There is no doubt about the fact that entanglement and nonlocality are distinct resources. It is acknowledged that a clear illustration of this point is the difference between maximally entangled states and states that maximally violate a Bell inequality. We give strong evidence that this anomaly may be an artifact of the measures that have been used to quantify nonlocality. By reasoning that the numeric value of a Bell function is akin to a witness rather than a quantifier, we define a measure of nonlocality and show that, for pairs of qutrits and of four-level systems, maximal entanglement does correspond to maximal nonlocality in the same scenario that gave rise to the discrepancy.
There is no doubt about the fact that entanglement and nonlocality are distinct resources. It is acknowledged that a clear illustration of this point is the difference between maximally entangled states and states that maximally violate a Bell inequality. We give strong evidence that this anomaly may be an artifact of the measures that have been used to quantify nonlocality. By reasoning that the numeric value of a Bell function is akin to a witness rather than a quantifier, we define a measure of nonlocality and show that, for pairs of qutrits and of four-level systems, maximal entanglement does correspond to maximal nonlocality in the same scenario that gave rise to the discrepancy.
Motivated by the recent proposal for the quantification of the Bell nonlocality [Phys. Rev. A 92, 030101(R) (2015)], we provide an extensive analysis of this concept, namely, the volume of violation. This new measure of nonlocality has been proposed to deliver an evidence that the anomaly between maximally entangled states and states that maximally violate a Bell inequality is caused by the method, which has been applied to quantify nonlocality and the anomaly disappears when the volume of violation in used. We prove that such conclusion is not true for all bipartite quantum systems with dimension $d\ensuremath{\bigotimes}d$. In fact, if one assumes the same condition as in Phys. Rev. A 92, 030101(R) (2015), it is limited to $d\ensuremath{\le}7$. Furthermore, we discuss several type of local measurements and their influence on the quantification of nonlocality by mean of volume of violation. In particular, we propose a set of local observers that significantly enhance the volume of violation, which may have important meaning in a real-world application. Finally, we present a comparison between the volume of violation and the maximal violation of a Bell inequality.
While all bipartite pure entangled states are known to generate correlations violating a Bell inequality, and are therefore nonlocal, the quantitative relation between pure state entanglement and nonlocality is poorly understood. In fact, some Bell inequalities are maximally violated by non-maximally entangled states and this phenomenon is also observed for other operational measures of nonlocality. In this work, we study a recently proposed measure of nonlocality defined as the probability that a pure state displays nonlocal correlations when subjected to random measurements. We first prove that this measure satisfies some natural properties for an operational measure of nonlocality. Then, we show that for pure states of two qubits the measure is monotonic with entanglement for all correlation two-outcome Bell inequalities: for all these inequalities, the more the state is entangled, the larger the probability to violate them when random measurements are performed. Finally, we extend our results to the multipartite setting.
For some commonly used nonlocality quantifiers, the maximally nonlocal state may not coincide with the maximally entangled state, what became known as the anomaly of nonlocality. More recently, nonanomalous quantifiers have been defined, for which maximal entanglement and maximal nonlocality do coincide. In this work we investigate in detail how these quantifiers behave for nonmaximal-resource states and show that some mismatch remains between the studied figures of merit. Besides the nonlocal volume (a quantifier that counts the volume of the set of behaviors accessible to a specific state that gives rise to nonlocality), we present an alternative quantity referring to states and based on behaviors, the trace-weighted nonlocal volume. The construction is based on the nonlocal volume integral, but weighted by a quantifier of nonlocality for behaviors (the shortest distance between the behavior and the local set). Although in all investigated scenarios the anomaly is not present, the nonlocality quantifiers as compared to the entropy of entanglement are inversely related for some set of states within some Bell scenarios. In the investigated situations this phenomenon occurs when the considered states go through a change of rank. This fact is discussed in general and illustrated through computations for the (2,3,2) scenario.
Recent numerical investigations [K. P\'al and T. V\'ertesi, Phys. Rev. A 82, 022116 (2010)] suggest that the I3322 inequality, arguably the simplest extremal Bell inequality after the CHSH inequality, has a very rich structure in terms of the entangled states and measurements that maximally violate it. Here we show that for this inequality the maximally entangled state of any dimension achieves the same violation than just a single EPR pair. In contrast, stronger violations can be achieved using higher dimensional states which are less entangled. This shows that the maximally entangled state is not the most nonlocal resource, even when one restricts attention to the most simple extremal Bell inequalities.
Nonlocality and quantum entanglement constitute two special aspects of the quantum correlations existing in quantum systems, which are of paramount importance in quantum-information theory. Traditionally, they have been regarded as identical (equivalent, in fact, for pure two qubit states, that is, Gisin's Theorem ), yet they constitute different resources. Describing nonlocality by means of the violation of several Bell inequalities, we obtain by direct optimization those states of two qubits that maximally violate a Bell inequality, in terms of their degree of mixture as measured by either their participation ratio R = 1/Tr(ρ 2 ) or their maximum eigenvalue λ max . This optimum value is obtained as well, which coincides with previous results. Comparison with entanglement is performed too. An example of an application is given in the XY model. In this novel approximation, we also concentrate on the nonlocality for linear combinations of pure states of two qubits, providing a closed form for their maximal nonlocality measure. The case of Bell diagonal mixed states of two qubits is also extensively studied. Special attention concerning the connection between nonlocality and entanglement for mixed states of two qubits is paid to the so-called maximally entangled mixed states. Additional aspects for the case of two qubits are also described in detail. Since we deal with qubit systems, we will perform an analogous study for three qubits, employing similar tools. Relation between distillability and nonlocality is explored quantitatively for the whole space of states of three qubits. We finally extend our analysis to four-qubit systems, where nonlocality for generalized Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger states of arbitrary number of parties is computed.
Abstract The discrepancy between maximally entangled states and maximally non-classical quantum correlations is well-known but still not well understood. We aim to investigate the relation between quantum correlations and entanglement in a family of Bell inequalities with N -settings and d outcomes. Using analytical as well as numerical techniques, we derive both maximal quantum violations and violations obtained from maximally entangled states. Furthermore, we study the most non-classical quantum states in terms of their entanglement entropy for large values of d and many measurement settings. Interestingly, we find that the entanglement entropy behaves very differently depending on whether N = 2 or : when N = 2 the entanglement entropy is a monotone function of d and the most non-classical state is far from maximally entangled, whereas when the entanglement entropy is a non-monotone function of d and converges to that of the maximally entangled state in the limit of large d .