Comment on: Observation of a quantum Cheshire Cat in a matter-wave interferometer experiment
W. M. Stuckey, Michael Silberstein, Timothy J. McDevitt
Abstract
In a July 2014 Nature Communications paper, Denkmayr et al. claim to have instantiated so-called quantum Cheshire Cat experiment using neutron interferometry. Crucial to this claim are weak values which must imply quantum Cheshire Cat interpretation, i.e., the neutron and its spin are spatially separated in their experiment. While they measured correct weak values for quantum Cheshire Cat interpretation, corresponding implications do not obtain because, as we show, those weak values were measured with both a quadratic and a linear magnetic field Bz interaction. We show explicitly how those weak values imply quantum Cheshire Cat if Bz interaction is linear and then we show how quadratic Bz interaction destroys quantum Cheshire Cat implications of those weak values. Since both linear and quadratic Bz interactions contribute equally to neutron intensity in this experiment, deviant weak value implications are unavoidable. Because weak values were used successfully to compute neutron intensities for weak Bz in this experiment, it is clearly case that one cannot make ontological inferences from weak values without taking into account corresponding interaction strength.