Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Synthese

Measurement and the Justification of the Statistical Postulate in Bohm's Causal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

J. Subramanyam

Published Dec 1, 1997• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1023/a:1005061321655

Related papers

Determinism and indeterminism in the quantum realm.

Jitendra Subramanyam

If there's one lesson that philosophers seem to have learned from quantum mechanics it is that the quantum realm is governed by indeterministic laws. However, in 1952 David Bohm constructed a deterministic theory and proved that it is empirically equivalent to quantum mechanics. One of the three conditions that are together sufficient for the empirical adequacy of Bohm's theory is the statistical postulate. This postulate demands a very particular initial condition to hold for ensembles of quantum systems. I argue that the statistical postulate requires a justification. A justification would consist of showing how the dynamics of Bohm's theory is able to generate the initial conditions specified by the statistical postulate. I examine two deterministic justifications of the statistical postulate, one by Valentini and the other by Durr, Goldstein and Zanghi. I explain precisely the ways in which they are lacking. The basic problem is that crucial dynamical details are missing, ones needed to complete the justification. Whether these missing bits can be filled in is an open question. Until a justification is at hand, and its application to real-world ensembles is clarified, the empirical adequacy of Bohm's theory remains an open question. Bohm himself proposed a stochastic or indeterministic justification for the statistical postulate. It has been shown that the dynamics of this stochastic theory does not have the resources to justify the statistical postulate. In addition I show that the mathematical argument Bohm uses in his justification is flawed. Other stochastic theories do justify the statistical postulate but have other problems. The issue of indeterminism in the quantum realm is far from settled. Bohm's deterministic dynamics enables an investigation into the limits (if any) of a deterministic dynamics for the quantum realm. The properties of Bohm's deterministic equations of motion remain largely unknown. What we do know is that if the quantum realm is indeterministic it will not be for any of the reasons we have so far been given.

•Jan 1, 1998•0 citations

On the Interpretation of Measurement within the Quantum Theory

Leon N. Cooper, Deborah van Vechten

Princeton University Press eBooks•Mar 25, 2025•0 citations

Causal Description of Measurement in Quantum Mechanics

Ulf Larsen

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences•Dec 1, 1986•2 citations

Tachyons and Quantum Statistics

Raymond Fox

A number of years ago, Bohm postulated the existence of a quantum potential in order to create a completely causal description of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics. It is shown that this quantum potential must be a tachyon field. An experimental test of the identification of tachyons with Bohm's quantum potential is described. It is shown that though in the above experiment spacelike intervals are investigated, the information arrives after timelike intervals. The experiment thus provides an example where tachyons can affect a measured quantity though they cannot be used to violate causality.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Jan 15, 1972•28 citations

David Bohm’s philosophy of science in his causal interpretation of quantum mechanics

Marja‐Liisa Kakkuri‐Knuuttila

Abstract The paper investigates David Bohm’s philosophy of science as a form of fallibilist realism that underpins his causal interpretation of quantum mechanics Bohm (Bohm 1952a, 1952b, 1984, 1985, 1988, 1989, 1990; Bohm and Hiley 1975, 1984, 1993). Bohm’s central aim is to establish the superiority of his interpretation over the standard Copenhagen framework, particularly in contrast to that of Niels Bohr. Whereas Bohr asserts that knowledge of quantum phenomena is restricted to the statistical outcomes of measurement, Bohm’s approach is distinctly realist in orientation. Responding to the challenges posed by Einstein and other physicists, Bohm relies on extra-empirical criteria such as determinism, objectivity and intelligibility. The paper develops what will be termed the methodology of intuitive intelligibility (II), consisting of four stages: (1) reformulation of the standard quantum equations, (2) physical interpretation of the mathematical symbols, (3) drawing analogies with classical laws, and (4) drawing analogies with common experience. It is argued that Bohm applies the (II) methodology consistently, with the notable exception of the ontological status of the wave function and quantum potential. In attempting to explain causal relations from a 3N-dimensional configuration space (where N is the number of particles) to familiar three-dimensional space through an appeal to ‘information’, Bohm arguably commits a category mistake. A proposed resolution—drawing on Bohm’s own holistic analogies—is supported by the recent multi-field interpretation (Romano Multi-field and Bohm’s theory. Synthese, 198(30), 10587–10609, 2021). The term fallibilist realism aptly characterizes Bohm’s stance in the philosophy of science: he repeatedly emphasizes that the causal interpretation is not intended as a final theory. Nevertheless, holism constitutes a substantive ontological commitment that he is unwilling to abandon.

Synthese•Oct 22, 2025•1 citation

On the causal interpretation of quantum mechanics

Yu. P. Rybakov

Foundations of Physics•Jun 1, 1974•17 citations
If there's one lesson that philosophers seem to have learned from quantum mechanics it is that the quantum realm is governed by indeterministic laws. However, in 1952 David Bohm constructed a deterministic theory and proved that it is empirically equivalent to quantum mechanics. One of the three conditions that are together sufficient for the empirical adequacy of Bohm's theory is the statistical postulate. This postulate demands a very particular initial condition to hold for ensembles of quantum systems. I argue that the statistical postulate requires a justification. A justification would consist of showing how the dynamics of Bohm's theory is able to generate the initial conditions specified by the statistical postulate. I examine two deterministic justifications of the statistical postulate, one by Valentini and the other by Durr, Goldstein and Zanghi. I explain precisely the ways in which they are lacking. The basic problem is that crucial dynamical details are missing, ones needed to complete the justification. Whether these missing bits can be filled in is an open question. Until a justification is at hand, and its application to real-world ensembles is clarified, the empirical adequacy of Bohm's theory remains an open question. Bohm himself proposed a stochastic or indeterministic justification for the statistical postulate. It has been shown that the dynamics of this stochastic theory does not have the resources to justify the statistical postulate. In addition I show that the mathematical argument Bohm uses in his justification is flawed. Other stochastic theories do justify the statistical postulate but have other problems. The issue of indeterminism in the quantum realm is far from settled. Bohm's deterministic dynamics enables an investigation into the limits (if any) of a deterministic dynamics for the quantum realm. The properties of Bohm's deterministic equations of motion remain largely unknown. What we do know is that if the quantum realm is indeterministic it will not be for any of the reasons we have so far been given.
A number of years ago, Bohm postulated the existence of a quantum potential in order to create a completely causal description of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics. It is shown that this quantum potential must be a tachyon field. An experimental test of the identification of tachyons with Bohm's quantum potential is described. It is shown that though in the above experiment spacelike intervals are investigated, the information arrives after timelike intervals. The experiment thus provides an example where tachyons can affect a measured quantity though they cannot be used to violate causality.
Abstract The paper investigates David Bohm’s philosophy of science as a form of fallibilist realism that underpins his causal interpretation of quantum mechanics Bohm (Bohm 1952a, 1952b, 1984, 1985, 1988, 1989, 1990; Bohm and Hiley 1975, 1984, 1993). Bohm’s central aim is to establish the superiority of his interpretation over the standard Copenhagen framework, particularly in contrast to that of Niels Bohr. Whereas Bohr asserts that knowledge of quantum phenomena is restricted to the statistical outcomes of measurement, Bohm’s approach is distinctly realist in orientation. Responding to the challenges posed by Einstein and other physicists, Bohm relies on extra-empirical criteria such as determinism, objectivity and intelligibility. The paper develops what will be termed the methodology of intuitive intelligibility (II), consisting of four stages: (1) reformulation of the standard quantum equations, (2) physical interpretation of the mathematical symbols, (3) drawing analogies with classical laws, and (4) drawing analogies with common experience. It is argued that Bohm applies the (II) methodology consistently, with the notable exception of the ontological status of the wave function and quantum potential. In attempting to explain causal relations from a 3N-dimensional configuration space (where N is the number of particles) to familiar three-dimensional space through an appeal to ‘information’, Bohm arguably commits a category mistake. A proposed resolution—drawing on Bohm’s own holistic analogies—is supported by the recent multi-field interpretation (Romano Multi-field and Bohm’s theory. Synthese, 198(30), 10587–10609, 2021). The term fallibilist realism aptly characterizes Bohm’s stance in the philosophy of science: he repeatedly emphasizes that the causal interpretation is not intended as a final theory. Nevertheless, holism constitutes a substantive ontological commitment that he is unwilling to abandon.