Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The phase in quantum evolution

Ravi Baijulal Bhandari

Published Jan 1, 1997• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Geometric aspects of noncyclic quantum evolutions

Arun Kumar Pati

The geometric phase is defined for any arbitrary quantum evolution using a ``reference section'' of the bundle covering the curve in the projective Hilbert space. A canonical one-form is defined whose line integral gives the desired geometric phase. It is manifestly gauge, phase, and reparametrization invariant for all quantum evolutions. A simple proof of the vanishing nature of the geometric phase along the geodesic is given. Also, an elementary proof of the nonadditive nature of the geometric phase is given. In the limit of cyclic evolution of a pure quantum state, this phase reduces to the Aharonov and Anandan phase, precisely. It is observed that in addition to the geometric phase, other geometric structures exist, such as the ``length'' and ``distance'' during any arbitrary quantum evolution. The relations among all of these geometric quantities are pointed out. Finally, two simple examples are studied to illustrate the ideas introduced in this paper.

Physical Review A•Oct 1, 1995•172 citations

Quantum Evolution

Archaeopress Publishing Ltd eBooks•May 20, 2021•0 citations

Quantum Speed-Up Induced by the Quantum Phase Transition in a Nonlinear Dicke Model with Two Impurity Qubits

Wangjun Lu, Cuilu Zhai, Yan Liu +4 more

In this paper, we investigate the effect of the Dicke quantum phase transition on the speed of evolution of the system dynamics. At the phase transition point, the symmetry associated with the system parity operator begins to break down. By comparing the magnitudes of the two types of quantum speed limit times, we find that the quantum speed limit time of the system is described by one of the quantum speed limit times, whether in the normal or superradiant phase. We find that, in the normal phase, the strength of the coupling between the optical field and the atoms has little effect on the dynamical evolution speed of the system. However, in the superradiant phase, a stronger atom–photon coupling strength can accelerate the system dynamics’ evolution. Finally, we investigate the effect of the entanglement of the initial state of the system on the speed of evolution of the system dynamics. We find that in the normal phase, the entanglement of the initial state of the system has almost no effect on the system dynamics’ evolution speed. However, in the superradiant phase, larger entanglement of the system can accelerate the evolution of the system dynamics. Furthermore, we verify the above conclusions by the actual evolution of the system.

Symmetry•Dec 15, 2022•1 citation

Quantum evolution

Nature Photonics•Nov 30, 2009•7 citations

The Quantum Evolution

Alex Khang, Kali Charan Rath

CRC Press eBooks•Aug 2, 2024•17 citations

Evolution Operator Can Always Be Separated into the Product of Holonomy and Dynamic Operators

Xiao‐Dong Yu, D. M. Tong

The geometric phase is a fundamental quantity characterizing the holonomic feature of quantum systems. It is well known that the evolution operator of a quantum system undergoing a cyclic evolution can be simply written as the product of holonomic and dynamical components for the three special cases concerning the Berry phase, adiabatic non-Abelian geometric phase, and nonadiabatic Abelian geometric phase. However, for the most general case concerning the nonadiabatic non-Abelian geometric phase, how to separate the evolution operator into holonomic and dynamical components is a long-standing open problem. In this Letter, we solve this open problem. We show that the evolution operator of a quantum system can always be separated into the product of holonomy and dynamic operators. Based on it, we further derive a matrix representation of this separation formula for cyclic evolution, and give a necessary and sufficient condition for a general evolution being purely holonomic. Our finding is not only of theoretical interest itself, but also of vital importance for the application of quantum holonomy. It unifies the representations of all four types of evolution concerning the adiabatic/nonadiabatic Abelian/non-Abelian geometric phase, and provides a general approach to realizing purely holonomic evolution.

arXiv:2311.09597•Physical Review Letters•Nov 15, 2023•11 citations
The geometric phase is defined for any arbitrary quantum evolution using a ``reference section'' of the bundle covering the curve in the projective Hilbert space. A canonical one-form is defined whose line integral gives the desired geometric phase. It is manifestly gauge, phase, and reparametrization invariant for all quantum evolutions. A simple proof of the vanishing nature of the geometric phase along the geodesic is given. Also, an elementary proof of the nonadditive nature of the geometric phase is given. In the limit of cyclic evolution of a pure quantum state, this phase reduces to the Aharonov and Anandan phase, precisely. It is observed that in addition to the geometric phase, other geometric structures exist, such as the ``length'' and ``distance'' during any arbitrary quantum evolution. The relations among all of these geometric quantities are pointed out. Finally, two simple examples are studied to illustrate the ideas introduced in this paper.
In this paper, we investigate the effect of the Dicke quantum phase transition on the speed of evolution of the system dynamics. At the phase transition point, the symmetry associated with the system parity operator begins to break down. By comparing the magnitudes of the two types of quantum speed limit times, we find that the quantum speed limit time of the system is described by one of the quantum speed limit times, whether in the normal or superradiant phase. We find that, in the normal phase, the strength of the coupling between the optical field and the atoms has little effect on the dynamical evolution speed of the system. However, in the superradiant phase, a stronger atom–photon coupling strength can accelerate the system dynamics’ evolution. Finally, we investigate the effect of the entanglement of the initial state of the system on the speed of evolution of the system dynamics. We find that in the normal phase, the entanglement of the initial state of the system has almost no effect on the system dynamics’ evolution speed. However, in the superradiant phase, larger entanglement of the system can accelerate the evolution of the system dynamics. Furthermore, we verify the above conclusions by the actual evolution of the system.
The geometric phase is a fundamental quantity characterizing the holonomic feature of quantum systems. It is well known that the evolution operator of a quantum system undergoing a cyclic evolution can be simply written as the product of holonomic and dynamical components for the three special cases concerning the Berry phase, adiabatic non-Abelian geometric phase, and nonadiabatic Abelian geometric phase. However, for the most general case concerning the nonadiabatic non-Abelian geometric phase, how to separate the evolution operator into holonomic and dynamical components is a long-standing open problem. In this Letter, we solve this open problem. We show that the evolution operator of a quantum system can always be separated into the product of holonomy and dynamic operators. Based on it, we further derive a matrix representation of this separation formula for cyclic evolution, and give a necessary and sufficient condition for a general evolution being purely holonomic. Our finding is not only of theoretical interest itself, but also of vital importance for the application of quantum holonomy. It unifies the representations of all four types of evolution concerning the adiabatic/nonadiabatic Abelian/non-Abelian geometric phase, and provides a general approach to realizing purely holonomic evolution.