Concepts and formalism from acoustics are often used to exemplify quantum mechanics. Conversely, quantum mechanics could be used to achieve a new perspective on acoustics, as shown by Gabor studies. Here, we focus in particular on the study of human voice, considered as a probe to investigate the world of sounds. We present a theoretical framework that is based on observables of vocal production, and on some measurement apparati that can be used both for analysis and synthesis. In analogy to the description of spin states of a particle, the quantum-mechanical formalism is used to describe the relations between the fundamental states associated with phonetic labels such as phonation, turbulence, and slow myoelastic vibrations. The intermingling of these states, and their temporal evolution, can still be interpreted in the Fourier/Gabor plane, and effective extractors can be implemented. This would constitute the basis for a Quantum Vocal Theory of sound, with implications in sound analysis and design.
Concepts and formalism from acoustics are often used to exemplify quantum mechanics. Conversely, quantum mechanics could be used to achieve a new perspective on acoustics, as shown by Gabor studies. Here, we focus in particular on the study of human voice, considered as a probe to investigate the world of sounds. We present a theoretical framework that is based on observables of vocal production, and on some measurement apparati that can be used both for analysis and synthesis. In analogy to the description of spin states of a particle, the quantum-mechanical formalism is used to describe the relations between the fundamental states associated with phonetic labels such as phonation, turbulence, and slow myoelastic vibrations. The intermingling of these states, and their temporal evolution, can still be interpreted in the Fourier/Gabor plane, and effective extractors can be implemented. This would constitute the basis for a Quantum Vocal Theory of sound, with implications in sound analysis and design.
Abstract Concepts and formalism from acoustics are often used to exemplify quantum mechanics. Conversely, quantum mechanics could be used to achieve a new perspective on acoustics, as shown by Gabor studies. Here, we focus in particular on the study of human voice, considered as a probe to investigate the world of sounds. We present a theoretical framework that is based on observables of vocal production, and on some measurement apparati that can be used both for analysis and synthesis. In analogy to the description of spin states of a particle, the quantum-mechanical formalism is used to describe the relations between the fundamental states associated with phonetic labels such as phonation, turbulence, and supraglottal myoelastic vibrations. The intermingling of these states, and their temporal evolution, can still be interpreted in the Fourier/Gabor plane, and effective extractors can be implemented. The bases for a quantum vocal theory of sound, with implications in sound analysis and design, are presented.
Quantum mechanics, a cornerstone of modern physics, elucidates the behavior of particles at the most fundamental level. This paper delves into the foundational aspects and diverse interpretations of quantum mechanics, shedding light on its enigmatic principles and implications. Beginning with a comprehensive overview of the mathematical framework underlying quantum mechanics, including wave functions, operators, and probabilistic interpretations, the study explores key foundational principles such as superposition, uncertainty, and entanglement. Moreover, it critically examines various interpretations of quantum mechanics, including the Copenhagen interpretation, many-worlds interpretation, and pilot-wave theory, elucidating their philosophical underpinnings and empirical consequences. Through a synthesis of theoretical analysis and empirical evidence, this paper navigates the intricate landscape of quantum mechanics, offering insights into its profound implications for our understanding of reality.
Abstract We present an educational approach aimed at introducing the fundamental concepts of quantum mechanics (QM). By exploiting the formal analogy between sound wave behavior in an acoustic pipe (a drinking straw) and the quantum infinite square potential well, we provide an intuitive framework that explains the origin of energy quantization in bound quantum systems (such as atoms), introduces the concept of wavefunction, and lays the groundwork for discussing the Heisenberg uncertainty relations. The proposed method enables low-cost experimental activities that actively involve students, facilitating a meaningful connection between theoretical principles and empirical observations. Moreover, it encourages critical reflection on the Copenhagen interpretation of the wavefunction, promoting a deeper conceptual understanding.
Recently, there has been considerable interest in "sonifying" scientific data; however, sonifying quantum processes using the newest quantum technologies, including Noise Intermediate Scale Quantum devices and quantum random number generators, is still an emerging area of research.Music technologists and composers employ the growing accessibility to diverse data from quantum mechanics as musical tools in the hope of generating new sound expressions. How different is the quantum world from the classical one, and is it possible to express the quantum world using sounds? Quantum phenomena are very different from those that we experience in our everyday lives. Thus, it is challenging to understand them intuitively. In this paper, we propose sonification as a method toward an intuitive understanding of various quantum mechanical phenomena, from Rabi oscillations and resonance fluorescence of a single atom through the generation of Schrodinger cat states in strong laser field physics to insulator-superfluid transition in quantum many-body systems. This paper illustrates various methods we experimented with in sonification and score representations of quantum data depending on the source data and performance settings.
This paper examines the structural discrepancy between the mathematical formulations of physics—particularly those of quantum mechanics—and the conditions under which human beings recognize existence and establish observation. The fundamental equations of quantum mechanics do not require sensory distinctions such as whether a particle is “moving” or “at rest”; the same formalism allows both dynamic and static states. In contrast, human perceptual structures presuppose continuous change or motion for the recognition of existence and the establishment of observation. A completely unchanging entity does not readily emerge within the sensory world. Focusing on this discrepancy, this paper argues that mathematical equations describe the consistency of states rather than the conditions of existential recognition or generative processes. Furthermore, concepts such as “will” and “choice” do not belong to the third-person domain described by mathematical formalism, but instead function as first-person preconditions. Accordingly, this paper does not claim that there exist phenomena that cannot be expressed mathematically; rather, it clarifies that there are layers of reality that mathematics does not, by design, attempt to describe. This distinction does not indicate a limitation of mathematics, but instead reveals a layered structure of world-description, offering a new perspective for connecting physics, cognitive science, and philosophy.
Quantum mechanics is arguably one of the most successful scientific theories ever and its applications to chemistry, optics, and information theory are innumerable. This book provides the reader with a rigorous treatment of the main mathematical tools from harmonic analysis which play an essential role in the modern formulation of quantum mechanics. This allows us at the same time to suggest some new ideas and methods, with a special focus on topics such as the Wigner phase space formalism and its applications to the theory of the density operator and its entanglement properties. This book can be used with profit by advanced undergraduate students in mathematics and physics, as well as by confirmed researchers.