness for seeing through various foundational issues. How I wanted to share that newfound keenness with the reader! But it was difficult, if not impossible, to convey such an aspect of the paper-writing process in the very paper itself.
En este breve escrito se hace algunos comentarios sobre la física cuántica con el objetivo de hacer un acercamiento al lector a este nuevo paradigma y de motivar una reflexión en esta línea.La física cuántica es la ciencia más desarrollada y mejor fundamentada hasta el momento junto con la teoría de la relatividad de Einstein. Toda la tecnología actual es una consecuencia directa de la física cuántica, es decir sin física cuántica no hubiese sido posible la construcción de un láser, computador (internet), celulares, microondas, transbordadores espaciales, etc. El impacto de la tecnología en el hombre moderno es abrumador, el acceso a la información, la creación de internet y las consecuencias sobre las estructuras políticas, educativas y económicas es impresionante.Entonces la importancia de la física cuántica está más que justificada, además la cosmología relativista, la teoría cuántica de campos, la astrofísica, las teorías del big bang sobre el origen del universo, agujeros negros, materia oscura, teoría de supercuerdas, supermembranas, la física nuclear, universos paralelos, la física atómica, etc se enmarcan dentro de la física moderna, que consta de la física cuántica y la teoría de la relatividad general.La física cuántica nos proporciona mucha tecnología pero este no es su único aspecto de gran relevancia, hay otro aspecto y muy importante, es la forma de pensar que introduce. El pensamiento cuántico introduce una forma de pensar radicalmente distinta a lo que antes el ser humano creía saber sobre la naturaleza del universo y de si mismo. Las ideas cuánticas son complejas precisamente por ese aspecto de tener que reestructurar la mente en todos sus esquemas conceptuales
Quantum mechanics is certainly a strange place to start an investigation into the nature of the relationship between science and society. However, this article begins by integrating its history and proceeds through current conceptions of it by some physicists to examine quantum mechanics as an intersection of both science and knowledge. A famous thought experiment by Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen pointed to an area that few physicists still research–a paradigm gone awry. Yet the vast majority of physiciststoday do not agonize over this uncertainty. Physics today presses forward with indominable speed and precision. But by questioning a small sample of physicists doing physics about their practice, this study aims at an everyday physicist’s understanding of the matter; a paradox that lies between the results of experiment and their interpretation or place as knowledge in society. For Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen, the paradox was that we can only determine the spin of an entangled particle–it only becomes real–after measuring the spin of its partner particle. For a few contemporary physicists, the problem is how to understand the fact that a measured particle “teleports” its state instantaniously to another point in space. Practicing physicist resolve this, to put it simply, by just using it. Quantum mechanics, as with physics, is incredibly accurate–accepting it as truth yields results that physicists and society can use. By interrogating this process in its historicity and current formulation, this article sheds some light on the way physics works as knowledge. It provides a possibility for turning the scientific eye toward the very meaning of science.