Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Detection of Phase Transitions in Quantum Spin Chains via Unsupervised Machine Learning

Yutaka Akagi, Nobuyuki Yoshioka, Hosho Katsura

Published Mar 5, 2019• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Unsupervised machine learning of topological phase transitions

Joaquin F. Rodriguez-Nieva, Mathias S. Scheurer

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 4, 2020•0 citations

Construction of phase diagrams of spin models using unsupervised machine learning

Elguja Archemashvili

•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

Unsupervised machine learning of phase transition in percolation

Wei Yu, Pin Lyu

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Aug 14, 2020•17 citations

Interpretable Machine Learning Study of Many-Body Localization Transition in Disordered Quantum Spin Chains

Wei Zhang, Lei Wang, Ziqiang Wang

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 5, 2019•0 citations

Detecting Quantum and Classical Phase Transitions via Unsupervised Machine Learning of the Fisher Information Metric

Victor Kasatkin, Evgeny Mozgunov, Nic Ezzell +1 more

The detection of quantum and classical phase transitions in the absence of an order parameter is possible using the Fisher information metric (FIM), also known as fidelity susceptibility. Here, we propose and investigate an unsupervised machine learning (ML) task: estimating the FIM given limited samples from a multivariate probability distribution of measurements made throughout the phase diagram. We utilize an unsupervised ML method called ClassiFIM (developed in a companion paper) to solve this task and demonstrate its empirical effectiveness in detecting both quantum and classical phase transitions using a variety of spin and fermionic models, for which we generate several publicly available datasets with accompanying ground-truth FIM. We find that ClassiFIM reliably detects both topological (e.g., XXZ chain) and dynamical (e.g., metal-insulator transition in Hubbard model) quantum phase transitions. We perform a detailed quantitative comparison with prior unsupervised ML methods for detecting quantum phase transitions. We demonstrate that ClassiFIM is competitive with these prior methods in terms of appropriate accuracy metrics while requiring significantly less resource-intensive training data compared to the original formulation of the prior methods. In particular, ClassiFIM only requires classical (single-basis) measurements. As part of our methodology development, we prove several theorems connecting the classical and quantum fidelity susceptibilities through equalities or bounds. We also significantly expand the existence conditions of the fidelity susceptibility, e.g., by relaxing standard differentiability conditions. These results may be of independent interest to the mathematical physics community.

arXiv:2408.03418•Aug 6, 2024•1 citation

Detecting Quantum Phase Transitions in Spin Chains

Yanchao Li, Wing Chi Yu, Hai‐Qing Lin

Quantum science and technology•Jan 1, 2022•1 citation
The detection of quantum and classical phase transitions in the absence of an order parameter is possible using the Fisher information metric (FIM), also known as fidelity susceptibility. Here, we propose and investigate an unsupervised machine learning (ML) task: estimating the FIM given limited samples from a multivariate probability distribution of measurements made throughout the phase diagram. We utilize an unsupervised ML method called ClassiFIM (developed in a companion paper) to solve this task and demonstrate its empirical effectiveness in detecting both quantum and classical phase transitions using a variety of spin and fermionic models, for which we generate several publicly available datasets with accompanying ground-truth FIM. We find that ClassiFIM reliably detects both topological (e.g., XXZ chain) and dynamical (e.g., metal-insulator transition in Hubbard model) quantum phase transitions. We perform a detailed quantitative comparison with prior unsupervised ML methods for detecting quantum phase transitions. We demonstrate that ClassiFIM is competitive with these prior methods in terms of appropriate accuracy metrics while requiring significantly less resource-intensive training data compared to the original formulation of the prior methods. In particular, ClassiFIM only requires classical (single-basis) measurements. As part of our methodology development, we prove several theorems connecting the classical and quantum fidelity susceptibilities through equalities or bounds. We also significantly expand the existence conditions of the fidelity susceptibility, e.g., by relaxing standard differentiability conditions. These results may be of independent interest to the mathematical physics community.