Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bell’s Theorem Refuted Mathematically for Professor X.

Gordon Watson

Published Dec 1, 2017• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Bringing an elementary knowledge of sums and averages to Bell (1964), we refute Bell’s theorem.

Related papers

Bell’s Theorem Refuted via Elementary Probability Theory

Gordon Watson

•Oct 1, 2020•0 citations

Refutation of Tropical Sum for Bell's Theorem

Colin James

•Nov 1, 2018•0 citations

Bell’s Theorem Refuted Irrefutably on Bell’s Own Terms

Gordon Watson

•Jul 1, 2018•0 citations

Bell's Theorem refuted, and Bell's Error corrected, all on one page

Gordon Watson

•Sep 16, 2026•0 citations

Bell’s Theorem Refuted: Based on Harry’s Analysis at Sciphysicsforums.com

Gordon Watson

Generalizing Bell 1964:(15) to realizable experiments, CHSH (1969) coined the term ‘Bell’s theorem’. Using undergraduate maths and logic, we show that Bell’s theorem and its CHSH-style variants are false (as discussed with David Mermin 1989.06.03).

•May 1, 2014•0 citations

Bell's Theorem Refuted for Stem Students

Gordon Watson

Here begins a precautionary tale from a creative life in STEM. Bringing an elementary knowledge of vectors to Bell (1964)—en route to refuting Bell’s inequality and his theorem—we aim to help STEM students study one of the strangest double-errors in the history of science. To that end we question du Sautoy’s (2016) claim that Bell’s theorem is as mathematically robust as they come.

•Nov 1, 2017•0 citations