Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

CRC Press eBooks

The Heisenberg picture

Dževad Belkić

Published Jan 15, 2020• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors describe the Heisenberg picture of quantum mechanics by formally accomplishing a time-dependent transformation of state vectors and operators of the Schrodinger picture. Any new picture of quantum mechanics will be acceptable, if the Schrodinger state vectors and operators are subjected to a transformation, which does not alter: the spectrum of the eigenvalues of the operators and the scalar product of an arbitrary state vector with the eigenstate vectors. These two conditions are easily fulfilled by means of the unitary transformations. The authors show that a unitary operator represents an isomorph mapping of a certain unitary vector space onto itself. Since the physical quantities measured in the experiment are, in fact, a measure of the scalar product, as implied by the definition of the probability W through the scalar product in, it is clear that the predictions based upon the new, Heisenberg picture must be identical to those obtained in the Schrodinger picture.

DOI
10.1201/9780429146497-8

Related papers

Quantum Dynamics and Pictures

Z. Ficek

This chapter demonstrates how one can find the time evolution of the operators from the knowledge of the time evolution of the state vector, and vice versa. It introduces a unitary operator and discusses the concept of a unitary transformation to show how one could transfer the time dependence from the state vectors to the operators. The possibility that either the state vectors or the operators can depend explicitly on time will lead to introduce the Schrodinger, Heisenberg, and interaction pictures. The chapter discusses the fundamental differences between these pictures. It also discusses the Ehrenfest theorem, which shows under which conditions quantum mechanics predicts the same results for measured physical quantities as classical physics. It illustrates unitary transformations of an arbitrary operator Â(t) which can depend explicitly on time. Quantum mechanics produces the same result as classical mechanics for a system in which particles are represented by well-localized wave functions.

•Mar 3, 2017•0 citations

Complements

Bernard d’Espagnat

This chapter briefly explains the two elementary points concerning quantum mechanics: the mean value rule and the Heisenberg picture. The Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures are two different but equivalent sets of rules. In other words, when applied to a given physical situation they lead to the same observable predictions. In some respects the Heisenberg picture has definite technical advantages. It is particularly convenient, for instance, in quantum field theory. For describing pure cases the use of wave functions in place of kets is sometimes convenient. The mean value of an observable A and the probability that a measurement of A yields eigenvalue a k can be expressed by means of wave functions. The state vector of a system that does not undergo a measurement does not change with time, obviously this state vector is suddenly modified—also in the Heisenberg picture—when a measurement takes place.

CRC Press eBooks•May 4, 2018•0 citations

Alternative Formulations

Bernard d’Espagnat

The description of the time evolution of systems is technically known as the "Schrodinger picture." An important alternative description is the "Heisenberg picture," which indeed was the one Heisenberg used when he first formulated quantum mechanics. The Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures represent two different but equivalent sets of rules. In other words, when applied to a given physical situation they lead to the same observable predictions. In some respects, the Heisenberg picture presents definite technical advantages. It is particularly convenient, for instance, in quantum field theory. The chapter discusses work consistently with the equivalent Schrodinger set of rules. For this reason, it describes briefly the Heisenberg formulation. The chapter shows that the expressions used in the Schrodinger picture can be carried over to the Heisenberg picture. It implies, however, that the kets associated with the possible values that can be found upon measurement of an observable are themselves time-dependent kets.

CRC Press eBooks•Mar 5, 2018•0 citations

Equation of Motion

Ahmad Amer

This chapter explores the Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures in quantum mechanics, emphasizing their mathematical equivalence and physical consistency. The two formulations are shown to be connected by a unitary transformation. The Heisenberg equation of motion is derived, and the time evolution of operators—particularly those not explicitly dependent on time—is expressed in terms of their initial values. It is demonstrated that scalar products, expectation values, matrix elements, and commutation relations remain invariant under the change of picture. Drawing a close analogy with classical mechanics, Dirac's insight is presented: the quantum mechanical counterpart of the classical Poisson bracket is the operator commutator divided by iℏ . The chapter concludes by deriving the Lorentz force law within the quantum framework using commutator algebra. Metadata/Keywords: Schrödinger picture, Heisenberg picture, unitary transformation, Heisenberg equation of motion, Poisson bracket, Lorentz force, time evolution, expectation values

CRC Press eBooks•Nov 5, 2025•0 citations

The Dirac picture

Dževad Belkić

In this chapter, the authors show that various pictures of quantum mechanics are interrelated by the unitary transformations. Calling upon the correspondence principle, the quantum-mechanical scattering problem would be quite analogous to the mentioned classical model. The two analysed pictures of quantum mechanics are not the only possible ones. Quite the opposite, all the unitary transformations carried out on the state vectors and the observables of the Schrödinger picture, in fact, define a new formalism of quantum mechanics. There are infinitely many such formalisms but they are all rigorously equivalent. Among all of the possible, alternative pictures of quantum mechanics, of particular importance for scattering theory is the so-called interaction picture, which was first introduced by Dirac. Hence, the alternative name: the Dirac picture.

CRC Press eBooks•Jan 15, 2020•0 citations

Time evolution of quantum systems

Dževad Belkić

In non-relativistic quantum mechanics, there exist several different ways of describing the time dependence of dynamics of physical systems. Of particular importance for quantum scattering theory are the Schrodinger, Heisenberg and Dirac pictures. For establishing a connection between quantum mechanical formalisms and classical mechanics, as well as for investigating relativistic solutions, the Heisenberg picture appears to be the most convenient. This picture of quantum mechanics is particularly adapted for the examination of free fields. The customary wave-mechanical version of quantum theory is obtained if we choose, e.g., in the framework of the Schrodinger picture to work with the coordinate representation. Possible results of measurements on a quantum system are called eigenvalues. To each of the latter values corresponds one or more eigenstates. An eigenstate is degenerate when more than one eigenstate correspond to a single eigenvalue.

CRC Press eBooks•Jan 15, 2020•0 citations
In this chapter, the authors describe the Heisenberg picture of quantum mechanics by formally accomplishing a time-dependent transformation of state vectors and operators of the Schrodinger picture. Any new picture of quantum mechanics will be acceptable, if the Schrodinger state vectors and operators are subjected to a transformation, which does not alter: the spectrum of the eigenvalues of the operators and the scalar product of an arbitrary state vector with the eigenstate vectors. These two conditions are easily fulfilled by means of the unitary transformations. The authors show that a unitary operator represents an isomorph mapping of a certain unitary vector space onto itself. Since the physical quantities measured in the experiment are, in fact, a measure of the scalar product, as implied by the definition of the probability W through the scalar product in, it is clear that the predictions based upon the new, Heisenberg picture must be identical to those obtained in the Schrodinger picture.
This chapter demonstrates how one can find the time evolution of the operators from the knowledge of the time evolution of the state vector, and vice versa. It introduces a unitary operator and discusses the concept of a unitary transformation to show how one could transfer the time dependence from the state vectors to the operators. The possibility that either the state vectors or the operators can depend explicitly on time will lead to introduce the Schrodinger, Heisenberg, and interaction pictures. The chapter discusses the fundamental differences between these pictures. It also discusses the Ehrenfest theorem, which shows under which conditions quantum mechanics predicts the same results for measured physical quantities as classical physics. It illustrates unitary transformations of an arbitrary operator Â(t) which can depend explicitly on time. Quantum mechanics produces the same result as classical mechanics for a system in which particles are represented by well-localized wave functions.
This chapter briefly explains the two elementary points concerning quantum mechanics: the mean value rule and the Heisenberg picture. The Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures are two different but equivalent sets of rules. In other words, when applied to a given physical situation they lead to the same observable predictions. In some respects the Heisenberg picture has definite technical advantages. It is particularly convenient, for instance, in quantum field theory. For describing pure cases the use of wave functions in place of kets is sometimes convenient. The mean value of an observable A and the probability that a measurement of A yields eigenvalue a k can be expressed by means of wave functions. The state vector of a system that does not undergo a measurement does not change with time, obviously this state vector is suddenly modified—also in the Heisenberg picture—when a measurement takes place.
The description of the time evolution of systems is technically known as the "Schrodinger picture." An important alternative description is the "Heisenberg picture," which indeed was the one Heisenberg used when he first formulated quantum mechanics. The Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures represent two different but equivalent sets of rules. In other words, when applied to a given physical situation they lead to the same observable predictions. In some respects, the Heisenberg picture presents definite technical advantages. It is particularly convenient, for instance, in quantum field theory. The chapter discusses work consistently with the equivalent Schrodinger set of rules. For this reason, it describes briefly the Heisenberg formulation. The chapter shows that the expressions used in the Schrodinger picture can be carried over to the Heisenberg picture. It implies, however, that the kets associated with the possible values that can be found upon measurement of an observable are themselves time-dependent kets.
This chapter explores the Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures in quantum mechanics, emphasizing their mathematical equivalence and physical consistency. The two formulations are shown to be connected by a unitary transformation. The Heisenberg equation of motion is derived, and the time evolution of operators—particularly those not explicitly dependent on time—is expressed in terms of their initial values. It is demonstrated that scalar products, expectation values, matrix elements, and commutation relations remain invariant under the change of picture. Drawing a close analogy with classical mechanics, Dirac's insight is presented: the quantum mechanical counterpart of the classical Poisson bracket is the operator commutator divided by iℏ . The chapter concludes by deriving the Lorentz force law within the quantum framework using commutator algebra. Metadata/Keywords: Schrödinger picture, Heisenberg picture, unitary transformation, Heisenberg equation of motion, Poisson bracket, Lorentz force, time evolution, expectation values
In this chapter, the authors show that various pictures of quantum mechanics are interrelated by the unitary transformations. Calling upon the correspondence principle, the quantum-mechanical scattering problem would be quite analogous to the mentioned classical model. The two analysed pictures of quantum mechanics are not the only possible ones. Quite the opposite, all the unitary transformations carried out on the state vectors and the observables of the Schrödinger picture, in fact, define a new formalism of quantum mechanics. There are infinitely many such formalisms but they are all rigorously equivalent. Among all of the possible, alternative pictures of quantum mechanics, of particular importance for scattering theory is the so-called interaction picture, which was first introduced by Dirac. Hence, the alternative name: the Dirac picture.
In non-relativistic quantum mechanics, there exist several different ways of describing the time dependence of dynamics of physical systems. Of particular importance for quantum scattering theory are the Schrodinger, Heisenberg and Dirac pictures. For establishing a connection between quantum mechanical formalisms and classical mechanics, as well as for investigating relativistic solutions, the Heisenberg picture appears to be the most convenient. This picture of quantum mechanics is particularly adapted for the examination of free fields. The customary wave-mechanical version of quantum theory is obtained if we choose, e.g., in the framework of the Schrodinger picture to work with the coordinate representation. Possible results of measurements on a quantum system are called eigenvalues. To each of the latter values corresponds one or more eigenstates. An eigenstate is degenerate when more than one eigenstate correspond to a single eigenvalue.