Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The European Physical Journal D

Driving the quantum speed limit of a central spin model by pulse control

Lu Hou, Yong-Bo Wei, Bin Shao, Jian Zou

Published Jul 1, 2018• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1140/epjd/e2018-90115-x

Related papers

Quantum Speed Limit for Dynamics of Central Spin Model with Initial System-Bath Correlations

Wen-Jian Yu, Yong-Bo Wei, Hai Li +3 more

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Jul 8, 2016•4 citations

Pulse Control Assisted Dynamical Decoupling in a Central Spin Model

Zhao‐Yan Li, Yong-Bo Wei, Zhao-Ming Wang +3 more

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Feb 28, 2017•0 citations

Transitionless quantum driving for spin systems

和孝 高橋, Kazutaka Takahashi

•Jun 1, 2013•0 citations

Probing the Weak-Driving Quantum Speed Limit via Drift-Aware Shooting Methods

Denis Janković, Saba Taherpour, Paul-Louis Etienney +2 more

A central goal of quantum optimal control is to achieve high-fidelity and low-energy control pulses. When quantum optimal control methods optimize every point of a pulse discretized over small time steps independently this can yield high fidelity control but also results in broadband and energy-hungry waveforms. We extend MAGICARP, a shooting method inspired by Pontryagin's maximum principle on energy that generates an entire pulse from a small set of parameters, making it smooth and energy-efficient by construction, from driftless systems to closed systems with the constant drift Hamiltonian of two exchange-coupled spins in an external magnetic field. The optimization proceeds in stages: the dressed states of the drift Hamiltonian structure the target, an initial shooting optimization is performed in the rotating-wave frame, and an exact laboratory-frame refinement follows. Benchmarked against Krotov and GRAPE at matched gate infidelity, MAGICARP consistently achieves the lowest energy and a conserved pulse area, concentrates its spectral weight on the gate-relevant transitions, and is the most robust to fluctuations in the exchange coupling; GRAPE independently converges to essentially the same pulse while black-box Krotov meets the same error at an order-of-magnitude energy premium. This method-independence is what qualifies the bounded solver as a measurement instrument, and the central result follows: a large statistical survey of unselected optimization runs resolves a weak-driving quantum speed limit for two exchange-coupled electron spins: low-amplitude realizations of the two-qubit quantum Fourier transform cease to exist below a critical gate time, and the minimum control energy diverges on approach to this limit. The divergence obeys a simple two-parameter area--pole law, $E_2^{\mathrm{law}}(T)=A/T+B/(T-T^*)$.

quant-pharXiv:2606.22212•Jun 23, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Correlations and Speed Limit of Central Spin Systems

Devvrat Tiwari, K. G. Paulson, Subhashish Banerjee

Abstract In this article, single, and two‐qubit central spin systems interacting with spin baths are considered and their dynamical properties are discussed. The cases of interacting and non‐interacting spin baths are considered and the quantum speed limit (QSL) time of evolution is investigated. The impact of the size of the spin bath on the quantum speed limit for a single qubit central spin model is analyzed. The quantum correlations for (non‐)interacting two central spin qubits are estimated and their dynamical behavior with that of QSL time under various conditions are compared. How QSL time could be availed to analyze the dynamics of quantum correlations is shown.

arXiv:2205.13195•Annalen der Physik•Jan 15, 2023•16 citations

Fast adiabatic control near the quantum speed limit

Jonathan Vandermause, Chandrasekhar Ramanathan

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Jun 6, 2017•0 citations
A central goal of quantum optimal control is to achieve high-fidelity and low-energy control pulses. When quantum optimal control methods optimize every point of a pulse discretized over small time steps independently this can yield high fidelity control but also results in broadband and energy-hungry waveforms. We extend MAGICARP, a shooting method inspired by Pontryagin's maximum principle on energy that generates an entire pulse from a small set of parameters, making it smooth and energy-efficient by construction, from driftless systems to closed systems with the constant drift Hamiltonian of two exchange-coupled spins in an external magnetic field. The optimization proceeds in stages: the dressed states of the drift Hamiltonian structure the target, an initial shooting optimization is performed in the rotating-wave frame, and an exact laboratory-frame refinement follows. Benchmarked against Krotov and GRAPE at matched gate infidelity, MAGICARP consistently achieves the lowest energy and a conserved pulse area, concentrates its spectral weight on the gate-relevant transitions, and is the most robust to fluctuations in the exchange coupling; GRAPE independently converges to essentially the same pulse while black-box Krotov meets the same error at an order-of-magnitude energy premium. This method-independence is what qualifies the bounded solver as a measurement instrument, and the central result follows: a large statistical survey of unselected optimization runs resolves a weak-driving quantum speed limit for two exchange-coupled electron spins: low-amplitude realizations of the two-qubit quantum Fourier transform cease to exist below a critical gate time, and the minimum control energy diverges on approach to this limit. The divergence obeys a simple two-parameter area--pole law, E2law(T)=A/T+B/(T−T∗)E_2^{\mathrm{law}}(T)=A/T+B/(T-T^*)E2law​(T)=A/T+B/(T−T∗).
Abstract In this article, single, and two‐qubit central spin systems interacting with spin baths are considered and their dynamical properties are discussed. The cases of interacting and non‐interacting spin baths are considered and the quantum speed limit (QSL) time of evolution is investigated. The impact of the size of the spin bath on the quantum speed limit for a single qubit central spin model is analyzed. The quantum correlations for (non‐)interacting two central spin qubits are estimated and their dynamical behavior with that of QSL time under various conditions are compared. How QSL time could be availed to analyze the dynamics of quantum correlations is shown.