Having just described electromagnetic radiation as a wave, it may seem a bit peculiar to embark on a particle description of that radiation. Perhaps it will help to recall from Chapter 2 that our perception of something depends in part on the means we use to perceive it and that we used a specific experiment (interference) to define the wave property. There is no reason to believe that one human-invented experiment is the only one that can be used to describe electromagnetic radiation. In fact, the Einstein photoelectric effect, described next, is consistent with light being a particle.
Having just described electromagnetic radiation as a wave, it may seem a bit peculiar to embark on a particle description of that radiation. Perhaps it will help to recall from Chapter 2 that our perception of something depends in part on the means we use to perceive it and that we used a specific experiment (interference) to define the wave property. There is no reason to believe that one human-invented experiment is the only one that can be used to describe electromagnetic radiation. In fact, the Einstein photoelectric effect, described next, is consistent with light being a particle.
It has already been noted (section 2.8) that high frequency electromagnetic radiation can exhibit particle-like behaviour. For example, in the sensitive type of detector known as a photomultiplier tube (described in Wehr and Richards, Physics of the Atom , 2nd edn, Addison-Wesley, section 10.5), a beam of low-intensity X-rays is detected as a sequence of isolated sharp pulses, such as would be produced by a stream of particles arriving at the detector. As was pointed out, it is not surprising that it is usually high-frequency radiation which travels in particle form; as shown in figure 2.39, a wave group of high-frequency radiation can be compressed into a very short time span. However, when we speak of a particle, we mean something more than an entity which arrives in a short time span. A particle has a definite size, or more exactly it has a well-defined energy and momentum. It was discovered around about 1900 that the same is true of an X-ray wave packet: all packets of a given frequency radiation carry the same energy and momentum. This revolutionary discovery means that we must treat the wave packets as particles on exactly the same footing as more familiar particles such as electrons. The electromagnetic particle is called a photon . There is a wealth of experimental evidence which may be used to define the properties of a photon. We shall be highly selective, however, and simply present two particularly clear-cut experiments, the photoelectric effect and Compton scattering, which enable one to define the energy and momentum of the photon in terms of the frequency and wave number of the corresponding wave. These experiments will be described in detail in section 4.1.
How can we construct a picture of the photon from the wealth of observation material available to us? The photon appears to have a split personality: it is neither a wave nor a particle but something else which, depending on the experimental situation, exhibits a wave- or a particle-like behavior. In other words, in the photon (as in material particles such as the electron) the particle–wave dualism becomes manifest. Whereas classically the wave and the particle pictures are separate, quantum mechanics accomplishes a formal synthesis through a unified mathematical treatment. Let us look first at the wave aspect familiar from classical electrodynamics, which seems to be the most natural description. It makes all the different interference phenomena understandable, such as the “interference of the photon with itself” on the one hand and the appearance of spatial and temporal intensity correlations in a thermal radiation field on the other (which are obviously brought about by superposition of elementary waves emitted independently from different atoms). It might come as a surprise (at least for those having quantum mechanical preconceptions) that the classical theory is valid down to arbitrarily small intensities: the visibility of the interference pattern does not deteriorate even for very small intensities – the zero point fluctuations of the electromagnetic field advocated by quantum mechanics do not have a disturbing effect – and is valid not only for conventional interference experiments but also for interference between independently generated light beams (in the form of laser light).
Light has long been perceived as a wave, or more specifically as an EM wave, and this is valid with respect to everyday observations. However, experiments involving light have produced surprising results that fall outside the realm of the wave nature of light. These experiments for the first time necessitated that light not be perceived as a wave but more like a particle. Some of these observations include photoelectric, Compton, and two-photon effects. In these experiments, light behaves more as an object filling a space just like a particle rather than a continuous entity like a wave. This is surprising given what we have learned in classical optics. In this chapter, we intend to analyze and understand the particle nature of light and its consequences.
The fundamental fact for quantum physics which has emerged from experimental investigations in the field is a double duality of wave and particle concepts. The wave theory of light, firmly grounded by the wave explanations of interference and diffraction and by Maxwell’s electromagnetic theory of light waves, is now recognized as giving but one aspect of the nature of radiation. The corpusclar aspect of radiation is revealed in the photoelectric effect and in the Compton effect. In these effects Planck’s constant appears as a universal constant which connects the wave and particle modes of description of the same radiation.
Light occupies a special position in our attempts to understand nature both classically and quantum mechanically. We recall that Newton, who made so many fundamental contributions to optics, championed a particle description of light and was not favorably disposed to the wave picture of light. However, the beautiful unification of electricity and magnetism achieved by Maxwell clearly showed that light was properly understood as the wave-like undulations of electric and magnetic fields propagating through space. The central role of light in marking the frontiers of physics continues on into the twentieth century with the ultraviolet catastrophe associated with black-body radiation on the one hand and the photoelectric effect on the other. Indeed, it was here that the era of quantum mechanics was initiated with Planck's introduction of the quantum of action that was necessary to explain the black-body radiation spectrum. The extension of these ideas led Einstein to explain the photoelectric effect, and to introduce the photon concept. It was, however, left to Dirac to combine the wave-and particlelike aspects of light so that the radiation field is capable of explaining all interference phenomena and yet shows the excitation of a specific atom located along a wave front absorbing one photon of energy. In this chapter, following Dirac, we associate each mode of the radiation field with a quantized simple harmonic oscillator, this is the essence of the quantum theory of radiation.
Neither particle nor wave The information about the particle behaviour and the wave behaviour of light, presented in the preceding chapter, forms an extremely peculiar combination when taken together. And yet both are true: the experiments have been done as described, with the outcome as stated. There are experiments that tell us clearly that light consists of waves; there are others that tell us, equally clearly, that light consists of particles. Somehow we must find a description of light that incorporates both kinds of behaviour. This is a formidable undertaking, but there is one cheerful fact: in absolutely none of the experiments that have ever been done did the particle and the wave behaviours occur simultaneously . Because this is a fact that covers the entire history of physics, we feel justified in assuming that this is a general feature of Nature, and that there cannot ever be an experiment in which the wave and particle behaviours both occur at the same time. This is a generalization, for we can never expect to do all possible experiments. This generalizing hypothesis was first announced by Bohr, who had the wonderful combination of daring and insight to postulate that the observation of certain quantities excludes the simultaneous observation of certain others.