Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Volume of violation of Bell-type inequalities as a measure of nonlocality

Artur Barasiński, Mateusz Nowotarski

Published Aug 24, 2018• 15 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Motivated by the recent proposal for the quantification of the Bell nonlocality [Phys. Rev. A 92, 030101(R) (2015)], we provide an extensive analysis of this concept, namely, the volume of violation. This new measure of nonlocality has been proposed to deliver an evidence that the anomaly between maximally entangled states and states that maximally violate a Bell inequality is caused by the method, which has been applied to quantify nonlocality and the anomaly disappears when the volume of violation in used. We prove that such conclusion is not true for all bipartite quantum systems with dimension $d\ensuremath{\bigotimes}d$. In fact, if one assumes the same condition as in Phys. Rev. A 92, 030101(R) (2015), it is limited to $d\ensuremath{\le}7$. Furthermore, we discuss several type of local measurements and their influence on the quantification of nonlocality by mean of volume of violation. In particular, we propose a set of local observers that significantly enhance the volume of violation, which may have important meaning in a real-world application. Finally, we present a comparison between the volume of violation and the maximal violation of a Bell inequality.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.98.022132

Related papers

Analytic quantification of the singlet nonlocality for the first Bell inequality

Fernando Parisio

Recently an alternative way to quantifying the Bell nonlocality has been proposed [E. A. Fonseca and F. Parisio, Phys. Rev. A 92, 030101(R) (2015)]. In this work we further develop this concept, the volume of violation, and analytically calculate its value for the spin-singlet state with respect to the settings of the first Bell inequality. These settings correspond to three directions in space, or three arbitrary points on the unit sphere. It is shown that the triples of directions that lead to violations in local causality correspond to $1/3$ of all possible configurations. From the perspective of quantum communication, this means that two distant parties that were able to align their measurements in one direction only (the remaining direction in each site being random) have a probability of about $33.3%$ to certify their entanglement.

arXiv:1511.01027•Physical Review A•Mar 2, 2016•5 citations

Survey on the Bell nonlocality of a pair of entangled qudits

Alejandro Fonseca, Anna de Rosier, Tamás Vértesi +2 more

The question of how Bell nonlocality behaves in bipartite systems of higher dimensions is addressed. By employing the probability of violation of local realism under random measurements as the figure of merit, we investigate the nonlocality of entangled qudits with dimensions ranging from $d=2$ up to $d=10$. We proceed in two complementary directions. First, we study the specific Bell scenario defined by the Collins-Gisin-Linden-Massar-Popescu (CGLMP) inequality. Second, we consider the nonlocality of the same states under a more general perspective by directly addressing the space of joint probabilities (computing the frequencies of behaviours outside the local polytope). In both approaches we find that the nonlocality decreases as the dimension $d$ grows, but in quite distinct ways. While the drop in the probability of violation is exponential in the CGLMP scenario, it presents, at most, a linear decay in the space of behaviors. Furthermore, in the latter approach the states that produce maximal numeric violations in the CGLMP inequality present low probabilities of violation in comparison to maximally entangled states, so no anomaly is observed. Finally, the nonlocality of states with nonmaximal Schmidt rank is investigated.

arXiv:1805.09451•Physical Review A•Oct 3, 2018•24 citations

Towards an equivalence between maximal entanglement and maximal quantum nonlocality

Victoria Lipińska, Florian J. Curchod, Alejandro Máttar +1 more

While all bipartite pure entangled states are known to generate correlations violating a Bell inequality, and are therefore nonlocal, the quantitative relation between pure state entanglement and nonlocality is poorly understood. In fact, some Bell inequalities are maximally violated by non-maximally entangled states and this phenomenon is also observed for other operational measures of nonlocality. In this work, we study a recently proposed measure of nonlocality defined as the probability that a pure state displays nonlocal correlations when subjected to random measurements. We first prove that this measure satisfies some natural properties for an operational measure of nonlocality. Then, we show that for pure states of two qubits the measure is monotonic with entanglement for all correlation two-outcome Bell inequalities: for all these inequalities, the more the state is entangled, the larger the probability to violate them when random measurements are performed. Finally, we extend our results to the multipartite setting.

arXiv:1802.09982•New Journal of Physics•Jun 4, 2018•28 citations

Bell-nonlocality quantifiers and their persistent mismatch with the entropy of entanglement

Ari Patrick, Giulio Camillo, Fernando Parisio +1 more

For some commonly used nonlocality quantifiers, the maximally nonlocal state may not coincide with the maximally entangled state, what became known as the anomaly of nonlocality. More recently, nonanomalous quantifiers have been defined, for which maximal entanglement and maximal nonlocality do coincide. In this work we investigate in detail how these quantifiers behave for nonmaximal-resource states and show that some mismatch remains between the studied figures of merit. Besides the nonlocal volume (a quantifier that counts the volume of the set of behaviors accessible to a specific state that gives rise to nonlocality), we present an alternative quantity referring to states and based on behaviors, the trace-weighted nonlocal volume. The construction is based on the nonlocal volume integral, but weighted by a quantifier of nonlocality for behaviors (the shortest distance between the behavior and the local set). Although in all investigated scenarios the anomaly is not present, the nonlocality quantifiers as compared to the entropy of entanglement are inversely related for some set of states within some Bell scenarios. In the investigated situations this phenomenon occurs when the considered states go through a change of rank. This fact is discussed in general and illustrated through computations for the (2,3,2) scenario.

Physical Review A•Apr 7, 2023•1 citation

Measure of nonlocality which is maximal for maximally entangled qutrits

E. A. Fonseca, Fernando Parisio

There is no doubt about the fact that entanglement and nonlocality are distinct resources. It is acknowledged that a clear illustration of this point is the difference between maximally entangled states and states that maximally violate a Bell inequality. We give strong evidence that this anomaly may be an artifact of the measures that have been used to quantify nonlocality. By reasoning that the numeric value of a Bell function is akin to a witness rather than a quantifier, we define a measure of nonlocality and show that, for pairs of qutrits and of four-level systems, maximal entanglement does correspond to maximal nonlocality in the same scenario that gave rise to the discrepancy.

arXiv:1504.01601•Physical Review A•Sep 14, 2015•50 citations

Mathematically Proving Bell Nonlocality Motivated by the GHZ Argument

Qiaowei Zhang, Zhihua Guo, Huaixin Cao

Bell nonlocality of quantum states is an important resource in quantum information and then has various applications. It is usually detected by the violation of some Bell’s inequalities and the all-versus-nothing test. In the present paper, we aim to establish some mathematical methods for proving Bell nonlocality without inequalities, inspired by the work [Phys. Rev. Lett., 89, 080402 (2002)] regarding the GHZ paradox. For self-containedness, we recall the mathematical definition of Bell nonlocality proposed in [Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. 62, 030311 (2019)] and then give some basic properties on it. Then we derive some necessary conditions for a multipartite state to be Bell local and obtain some sufficient conditions for a state to be Bell nonlocal in terms of “expectations” of local observables without invoking Bell inequalities. Unlike the standard approach to nonlocality detection based on violation of Bell inequalities, the obtained criteria are formulated in terms of certain relations for expectation values of local observables that are constructed from the well-known GHZ paradoxes.

IEEE Access•Jan 1, 2021•4 citations
Motivated by the recent proposal for the quantification of the Bell nonlocality [Phys. Rev. A 92, 030101(R) (2015)], we provide an extensive analysis of this concept, namely, the volume of violation. This new measure of nonlocality has been proposed to deliver an evidence that the anomaly between maximally entangled states and states that maximally violate a Bell inequality is caused by the method, which has been applied to quantify nonlocality and the anomaly disappears when the volume of violation in used. We prove that such conclusion is not true for all bipartite quantum systems with dimension d\ensuremath⨂dd\ensuremath{\bigotimes}dd\ensuremath⨂d. In fact, if one assumes the same condition as in Phys. Rev. A 92, 030101(R) (2015), it is limited to d\ensuremath≤7d\ensuremath{\le}7d\ensuremath≤7. Furthermore, we discuss several type of local measurements and their influence on the quantification of nonlocality by mean of volume of violation. In particular, we propose a set of local observers that significantly enhance the volume of violation, which may have important meaning in a real-world application. Finally, we present a comparison between the volume of violation and the maximal violation of a Bell inequality.
Recently an alternative way to quantifying the Bell nonlocality has been proposed [E. A. Fonseca and F. Parisio, Phys. Rev. A 92, 030101(R) (2015)]. In this work we further develop this concept, the volume of violation, and analytically calculate its value for the spin-singlet state with respect to the settings of the first Bell inequality. These settings correspond to three directions in space, or three arbitrary points on the unit sphere. It is shown that the triples of directions that lead to violations in local causality correspond to 1/31/31/3 of all possible configurations. From the perspective of quantum communication, this means that two distant parties that were able to align their measurements in one direction only (the remaining direction in each site being random) have a probability of about 33.333.3%33.3 to certify their entanglement.
The question of how Bell nonlocality behaves in bipartite systems of higher dimensions is addressed. By employing the probability of violation of local realism under random measurements as the figure of merit, we investigate the nonlocality of entangled qudits with dimensions ranging from d=2d=2d=2 up to d=10d=10d=10. We proceed in two complementary directions. First, we study the specific Bell scenario defined by the Collins-Gisin-Linden-Massar-Popescu (CGLMP) inequality. Second, we consider the nonlocality of the same states under a more general perspective by directly addressing the space of joint probabilities (computing the frequencies of behaviours outside the local polytope). In both approaches we find that the nonlocality decreases as the dimension ddd grows, but in quite distinct ways. While the drop in the probability of violation is exponential in the CGLMP scenario, it presents, at most, a linear decay in the space of behaviors. Furthermore, in the latter approach the states that produce maximal numeric violations in the CGLMP inequality present low probabilities of violation in comparison to maximally entangled states, so no anomaly is observed. Finally, the nonlocality of states with nonmaximal Schmidt rank is investigated.
While all bipartite pure entangled states are known to generate correlations violating a Bell inequality, and are therefore nonlocal, the quantitative relation between pure state entanglement and nonlocality is poorly understood. In fact, some Bell inequalities are maximally violated by non-maximally entangled states and this phenomenon is also observed for other operational measures of nonlocality. In this work, we study a recently proposed measure of nonlocality defined as the probability that a pure state displays nonlocal correlations when subjected to random measurements. We first prove that this measure satisfies some natural properties for an operational measure of nonlocality. Then, we show that for pure states of two qubits the measure is monotonic with entanglement for all correlation two-outcome Bell inequalities: for all these inequalities, the more the state is entangled, the larger the probability to violate them when random measurements are performed. Finally, we extend our results to the multipartite setting.
For some commonly used nonlocality quantifiers, the maximally nonlocal state may not coincide with the maximally entangled state, what became known as the anomaly of nonlocality. More recently, nonanomalous quantifiers have been defined, for which maximal entanglement and maximal nonlocality do coincide. In this work we investigate in detail how these quantifiers behave for nonmaximal-resource states and show that some mismatch remains between the studied figures of merit. Besides the nonlocal volume (a quantifier that counts the volume of the set of behaviors accessible to a specific state that gives rise to nonlocality), we present an alternative quantity referring to states and based on behaviors, the trace-weighted nonlocal volume. The construction is based on the nonlocal volume integral, but weighted by a quantifier of nonlocality for behaviors (the shortest distance between the behavior and the local set). Although in all investigated scenarios the anomaly is not present, the nonlocality quantifiers as compared to the entropy of entanglement are inversely related for some set of states within some Bell scenarios. In the investigated situations this phenomenon occurs when the considered states go through a change of rank. This fact is discussed in general and illustrated through computations for the (2,3,2) scenario.
There is no doubt about the fact that entanglement and nonlocality are distinct resources. It is acknowledged that a clear illustration of this point is the difference between maximally entangled states and states that maximally violate a Bell inequality. We give strong evidence that this anomaly may be an artifact of the measures that have been used to quantify nonlocality. By reasoning that the numeric value of a Bell function is akin to a witness rather than a quantifier, we define a measure of nonlocality and show that, for pairs of qutrits and of four-level systems, maximal entanglement does correspond to maximal nonlocality in the same scenario that gave rise to the discrepancy.
Bell nonlocality of quantum states is an important resource in quantum information and then has various applications. It is usually detected by the violation of some Bell’s inequalities and the all-versus-nothing test. In the present paper, we aim to establish some mathematical methods for proving Bell nonlocality without inequalities, inspired by the work [Phys. Rev. Lett., 89, 080402 (2002)] regarding the GHZ paradox. For self-containedness, we recall the mathematical definition of Bell nonlocality proposed in [Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. 62, 030311 (2019)] and then give some basic properties on it. Then we derive some necessary conditions for a multipartite state to be Bell local and obtain some sufficient conditions for a state to be Bell nonlocal in terms of “expectations” of local observables without invoking Bell inequalities. Unlike the standard approach to nonlocality detection based on violation of Bell inequalities, the obtained criteria are formulated in terms of certain relations for expectation values of local observables that are constructed from the well-known GHZ paradoxes.