Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Theoretical Physics

Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering and Quantum Phase Transition in Spin Chains

Ye-Qi Zhang, Yong-Tao Sun, Qi-Liang He

Published Jul 4, 2018• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s10773-018-3817-0

Related papers

Dynamics of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering in Quantum Spin Environment

W. F. Wang, K. Wang, W. W. Cheng

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Oct 7, 2019•1 citation

Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering in Quantum Phase Transition

Chunfeng Wu, Jing‐Ling Chen, Dong-Ling Deng +3 more

We investigate the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) steering and its criticality in quantum phase transition. It is found that the EPR steerability function of the ground state of XY spin chain exhibits nonanalytic feature in the vicinity of a quantum phase transition by showing that its derivative with respect to anisotropy parameter diverges at the critical point. We then verify the universality of the critical phenomena of the EPR steerability function in the system. We also use two-qubit EPR-steering inequality to explore the relation between EPR steering and quantum phase transition.

arXiv:1201.0243•Dec 31, 2011•0 citations

Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering of quantum phases in a cavity Bose-Einstein condensate with a single impurity

Shao-Peng Jia, Baijun Li, Ya‐Feng Jiao +2 more

We study Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) steering properties of quantum phases in the generalized Dicke model (GDM) generated by a cavity Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) doped with a single impurity. It is shown that the normal and superradiant phases of the GDM exhibit much rich EPR steerability. In the normal phase, there exist one-way EPR steering from the cavity field (condensed atoms) to condensed atoms (the cavity field). In the superradiant phase, there is either one-way or two-way EPR steering for the cavity field and condensed atoms. It is found that the single impurity can act as a single-atom switch of the EPR steering to control the steering direction of one-way EPR steering and the transition between one-way and two-way EPR steering through switching on or off the impurity-BEC coupling. It is proved that the EPR steering parameters can witness the quantum phase transition (QPT) occurrence through the sudden change of the EPR steering parameters at the critical point of the QPT. Our results open a new way to manipulate macroscopic EPR steering and witness the QPT between the normal phase and the superradiant phase in the GDM through a microscopic impurity atom.

arXiv:2205.13938•May 27, 2022•1 citation

PHASE TRANSITIONS IN QUANTUM SPIN CHAINS

Jenő Sólyom

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Apr 1, 1992•0 citations

Detecting Quantum Phase Transitions in Spin Chains

Yanchao Li, Wing Chi Yu, Hai‐Qing Lin

Quantum science and technology•Jan 1, 2022•1 citation

Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen steering in critical systems

W. W. Cheng, K Wang, W F Wang +1 more

Abstract We explore Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen steering, measured by steering robustness, in the ground states of several typical models that exhibit a quantum phase transition. For the anisotropic XY model, steering robustness approaches zero around the critical point and vanishes in the ferromagnetic phase despite the fact that there exist other quantum nonlocalities, e.g. quantum entanglement. For the Heisenberg XXZ model, steering robustness exhibits some similar behavior as entanglement around the infinite-order quantum phase transition point Δ = 1, e.g. reaching its maximum. As a further example, we also consider steering robustness in the Lipkin–Meshkov–Glick collective spin model. It is then shown that steering robustness disappears at the transition point and remains at zero in the fully polarized symmetric phase, just like the behavior of entanglement and Bell nonlocality.

Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics•Jan 28, 2019•5 citations
We investigate the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) steering and its criticality in quantum phase transition. It is found that the EPR steerability function of the ground state of XY spin chain exhibits nonanalytic feature in the vicinity of a quantum phase transition by showing that its derivative with respect to anisotropy parameter diverges at the critical point. We then verify the universality of the critical phenomena of the EPR steerability function in the system. We also use two-qubit EPR-steering inequality to explore the relation between EPR steering and quantum phase transition.
We study Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) steering properties of quantum phases in the generalized Dicke model (GDM) generated by a cavity Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) doped with a single impurity. It is shown that the normal and superradiant phases of the GDM exhibit much rich EPR steerability. In the normal phase, there exist one-way EPR steering from the cavity field (condensed atoms) to condensed atoms (the cavity field). In the superradiant phase, there is either one-way or two-way EPR steering for the cavity field and condensed atoms. It is found that the single impurity can act as a single-atom switch of the EPR steering to control the steering direction of one-way EPR steering and the transition between one-way and two-way EPR steering through switching on or off the impurity-BEC coupling. It is proved that the EPR steering parameters can witness the quantum phase transition (QPT) occurrence through the sudden change of the EPR steering parameters at the critical point of the QPT. Our results open a new way to manipulate macroscopic EPR steering and witness the QPT between the normal phase and the superradiant phase in the GDM through a microscopic impurity atom.
Abstract We explore Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen steering, measured by steering robustness, in the ground states of several typical models that exhibit a quantum phase transition. For the anisotropic XY model, steering robustness approaches zero around the critical point and vanishes in the ferromagnetic phase despite the fact that there exist other quantum nonlocalities, e.g. quantum entanglement. For the Heisenberg XXZ model, steering robustness exhibits some similar behavior as entanglement around the infinite-order quantum phase transition point Δ = 1, e.g. reaching its maximum. As a further example, we also consider steering robustness in the Lipkin–Meshkov–Glick collective spin model. It is then shown that steering robustness disappears at the transition point and remains at zero in the fully polarized symmetric phase, just like the behavior of entanglement and Bell nonlocality.