Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Reconstructing an atomistic ortholattice from the poset of its Boolean sublattices

Carmen Constantin, Andreas Doering

Published Jun 8, 2013• 1 citation
OpenAlex

Abstract

We show that an atomic orthomodular lattice L can be reconstructed up to isomorphism from the poset B(L) of Boolean subalgebras of L. A motivation comes from quantum theory and the so-called topos approach, where one considers the poset of Boolean sublattices of L=P(H), the projection lattice of the algebra B(H) of bounded operators on Hilbert space.

Related papers

Reconstructing an atomic orthomodular lattice from the poset of its Boolean sublattices

Carmen Constantin, Doering, Andreas

We show that an atomic orthomodular lattice L can be reconstructed up to isomorphism from the poset B(L) of Boolean subalgebras of L. A motivation comes from quantum theory and the so-called topos approach, where one considers the poset of Boolean sublattices of L=P(H), the projection lattice of the algebra B(H) of bounded operators on Hilbert space.

arXiv:1306.1950•Jun 8, 2013•1 citation

Sublattices and Δ-blocks of orthomodular posets

Ivan Chajda, Helmut Länger

Abstract States of quantum systems correspond to vectors in a Hilbert space and observations to closed subspaces. Hence, this logic corresponds to the algebra of closed subspaces of a Hilbert space. This can be considered as a complete lattice with orthocomplementation, but it is not distributive. It satisfies a weaker condition, the so-called orthomodularity. Later on, it was recognized that joins in this structure need not exist provided the subspaces are not orthogonal. Hence, the resulting structure need not be a lattice but a so-called orthomodular poset, more generally an orthoposet only. For orthoposets, we introduce a binary relation $\mathrel \Delta$ and a binary operator $d(x,y)$ that are generalizations of the binary relation $\textrm{C}$ and the commutator $c(x,y)$, respectively, known for orthomodular lattices. We characterize orthomodular posets among orthogonal posets. Moreover, we describe connections between the relations $\mathrel \Delta$ and $\leftrightarrow$ (the latter was introduced by P. Pták and S. Pulmannová) and the operator $d(x,y)$. In addition, we investigate certain orthomodular posets of subsets of a finite set. In particular, we describe maximal orthomodular sublattices and Boolean subalgebras of such orthomodular posets. Finally, we study properties of $\Delta$-blocks with respect to Boolean subalgebras and distributive subposets they include.

arXiv:2004.01962•Journal of Logic and Computation•Jun 25, 2020•0 citations

Subalgebras of orthomodular lattices

John Harding, Mirko Navara

Sachs showed that a Boolean algebra is determined by its lattice of subalgebras. We establish the corresponding result for orthomodular lattices. We show that an orthomodular lattice L is determined by its lattice of subalgebras Sub(L), as well as by its poset of Boolean subalgebras BSub(L). The domain BSub(L) has recently found use in an approach to the foundations of quantum mechanics initiated by Butterfield and Isham, at least in the case where L is the orthomodular lattice of projections of a Hilbert space, or von Neumann algebra. The results here may add some additional perspective to this line of work.

arXiv:1009.4433•Sep 22, 2010•0 citations

State spaces of orthomodular structures

Mirko Navara

We present several known and one new description of orthomodular structures (orthomodular lattices, orthomodular posets and orthoalgebras). Originally, orthomodular structures were viewed as pasted families of Boolean algebras. Here we introduce semipasted families of Boolean algebras as an alternative description which is not as detailed, but substantially simplex. Semipasted families of Boolean algebras correspond to orthomodular structures in such a way that states and evaluation functionals are preserved. As semipasted families of Boolean algebras are quite general, they allow an easy construction of orthomodular structures with given state space properties. Based on this technique, we give a simplified proof of Shultz's Theorem on characterization of spaces of finitely additive states on orthomodular lattices. We also put some other results into the new context. We give a detailed exposition of the construction techniques as a tool for further applications, especially for finding counterexamples to questions about states on orthomodular structures.

•Jan 1, 2000•12 citations

Bohrification of operator algebras and quantum logic

Heunen, C, Nicolaas P. Landsman, Spitters, BAW Bas

Following Birkhoff and von Neumann, quantum logic has traditionally been based\non the lattice of closed linear subspaces of some Hilbert space, or, more generally,\non the lattice of projections in a von Neumann algebra A. Unfortunately, the logical\ninterpretation of these lattices is impaired by their nondistributivity and by various\nother problems. We show that a possible resolution of these difficulties, suggested by\nthe ideas of Bohr, emerges if instead of single projections one considers elementary\npropositions to be families of projections indexed by a partially ordered set C(A) of\nappropriate commutative subalgebras of A. In fact, to achieve both maximal generality\nand ease of use within topos theory, we assume that A is a so-called Rickart C*-algebra\nand that C(A) consists of all unital commutative Rickart C*-subalgebras of A. Such\nfamilies of projections form a Heyting algebra in a natural way, so that the associated\npropositional logic is intuitionistic: distributivity is recovered at the expense of the\nlaw of the excluded middle.\nSubsequently, generalizing an earlier computation for n×n matrices, we prove that\nthe Heyting algebra thus associated to A arises as a basis for the internal Gelfand\nspectrum (in the sense of Banaschewski–Mulvey) of the "Bohrification" A of A, which\nis a commutative Rickart C*-algebra in the topos of functors from C(A) to the category\nof sets. We explain the relationship of this construction to partial Boolean algebras\nand Bruns–Lakser completions. Finally, we establish a connection between probability\nmeasure on the lattice of projections on a Hilbert space H and probability valuations\non the internal Gelfand spectrum of A for A = B(H).

•Jan 1, 2009•28 citations

From orthoposets to orthomodular posets

John Harding, Gejza Jenda, Bert Lindenhovius

We show that the category of orthomodular posets is a full coreflective subcategory of the category of strong orthoposets, those orthoposets in which any two orthogonal elements have a join. This coreflection is obtained by building from a strong orthoposet $P$, an orthomodular poset with the same underlying set and same orthocomplementation as $P$, but with modified order. This coreflector restricts to a functor from the category of ortholattices to the category of orthomodular posets, and this functor is right adjoint.

math.COCross-listedarXiv:2607.01259•Jun 10, 2026
We show that an atomic orthomodular lattice L can be reconstructed up to isomorphism from the poset B(L) of Boolean subalgebras of L. A motivation comes from quantum theory and the so-called topos approach, where one considers the poset of Boolean sublattices of L=P(H), the projection lattice of the algebra B(H) of bounded operators on Hilbert space.
Abstract States of quantum systems correspond to vectors in a Hilbert space and observations to closed subspaces. Hence, this logic corresponds to the algebra of closed subspaces of a Hilbert space. This can be considered as a complete lattice with orthocomplementation, but it is not distributive. It satisfies a weaker condition, the so-called orthomodularity. Later on, it was recognized that joins in this structure need not exist provided the subspaces are not orthogonal. Hence, the resulting structure need not be a lattice but a so-called orthomodular poset, more generally an orthoposet only. For orthoposets, we introduce a binary relation Δ\mathrel \DeltaΔ and a binary operator d(x,y)d(x,y)d(x,y) that are generalizations of the binary relation C\textrm{C}C and the commutator c(x,y)c(x,y)c(x,y), respectively, known for orthomodular lattices. We characterize orthomodular posets among orthogonal posets. Moreover, we describe connections between the relations Δ\mathrel \DeltaΔ and ↔\leftrightarrow↔ (the latter was introduced by P. Pták and S. Pulmannová) and the operator d(x,y)d(x,y)d(x,y). In addition, we investigate certain orthomodular posets of subsets of a finite set. In particular, we describe maximal orthomodular sublattices and Boolean subalgebras of such orthomodular posets. Finally, we study properties of Δ\DeltaΔ-blocks with respect to Boolean subalgebras and distributive subposets they include.
Sachs showed that a Boolean algebra is determined by its lattice of subalgebras. We establish the corresponding result for orthomodular lattices. We show that an orthomodular lattice L is determined by its lattice of subalgebras Sub(L), as well as by its poset of Boolean subalgebras BSub(L). The domain BSub(L) has recently found use in an approach to the foundations of quantum mechanics initiated by Butterfield and Isham, at least in the case where L is the orthomodular lattice of projections of a Hilbert space, or von Neumann algebra. The results here may add some additional perspective to this line of work.
We present several known and one new description of orthomodular structures (orthomodular lattices, orthomodular posets and orthoalgebras). Originally, orthomodular structures were viewed as pasted families of Boolean algebras. Here we introduce semipasted families of Boolean algebras as an alternative description which is not as detailed, but substantially simplex. Semipasted families of Boolean algebras correspond to orthomodular structures in such a way that states and evaluation functionals are preserved. As semipasted families of Boolean algebras are quite general, they allow an easy construction of orthomodular structures with given state space properties. Based on this technique, we give a simplified proof of Shultz's Theorem on characterization of spaces of finitely additive states on orthomodular lattices. We also put some other results into the new context. We give a detailed exposition of the construction techniques as a tool for further applications, especially for finding counterexamples to questions about states on orthomodular structures.
Following Birkhoff and von Neumann, quantum logic has traditionally been based\non the lattice of closed linear subspaces of some Hilbert space, or, more generally,\non the lattice of projections in a von Neumann algebra A. Unfortunately, the logical\ninterpretation of these lattices is impaired by their nondistributivity and by various\nother problems. We show that a possible resolution of these difficulties, suggested by\nthe ideas of Bohr, emerges if instead of single projections one considers elementary\npropositions to be families of projections indexed by a partially ordered set C(A) of\nappropriate commutative subalgebras of A. In fact, to achieve both maximal generality\nand ease of use within topos theory, we assume that A is a so-called Rickart C*-algebra\nand that C(A) consists of all unital commutative Rickart C*-subalgebras of A. Such\nfamilies of projections form a Heyting algebra in a natural way, so that the associated\npropositional logic is intuitionistic: distributivity is recovered at the expense of the\nlaw of the excluded middle.\nSubsequently, generalizing an earlier computation for n×n matrices, we prove that\nthe Heyting algebra thus associated to A arises as a basis for the internal Gelfand\nspectrum (in the sense of Banaschewski–Mulvey) of the "Bohrification" A of A, which\nis a commutative Rickart C*-algebra in the topos of functors from C(A) to the category\nof sets. We explain the relationship of this construction to partial Boolean algebras\nand Bruns–Lakser completions. Finally, we establish a connection between probability\nmeasure on the lattice of projections on a Hilbert space H and probability valuations\non the internal Gelfand spectrum of A for A = B(H).
We show that the category of orthomodular posets is a full coreflective subcategory of the category of strong orthoposets, those orthoposets in which any two orthogonal elements have a join. This coreflection is obtained by building from a strong orthoposet PPP, an orthomodular poset with the same underlying set and same orthocomplementation as PPP, but with modified order. This coreflector restricts to a functor from the category of ortholattices to the category of orthomodular posets, and this functor is right adjoint.