Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in computer science

DSH: Deniable Secret Handshake Framework

Yangguang Tian, Yingjiu Li, Yinghui Zhang, Nan Li, Guomin Yang, Yong Hong Yu

Published Jan 1, 2018• 8 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-99807-7_21

Related papers

A new framework for deniable secure key exchange

Shaoquan Jiang, Yeow Meng Chee, San Ling +2 more

Information and Computation•Jan 19, 2022•3 citations

Post-quantum Asynchronous Deniable Key Exchange and the Signal Handshake

Jacqueline Brendel, Rune Fiedler, Felix Günther +2 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2022•39 citations

Beyond Secret Handshakes: Affiliation-Hiding Authenticated Key Exchange

Stanisław Jarecki, Jihye Kim, Gene Tsudik

Lecture notes in computer science•Apr 4, 2008•49 citations

Secret handshakes: Full dynamicity, deniability and lattice-based design

Zhiyuan An, Jing Pan, Yamin Wen +1 more

Theoretical Computer Science•Oct 26, 2022•6 citations

Group Secret Handshakes Or Affiliation-Hiding Authenticated Group Key Agreement

Stanisław Jarecki, Jihye Kim, Gene Tsudik

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2006•39 citations

A Deniability Analysis of Signal’s Initial Handshake PQXDH

Rune Fiedler, Christian Janson

Many use messaging apps such as Signal to exercise their right to private communication. To cope with the advent of quantum computing, Signal employs a new initial handshake protocol called PQXDH for post-quantum confidentiality, yet keeps guarantees of authenticity and deniability classical. Compared to its predecessor X3DH, PQXDH includes a KEM encapsulation and a signature on the ephemeral key. In this work we show that PQXDH does not meet the same deniability guarantees as X3DH due to the signature on the ephemeral key. Our analysis relies on plaintext awareness of the KEM, which Signal's implementation of PQXDH does not provide. As for X3DH, both parties (initiator and responder) obtain different deniability guarantees due to the asymmetry of the protocol. For our analysis of PQXDH, we introduce a new model for deniability of key exchange that allows a more fine-grained analysis. Our deniability model picks up on the ideas of prior work and facilitates new combinations of deniability notions, such as deniability against malicious adversaries in the big brother model, i.e. where the distinguisher knows all secret keys. Our model may be of independent interest.

Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies•Jul 6, 2024•7 citations
Many use messaging apps such as Signal to exercise their right to private communication. To cope with the advent of quantum computing, Signal employs a new initial handshake protocol called PQXDH for post-quantum confidentiality, yet keeps guarantees of authenticity and deniability classical. Compared to its predecessor X3DH, PQXDH includes a KEM encapsulation and a signature on the ephemeral key. In this work we show that PQXDH does not meet the same deniability guarantees as X3DH due to the signature on the ephemeral key. Our analysis relies on plaintext awareness of the KEM, which Signal's implementation of PQXDH does not provide. As for X3DH, both parties (initiator and responder) obtain different deniability guarantees due to the asymmetry of the protocol. For our analysis of PQXDH, we introduce a new model for deniability of key exchange that allows a more fine-grained analysis. Our deniability model picks up on the ideas of prior work and facilitates new combinations of deniability notions, such as deniability against malicious adversaries in the big brother model, i.e. where the distinguisher knows all secret keys. Our model may be of independent interest.