Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Evolution of Quantum Systems

O. Furtmaier

Published Jan 1, 2017• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.3929/ethz-b-000195295

Related papers

Time-optimal control based on path distance

Lin-Feng Du, Li‐Guo Qin, Qin Guo +2 more

The average energy and energy spread of a quantum system are two important factors that affect a system's evolution speed, which is usually defined as the changing rate of the distance between a quantum state and the state during its evolution. Alternatively, the evolution speed of a quantum system could also be studied based on its evolution path. It is found that if we define the evolution speed of a quantum unitary system as the changing rate of the path distance between a quantum state and the state during its evolution, the instantaneous evolution speed is determined by the Hamiltonian's eigenvalues, rather than its expectation value or variance imposed on any quantum state. More specifically, the range of the Hamiltonian's eigenvalues determines the evolution speed of a quantum system through the relation ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{H}=\frac{1}{2}({\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{max}\ensuremath{-}{\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{min})$, which is independent of the quantum state. Given an initial state ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{0}$ in a quantum unitary system, the minimum time required to evolve it to a target state ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{\ensuremath{\tau}}$ is ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{min}=\frac{{\mathcal{L}}_{min}({\ensuremath{\rho}}_{0},{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{\ensuremath{\tau}})}{{\ensuremath{\omega}}_{H}}$, where ${\mathcal{L}}_{min}({\ensuremath{\rho}}_{0},{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{\ensuremath{\tau}})$ is the path distance contained in the shortest evolution from ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{0}$ to ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{\ensuremath{\tau}}$. This lower bound of the evolution time is tight and achievable in a finite-energy system.

Physical Review A•Aug 13, 2025•0 citations

Evolution of Quantum Systems

Bei Zeng, Xie Chen, D. L. Zhou +1 more

Quantum science and technology•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations

Quantum Evolution

Archaeopress Publishing Ltd eBooks•May 20, 2021•0 citations

Quantifying the evolution of mixed quantum states

Andrés Marchisio, Andrea Valdés-Hernández, Natalia Giovenale +2 more

Abstract We present a measure of quantum evolution based on the degree of average distinguishability between the states visited by a quantum system over a given time interval. This measure generalizes the concept of ‘amount of evolution’ previously introduced for pure states, to arbitrary (mixed) states, thereby enabling the study of non-unitary dynamics in open quantum systems. For qubit systems, we establish fundamental relationships between the proposed evolution measure and state purity, deriving rigorous bounds for the evolution quantity. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the proposed measure admits a natural interpretation in terms of the entanglement between the system and a purifying environment, in such a way that the evolution measure globally reflects the degree of variation of the system-environment entanglement. Finally, we illustrate the behavior of the evolution measure in qubit systems interacting with an environment under paradigmatic decoherence dynamics.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Mar 9, 2026•1 citation

Time Evolution of Quantum Systems

Arno Böhm, Piotr Kielanowski, G. B. Mainland

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations

Continuous Measurement and Evolution of the Measured System

Michael B. Mensky

This chapter explores accurate formulation of the approach, including a description of the evolution of the measured system and the generalized unitarity condition for this evolution. It argues that evolution under continuous measurement has both quantum and classical features. The chapter deals with the evolution of the system subject to continuous measurement. It demonstrates in general form and considers the specific example of a free particle scattered because its position is measured. The quantum theory of measurements has been discussed not only because of its conceptual interest but also for practical purposes. The chapter discusses the application of the measurement amplitude for estimation of probabilities of different measurement outputs. However, the same amplitude can be used to describe the evolution of the system subject to the measurement. The chapter shows the continuous measurement changes the evolution of the quantum system undergoing the measurement.

CRC Press eBooks•Oct 19, 2017•0 citations
The average energy and energy spread of a quantum system are two important factors that affect a system's evolution speed, which is usually defined as the changing rate of the distance between a quantum state and the state during its evolution. Alternatively, the evolution speed of a quantum system could also be studied based on its evolution path. It is found that if we define the evolution speed of a quantum unitary system as the changing rate of the path distance between a quantum state and the state during its evolution, the instantaneous evolution speed is determined by the Hamiltonian's eigenvalues, rather than its expectation value or variance imposed on any quantum state. More specifically, the range of the Hamiltonian's eigenvalues determines the evolution speed of a quantum system through the relation ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{H}=\frac{1}{2}({\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{max}\ensuremath{-}{\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{min})$, which is independent of the quantum state. Given an initial state ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{0}$ in a quantum unitary system, the minimum time required to evolve it to a target state ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{\ensuremath{\tau}}$ is ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{min}=\frac{{\mathcal{L}}_{min}({\ensuremath{\rho}}_{0},{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{\ensuremath{\tau}})}{{\ensuremath{\omega}}_{H}}$, where ${\mathcal{L}}_{min}({\ensuremath{\rho}}_{0},{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{\ensuremath{\tau}})$ is the path distance contained in the shortest evolution from ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{0}$ to ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{\ensuremath{\tau}}$. This lower bound of the evolution time is tight and achievable in a finite-energy system.
Abstract We present a measure of quantum evolution based on the degree of average distinguishability between the states visited by a quantum system over a given time interval. This measure generalizes the concept of ‘amount of evolution’ previously introduced for pure states, to arbitrary (mixed) states, thereby enabling the study of non-unitary dynamics in open quantum systems. For qubit systems, we establish fundamental relationships between the proposed evolution measure and state purity, deriving rigorous bounds for the evolution quantity. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the proposed measure admits a natural interpretation in terms of the entanglement between the system and a purifying environment, in such a way that the evolution measure globally reflects the degree of variation of the system-environment entanglement. Finally, we illustrate the behavior of the evolution measure in qubit systems interacting with an environment under paradigmatic decoherence dynamics.
This chapter explores accurate formulation of the approach, including a description of the evolution of the measured system and the generalized unitarity condition for this evolution. It argues that evolution under continuous measurement has both quantum and classical features. The chapter deals with the evolution of the system subject to continuous measurement. It demonstrates in general form and considers the specific example of a free particle scattered because its position is measured. The quantum theory of measurements has been discussed not only because of its conceptual interest but also for practical purposes. The chapter discusses the application of the measurement amplitude for estimation of probabilities of different measurement outputs. However, the same amplitude can be used to describe the evolution of the system subject to the measurement. The chapter shows the continuous measurement changes the evolution of the quantum system undergoing the measurement.