Refutation of the no-Cloning Theorem in Statistical Models

Colin James

Published Sep 1, 2018• 0 citations

Abstract

The assumptions comprising the conjecture of the no-cloning theorem on statistical models is refuted. What follows is that the no-cloning theorem itself is also refuted.

Related papers

Quantum no-cloning theorem and entanglement

Mark G. Kuzyk

We recast the quantum no-cloning theorem in a form that preserves spin statistics and apply it to entanglement.

arXiv:1903.00030American Journal of PhysicsApr 19, 20199 citations

Bell's Theorem refuted with a Kolmogorovian counterexample

Johannes F. Geurdes

The statistics behind Bell's inequality is demonstrated to allow a Kolmogorovian (i.e. classical) model of probabilities that recovers the quantum covariance.

arXiv:0705.3378May 23, 20072 citations

Refutation of the Spin-Statistics Theorem

Colin James

Feb 1, 20190 citations

Comment on "How the No-Cloning Theorem Got its Name"

Alexander Yu. Vlasov

A review by A. Peres [quant-ph/0205076] appears recently. It is difficult to add something to such kind of fundamental themes, but here is briefly presented some ideas about challenges of the no-cloning theorem and imaginary modifications of quantum mechanics, that could make precise cloning possible.

arXiv:quant-ph/0205195May 31, 20020 citations

Cloning a Quantum in Accordance with the No‐Cloning Theorem

Richard Woesler

Physics EssaysSep 1, 20010 citations

Bell’s Theorem Refuted Mathematically for Professor X.

Gordon Watson

Bringing an elementary knowledge of sums and averages to Bell (1964), we refute Bell’s theorem.

Dec 1, 20170 citations