Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Limitations on the use of the Heisenberg picture

J. D. Franson, R. A. Brewster

Published Nov 15, 2018• 1 citation
OpenAlex

Abstract

The Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures are equivalent formulations of quantum mechanics in the sense that they give the same expectation value for any operator. We consider a sequence of two or more unitary transformations and show that the Heisenberg operator produced after the first transformation cannot be viewed as the input to the second transformation. The experimental consequences of this are illustrated by several examples in quantum optics.

Related papers

The Heisenberg picture

Dževad Belkić

In this chapter, the authors describe the Heisenberg picture of quantum mechanics by formally accomplishing a time-dependent transformation of state vectors and operators of the Schrodinger picture. Any new picture of quantum mechanics will be acceptable, if the Schrodinger state vectors and operators are subjected to a transformation, which does not alter: the spectrum of the eigenvalues of the operators and the scalar product of an arbitrary state vector with the eigenstate vectors. These two conditions are easily fulfilled by means of the unitary transformations. The authors show that a unitary operator represents an isomorph mapping of a certain unitary vector space onto itself. Since the physical quantities measured in the experiment are, in fact, a measure of the scalar product, as implied by the definition of the probability W through the scalar product in, it is clear that the predictions based upon the new, Heisenberg picture must be identical to those obtained in the Schrodinger picture.

CRC Press eBooks•Jan 15, 2020•0 citations

Unitary equivalence of Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures survives in nonlinear quantum mechanics

Lajos Diósi

The equivalence of Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures is often thought to break down in nonlinear quantum mechanics due to the absence of a state-independent unitary propagator. We show that for Hamiltonians depending on the state through instantaneous expectation values, the equivalence is preserved. While the unitary intertwiner becomes initial-state dependent, it remains well-defined and ensures identical physical predictions in both pictures. We illustrate this with the analytically solvable examples of a nonlinear spin precession and a mean-field harmonic force, as well as in local field theory with mean-field coupling.

quant-pharXiv:2609.07391•Sep 8, 2026•0 citations

Alternative Formulations

Bernard d’Espagnat

The description of the time evolution of systems is technically known as the "Schrodinger picture." An important alternative description is the "Heisenberg picture," which indeed was the one Heisenberg used when he first formulated quantum mechanics. The Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures represent two different but equivalent sets of rules. In other words, when applied to a given physical situation they lead to the same observable predictions. In some respects, the Heisenberg picture presents definite technical advantages. It is particularly convenient, for instance, in quantum field theory. The chapter discusses work consistently with the equivalent Schrodinger set of rules. For this reason, it describes briefly the Heisenberg formulation. The chapter shows that the expressions used in the Schrodinger picture can be carried over to the Heisenberg picture. It implies, however, that the kets associated with the possible values that can be found upon measurement of an observable are themselves time-dependent kets.

CRC Press eBooks•Mar 5, 2018•0 citations

Quantum Dynamics and Pictures

Z. Ficek

This chapter demonstrates how one can find the time evolution of the operators from the knowledge of the time evolution of the state vector, and vice versa. It introduces a unitary operator and discusses the concept of a unitary transformation to show how one could transfer the time dependence from the state vectors to the operators. The possibility that either the state vectors or the operators can depend explicitly on time will lead to introduce the Schrodinger, Heisenberg, and interaction pictures. The chapter discusses the fundamental differences between these pictures. It also discusses the Ehrenfest theorem, which shows under which conditions quantum mechanics predicts the same results for measured physical quantities as classical physics. It illustrates unitary transformations of an arbitrary operator Â(t) which can depend explicitly on time. Quantum mechanics produces the same result as classical mechanics for a system in which particles are represented by well-localized wave functions.

•Mar 3, 2017•0 citations

Complements

Bernard d’Espagnat

This chapter briefly explains the two elementary points concerning quantum mechanics: the mean value rule and the Heisenberg picture. The Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures are two different but equivalent sets of rules. In other words, when applied to a given physical situation they lead to the same observable predictions. In some respects the Heisenberg picture has definite technical advantages. It is particularly convenient, for instance, in quantum field theory. For describing pure cases the use of wave functions in place of kets is sometimes convenient. The mean value of an observable A and the probability that a measurement of A yields eigenvalue a k can be expressed by means of wave functions. The state vector of a system that does not undergo a measurement does not change with time, obviously this state vector is suddenly modified—also in the Heisenberg picture—when a measurement takes place.

CRC Press eBooks•May 4, 2018•0 citations

On the (Non)Equivalence of the Schrödinger and Heisenberg Pictures of Quantum Mechanics

Maurice A. de Gosson

The aim of this short Note is to show that the Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures of quantum mechanics are not equivalent unless one uses a quantization rule clearly stated by Born and Jordan in their famous 1925 paper. This rule is sufficient and necessary to ensure energy conservation in Heisenberg's matrix mechanics. It follows, in particular, that Schrödinger and Heisenberg mechanics are not equivalent if one quantizes observables using the Weyl prescription.

arXiv:1404.6775•Apr 27, 2014•0 citations
The Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures are equivalent formulations of quantum mechanics in the sense that they give the same expectation value for any operator. We consider a sequence of two or more unitary transformations and show that the Heisenberg operator produced after the first transformation cannot be viewed as the input to the second transformation. The experimental consequences of this are illustrated by several examples in quantum optics.
In this chapter, the authors describe the Heisenberg picture of quantum mechanics by formally accomplishing a time-dependent transformation of state vectors and operators of the Schrodinger picture. Any new picture of quantum mechanics will be acceptable, if the Schrodinger state vectors and operators are subjected to a transformation, which does not alter: the spectrum of the eigenvalues of the operators and the scalar product of an arbitrary state vector with the eigenstate vectors. These two conditions are easily fulfilled by means of the unitary transformations. The authors show that a unitary operator represents an isomorph mapping of a certain unitary vector space onto itself. Since the physical quantities measured in the experiment are, in fact, a measure of the scalar product, as implied by the definition of the probability W through the scalar product in, it is clear that the predictions based upon the new, Heisenberg picture must be identical to those obtained in the Schrodinger picture.
The equivalence of Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures is often thought to break down in nonlinear quantum mechanics due to the absence of a state-independent unitary propagator. We show that for Hamiltonians depending on the state through instantaneous expectation values, the equivalence is preserved. While the unitary intertwiner becomes initial-state dependent, it remains well-defined and ensures identical physical predictions in both pictures. We illustrate this with the analytically solvable examples of a nonlinear spin precession and a mean-field harmonic force, as well as in local field theory with mean-field coupling.
The description of the time evolution of systems is technically known as the "Schrodinger picture." An important alternative description is the "Heisenberg picture," which indeed was the one Heisenberg used when he first formulated quantum mechanics. The Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures represent two different but equivalent sets of rules. In other words, when applied to a given physical situation they lead to the same observable predictions. In some respects, the Heisenberg picture presents definite technical advantages. It is particularly convenient, for instance, in quantum field theory. The chapter discusses work consistently with the equivalent Schrodinger set of rules. For this reason, it describes briefly the Heisenberg formulation. The chapter shows that the expressions used in the Schrodinger picture can be carried over to the Heisenberg picture. It implies, however, that the kets associated with the possible values that can be found upon measurement of an observable are themselves time-dependent kets.
This chapter demonstrates how one can find the time evolution of the operators from the knowledge of the time evolution of the state vector, and vice versa. It introduces a unitary operator and discusses the concept of a unitary transformation to show how one could transfer the time dependence from the state vectors to the operators. The possibility that either the state vectors or the operators can depend explicitly on time will lead to introduce the Schrodinger, Heisenberg, and interaction pictures. The chapter discusses the fundamental differences between these pictures. It also discusses the Ehrenfest theorem, which shows under which conditions quantum mechanics predicts the same results for measured physical quantities as classical physics. It illustrates unitary transformations of an arbitrary operator Â(t) which can depend explicitly on time. Quantum mechanics produces the same result as classical mechanics for a system in which particles are represented by well-localized wave functions.
This chapter briefly explains the two elementary points concerning quantum mechanics: the mean value rule and the Heisenberg picture. The Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures are two different but equivalent sets of rules. In other words, when applied to a given physical situation they lead to the same observable predictions. In some respects the Heisenberg picture has definite technical advantages. It is particularly convenient, for instance, in quantum field theory. For describing pure cases the use of wave functions in place of kets is sometimes convenient. The mean value of an observable A and the probability that a measurement of A yields eigenvalue a k can be expressed by means of wave functions. The state vector of a system that does not undergo a measurement does not change with time, obviously this state vector is suddenly modified—also in the Heisenberg picture—when a measurement takes place.