Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Quantum Circuit Compilation to NISQ processors

Eleanor Gilbert Rieffel, Davide Venturelli

Published Mar 5, 2019• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

On the Influence of Initial Qubit Placement During NISQ Circuit Compilation

Alexandru Paler

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2019•42 citations

Quantum compiling with reinforcement learning on a superconducting processor

Ziting Wang, Qiuhao Chen, Yuxuan Du +15 more

Abstract Effectively implementing quantum algorithms on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) processors is a central task in modern quantum technology. NISQ processors feature tens to a few hundreds of noisy qubits with limited coherence times and gate operations with errors, so NISQ algorithms naturally require employing circuits of short lengths via quantum compilation. Here, we evaluate a reinforcement learning (RL)-based quantum compiler on a superconducting processor. Our experiments reveal that for two-qubit circuits, the RL-based compiler surpasses conventional methods, demonstrating its ability to discover hardware-amenable circuits with near-optimal lengths. However, for three-qubit circuits, the RL-based compiler does not achieve unity theoretical fidelity. To address this limitation, we integrate a variational strategy with the RL-based compiler, highlighting their complementary strengths. Systematic experiments show that this variational RL-based compiler consistently identifies near-optimal circuits, even under stringent hardware constraints, outperforming conventional techniques. Furthermore, we analyze the impact of decoherence and gate errors, providing critical insights into the practical performance of RL-based compilers on quantum hardware. These findings exemplify the codesign of the software with hardware for efficient quantum compilation, offering valuable insights for the advancement of RL-based compilers.

arXiv:2406.12195•Machine Learning Science and Technology•Jun 26, 2026•3 citations

Mapping of quantum circuits onto NISQ superconducting processors

Lingling Lao, Daniel Manzano, Hans van Someren +2 more

•Aug 12, 2019•18 citations

Benchmarking NISQ-era quantum processors

Jay Gambetta

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 8, 2019•1 citation

On the Use of Calibration Data in Error-Aware Compilation Techniques for NISQ Devices

Handy Kurniawan, Laura Rodríguez-Soriano, Daniele Cuomo +2 more

Reliably executing quantum algorithms on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices is challenging, as they are severely constrained and prone to errors. Efficient quantum circuit compilation techniques are therefore crucial for overcoming their limitations and dealing with their high error rates. These techniques consider the quantum hardware restrictions, such as the limited qubit connectivity, and perform some transformations to the original circuit that can be executed on a given quantum processor. Certain compilation methods use error information based on calibration data to further improve the success probability or the fidelity of the circuit to be run. However, it is uncertain to what extent incorporating calibration information in the compilation process can enhance the circuit performance. For instance, considering the most recent error data provided by vendors after calibrating the processor might not be functional enough as quantum systems are subject to drift, making the latest calibration data obsolete within minutes. In this paper, we explore how different usage of calibration data impacts the circuit fidelity, by using several compilation techniques and quantum processors (IBM Perth and Brisbane). To this aim, we implemented a framework that incorporates some of the state-of-the-art noise-aware and non-noise-aware compilation techniques and allows the user to perform fair comparisons under similar processor conditions. Our experiments yield valuable insights into the effects of noise-aware methodologies and the employment of calibration data. The main finding is that pre-processing historical calibration data can improve fidelity when real-time calibration data is not available due to factors such as cloud service latency and waiting queues between compilation and execution on the quantum backend.

arXiv:2407.21462•IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE)•Sep 15, 2024•11 citations

Automated Reasoning in Quantum Circuit Compilation

Dimitrios Thanos, Alejandro Villoria, Sebastiaan Brand +4 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Oct 12, 2024•4 citations
Abstract Effectively implementing quantum algorithms on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) processors is a central task in modern quantum technology. NISQ processors feature tens to a few hundreds of noisy qubits with limited coherence times and gate operations with errors, so NISQ algorithms naturally require employing circuits of short lengths via quantum compilation. Here, we evaluate a reinforcement learning (RL)-based quantum compiler on a superconducting processor. Our experiments reveal that for two-qubit circuits, the RL-based compiler surpasses conventional methods, demonstrating its ability to discover hardware-amenable circuits with near-optimal lengths. However, for three-qubit circuits, the RL-based compiler does not achieve unity theoretical fidelity. To address this limitation, we integrate a variational strategy with the RL-based compiler, highlighting their complementary strengths. Systematic experiments show that this variational RL-based compiler consistently identifies near-optimal circuits, even under stringent hardware constraints, outperforming conventional techniques. Furthermore, we analyze the impact of decoherence and gate errors, providing critical insights into the practical performance of RL-based compilers on quantum hardware. These findings exemplify the codesign of the software with hardware for efficient quantum compilation, offering valuable insights for the advancement of RL-based compilers.
Reliably executing quantum algorithms on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices is challenging, as they are severely constrained and prone to errors. Efficient quantum circuit compilation techniques are therefore crucial for overcoming their limitations and dealing with their high error rates. These techniques consider the quantum hardware restrictions, such as the limited qubit connectivity, and perform some transformations to the original circuit that can be executed on a given quantum processor. Certain compilation methods use error information based on calibration data to further improve the success probability or the fidelity of the circuit to be run. However, it is uncertain to what extent incorporating calibration information in the compilation process can enhance the circuit performance. For instance, considering the most recent error data provided by vendors after calibrating the processor might not be functional enough as quantum systems are subject to drift, making the latest calibration data obsolete within minutes. In this paper, we explore how different usage of calibration data impacts the circuit fidelity, by using several compilation techniques and quantum processors (IBM Perth and Brisbane). To this aim, we implemented a framework that incorporates some of the state-of-the-art noise-aware and non-noise-aware compilation techniques and allows the user to perform fair comparisons under similar processor conditions. Our experiments yield valuable insights into the effects of noise-aware methodologies and the employment of calibration data. The main finding is that pre-processing historical calibration data can improve fidelity when real-time calibration data is not available due to factors such as cloud service latency and waiting queues between compilation and execution on the quantum backend.