Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Ubiquity The Journal of Pervasive Media

Atemporality, art, quantum phenomena and the jester

Paul Thomas

Published Jun 1, 2016• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract Contemporary physics, with its use of probability and uncertainty, has affected the way artists perceive and interpret the world. The impact of probability and uncertainty were initially challenged and explored by the Futurists and Dadaists at the beginning of the twentieth century. This article explores the analogous relationship between art and quantum phenomena such as the delayed choice quantum eraser (DCQE) and multiworlds. How artist when observing the world, translates it in to marks that measure the world and in that act, alter what they really see.

DOI
10.1386/ubiq.5.1.25_1

Related papers

Quantum Reflection

Paul Thomas

The article explores parallels between quantum evolution and developments taking place in the fine arts. Chance, uncertainty, probability, and intuition are all hallmarks of expression across the fields of both art and scientific practice. The role of the observer in art and science is explored through a comparative study between the act of fine art drawing and quantum measurement. What is meant by the role of the observer to the very act of seeing. The observer draws away a veil of inadequacy in looking for reality. The article reflects on the process of drawing’s comparative relationship the role of the observer in art and science. This role of the observer is analysed in relation to delayed choice quantum erasure, probability, indeterminacy, counterfactual definitiveness, entanglement, superposition, and the classical quantum divide, through the artist’s act of mark-making. There is a need for an attentive gaze when confronting so-called truths. Intentional repositioning and reframing of science practices through art can promote exploration of different ways of visualising, perceiving, understanding, communicating, and acting in the material world. In so doing the article describes a “quantum drawing” workshop created for art and science practitioners. The workshop is a new model for facilitating a transdisciplinary development of alternative domains and discourses that garner insights from the act of seeing and understanding. The workshop explores visual expression, material interaction and embodied practices speculating on quantum intuition, quantum computing and infinite speed. The article defines the quantisation of drawing as a tool for unpacking the role of the observer in art and science to embrace uncertainty.

•Jan 1, 2022•0 citations

Quantum Duration

Paul Thomas

The influence of cultural and scientific events on artists’ styles has long intrigued theorists and historians, especially concerning the art movements of the 20th century in Europe. One such connection often discussed is the relationship between Einstein’s theory of relativity and Picasso’s exploration of space and time. Scholars such as Henderson (1983) and Miller (2001) have documented these connections, speculating on whether Picasso drew inspiration from the scientific community of his time or whether his work shaped perceptions of four-dimensional space. While such conjectures are insightful, they also prompt us to consider the broader range of influences affecting artists at any given moment.

Routledge eBooks•Oct 20, 2025•0 citations

Art of the Quantum Moment

Robert P. Crease and Alfred S. Goldhaber

For half a dozen years, the two of us have taught “The Quantum Moment,” a course on the impact of quantum mechanics on culture and thought. The impact on art is one key topic of this course, and we discuss several different ways in which art of the quantum moment is intertwined with mathematics. Much of this has to do with various mathematical consequences of the fundamental quantum equation E = hν, which by various paths is responsible for complementarity, randomness, uncertainty, and alternate worlds, among other features that have shown up in art. Sometimes the connection to mathematics involves reimaginations, sometimes transformations and reconstructions, sometimes metaphors, and sometimes mere evocations. On the one hand there are incredibly precise and reproducible patterns, of which the earliest may have been spectrum of a hydrogen atom treated as a non-relativistic system. On the other hand, there are the random results of particle observations, such as the locations of strikes of individual photons in a diffraction pattern, which nevertheless in the limit of large numbers of photons becomes extremely precise and regular. Thus quantum mechanics, as well as the art it inspires, has a richness that invites us to expect a substantial future for artistic expressions of The Quantum Moment.

Proceedings of Bridges 2012: Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture, Culture•Jan 1, 2012•1 citation

Art makes quantum intuitive

Grégoire Cattan, Karolina Duś, Sławomir Kuśmia +1 more

Not so long ago, humans were a group of primates living on the savannah. We are reasonably proficient at estimating the trajectory of medium-sized objects, such as falling rocks and arrows, moving at moderate speeds. However, one must acknowledge that our intuition falters when it comes to understanding the behaviour of micro objects moving at very high speeds.Consider, for instance, the famous double-slit experiment. If you throw a ball towards two slits, the ball will pass through one slit, according to a common-sense prediction. However, when small particles, such as photons or electrons, are projected through two closely spaced apertures, the result is as if the particles simultaneously pass through the two apertures. In quantum physics, this unintuitive observation is explained by the wave-particle duality. It means that, physical entities can possess wavelike as well as particle-like characteristics. The duality is analogous to the two sides of a coin; the same reality can be described from different perspectives. Unfortunately, this knowledge does not cause that quantum mechanisms are entirely understandable and intuitional. Therefore, the following question remains open, how can we define quantum art when we are unable to fully grasp quantum mechanics? On a similar note, art itself is challenging to understand, albeit for different reasons. It is widely accepted that art is, to a significant extent, a subjective experience. An artist creates a piece of art that evokes diverse emotions and interpretations when presented to different people. Consequently, how can we bridge the gap between quantum mechanics, which is primarily comprehended through mathematics, and art, which is intuitively understood without the need for conscious reasoning? In other words, how can quantum art make the enigmatic world of quantum more intuitive and accessible?To address these questions, we created a challenge for the HackYeah! hackathon, one of the most prominent stationary events in Europe. We invited people to find an artistic way to illustrate the principles of quantum mechanics, including quantum superposition, entanglement, and decoherence. Approximately 700 individuals attended the event. Multiple challenges were submitted by different companies, and the Quantum Art challenge was chosen by 15 teams that ranged in size from two to seven people. After a short description of the challenge in Section 2, we explore some of these contributions in Section 3. Lastly, Section 4 concludes the paper. In our opinion, the artwork presented, especially the visual ones, helped to makes quantum principles more understandable, intuitive.The purpose of the challenge was to find an artistic way to illustrate quantum mechanics, specifically quantum superposition, entanglement, and decoherence.Quantum superposition refers to a phenomenon where a single particle can exist in two states simultaneously. In contrast to a 'normal' bit, which can be either 0 or 1, a quantum bit is a superposition of both 0 and 1.The measurement operation is the process through which a quantum state is collapsed to either the state 0 or 1. Let us consider two quantum bits; the possible measurement outcomes can be one of the following four combinations: 00, 01, 10, or 11. When only two of these combinations are possible, such as 00 and 11 or 10 and 01, one can state that the quantum bits are entangled because the state of one qubit affects the state of the second qubit and vice-versa.Decoherence of the quantum state is an effect that results from microscopic interactions between the quantum bits and the environment. This environmental noise impacts the state of the quantum bits and can lead to errors in computation. In other words, multiple measurements of the same quantum computation may yield different results. Different quantum computer architectures exhibit varying levels of noise.Here, the following question arises: How can people represent the principles of quantum mechanics in a way that it is tangible, visible, or even audible?In this section, we present a selected panel of examples that were implemented during the HackYeah! hackathon.This project effectively demonstrates the concept of quantum decoherence. It showcases a mosaic in which the arrangement of image elements is determined by the outcomes of quantum measurements (Figure 1). Various mosaics are generated following these measurements and are subsequently combined into an animated GIF. Notably, the greater the instability of the quantum computer, the more pronounced the glitches become within the mosaic. As a testament to its excellence, this project emerged as the winner of the challenge. The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/lukilesny/quantmosaic.This code is based on the previous quantum art of Wiktor Mazin, 1 which exploits the Julia fractal set for image generation. Julia fractals are fractals based on a recursive suite of a complex number.The code performs a straightforward computation that involves the measurement of two qubits. The probabilities of these qubits being in either state 0 or 1 are employed to initialise the real and imaginary part of the complex numbers in the Julia set. The resulting Julia fractal is presented as an image, which is then further customised through user input. This customised image is subsequently passed to the text-to-image artificial intelligence model Stable Diffusion to create both personalised and quantum artwork. This project also illustrates the concept of quantum decoherence. The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/Havystar/QUANTIUM.This work is also inspired by the contributions of Wiktor Mazin; however, it diverges by focusing on the creation of music rather than images. It resonates with the European project on Quantum Music2 (e.g., (1)), with the distinction being that instead of encoding notes into quantum states, it employs fractals to generate eight distinct musical notes.The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/kmazrolina/Quanterpoint.This project is also an application of quantum music. It breaks down musical compositions into 4/4 tempo measures. Each measure is encoded using a set of four qubit quantum circuits, with each quantum bit symbolising a distinct musical element, encompassing notes, rhythm, and pauses. Diverse variations of a melody are generated, each of which is closely tied to a specific quantum architecture. It is akin to experiencing music through a quantum lens that unveils the distinctive quantum voice of each architecture.The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/git-stashic/quantum-art.This project serves as an in-depth exploration of variational quantum circuits (VQCs) applied to the classification of the IRIS dataset. The classification results are then presented through Seaborn graphs (a library for scientific visualisation). This project is classified as scientific visualisation rather than art, but the effort merits our attention. A similar approach with VQCs can be observed in the pyRiemann-qiskit library (2), as showcased in the library documentation. 3 In this example, the learning parameters of the VQC are ingeniously illustrated as a spiral, with each branch signifying the variation in weight of a specific parameter.Additionally, the project delves into Bubble Art, drawing inspiration from the work of Radha Pyari Sandhir. 4 The core concept involves encoding a string into qubits and subsequently measuring the outcomes of computations performed on them. The resulting measurements are then transformed into bubbles. The size and number of bubbles convey information, with smaller, numerous bubbles indicating more noise, while larger bubbles represent measurements that yield the same results.The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/dr3du4/Quantium.Autoencoders are a class of neural networks that are commonly employed to extract an efficient representation of specific data, akin to dimension reduction techniques. In this particular scenario, the team proposed the use of a variational autoencoder, with its parameters initialised with the measurement of a quantum circuit. The autoencoder's purpose is to learn a concise representation of a cat by using the Kaggle CAT dataset. Dimensionality reduction essentially serves as a means of compressing the data, resulting in a deliberately artistic blurring or fuzziness effect on the original image.The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/polish-mountain/quantum-vae.Here, the concept revolves around the initialisation of a quantum circuit with brain wave frequencies, such as alpha and beta waves. Quantum operations are run on these states, and the outputs are measured in classical bits. Then, the resulting measurements are translated into values of saturation and luminance, ultimately contributing to the customisation of a piece of artwork.Essentially, it can be described as an electroencephalography (EEG) state personalised through quantum randomness. What makes this idea particularly intriguing is its potential for expansion. By introducing different qubits that represent the mental states of other users, brain synchronisation could be further represented by entangled states. When two users are competing or cooperating to solve a task, the synchronization between their mental states only allow for certain measurement probabilities, which is akin to a form of entanglement. This notion also resonates with the concept of the quantum brain hypothesis (3), according to which the brain coexists in multiple states simultaneously, which subsequently collapse. In this idea, EEG measurements become a measurement of these quantum brain states, and the task executed by the user while recording the electroencephalogram could be further represented by specific quantum operations. Just to be clear, we do not pretend that this is actually the case, but this project could lead to interesting metaphors between brain states and quantum representation.The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/kinga-marszalkowska/QuantumBrainArt.Various artistic viewpoints were submitted as part of the Quantum Art challenge at the HackYeah! hackathon, including images, animations, and music. By far, quantum decoherence -that is, quantum noise -was the most exploited quantum concept. While quantum superposition was used internally, it was not -in our opinion -sufficiently highlighted by the presented artworks. As for quantum entanglement, it was explored under the concept of quantum music. Apparently, it is not always intuitive for people to understand quantum entanglement simply by hearing music. Saying that, you need a certain level of knowledge to build appreciation. For example, children need to learn different tastes to appreciate food. Among the aforementioned works, we noticed the use of quantum principles for creating artistic visualisations of mental states through EEG, as well as the use of art to enhance the visualisation of machine learning techniques. Here, we see art's potential to enhance the comprehensibility and natural intuition of quantum phenomena. This is an interesting approach to make quantum more accessible, intuitive, especially for neophytes.The question that lingers is whether visualisation truly qualifies as art. The answer is nuanced and may rely on the intent itself. A good visualisation can be a piece of art if the machine learning model was created with the sole purpose of producing art rather than for merely explaining a machine learning algorithm.Another perspective is that of Japanese contemporary artist Matsuzawa Yutaka (1922-2006), although we admit that we have not had the opportunity to read the original Japanese text. Our understanding is based on the writings of Alan Longino from the Department of Art at the University of Chicago (4):"Trough Quantum Art, Matsuzawa invited future readers, viewers, and participants to conceive of a world where objects, bodies, images, and matter become less defined, more permeable, and bound together in limitless intimacy".In essence, the artist's manifesto is a call for renewal, a break from artistic conventions, similar to the role of quantum physics in the physical sciences.

Frontiers in Quantum Science and Technology•May 17, 2024•2 citations

Time and the Quantum: Erasing the Past and Impacting the Future

Yakir Aharonov, Muhammad Suhail Zubairy

The quantum eraser effect of Scully and Drühl dramatically underscores the difference between our classical conceptions of time and how quantum processes can unfold in time. Such eyebrow-raising features of time in quantum mechanics have been labeled "the fallacy of delayed choice and quantum eraser" on the one hand and described "as one of the most intriguing effects in quantum mechanics" on the other. In the present paper, we discuss how the availability or erasure of information generated in the past can affect how we interpret data in the present. The quantum eraser concept has been studied and extended in many different experiments and scenarios, for example, the entanglement quantum eraser, the kaon quantum eraser, and the use of quantum eraser entanglement to improve microscopic resolution.

Science•Feb 10, 2005•94 citations

Structural constraint on delayed-choice quantum eraser architectures

Chakir Fikri

Delayed-choice quantum eraser (DCQE) experiments are often presented as challenging classical causal intuitions by correlating detection events with choices implemented at later times. While it is well understood that post-selection plays a crucial role in producing the observed interference patterns, the structural features underlying such correlations are rarely analyzed within a unified framework. In this work, we introduce a simple probabilistic constraint applicable to idealized DCQE architectures. We show that four intuitive properties -- statistical independence of the choice, absence of losses, deterministic routing conditioned on the choice, and distinct conditional detection distributions -- cannot be simultaneously satisfied. This incompatibility provides a transparent classification of DCQE schemes and clarifies how conditional interference patterns arise without invoking exotic mechanisms.

quant-pharXiv:2605.24994•Physica Scripta•May 26, 2026•0 citations
Abstract Contemporary physics, with its use of probability and uncertainty, has affected the way artists perceive and interpret the world. The impact of probability and uncertainty were initially challenged and explored by the Futurists and Dadaists at the beginning of the twentieth century. This article explores the analogous relationship between art and quantum phenomena such as the delayed choice quantum eraser (DCQE) and multiworlds. How artist when observing the world, translates it in to marks that measure the world and in that act, alter what they really see.
The article explores parallels between quantum evolution and developments taking place in the fine arts. Chance, uncertainty, probability, and intuition are all hallmarks of expression across the fields of both art and scientific practice. The role of the observer in art and science is explored through a comparative study between the act of fine art drawing and quantum measurement. What is meant by the role of the observer to the very act of seeing. The observer draws away a veil of inadequacy in looking for reality. The article reflects on the process of drawing’s comparative relationship the role of the observer in art and science. This role of the observer is analysed in relation to delayed choice quantum erasure, probability, indeterminacy, counterfactual definitiveness, entanglement, superposition, and the classical quantum divide, through the artist’s act of mark-making. There is a need for an attentive gaze when confronting so-called truths. Intentional repositioning and reframing of science practices through art can promote exploration of different ways of visualising, perceiving, understanding, communicating, and acting in the material world. In so doing the article describes a “quantum drawing” workshop created for art and science practitioners. The workshop is a new model for facilitating a transdisciplinary development of alternative domains and discourses that garner insights from the act of seeing and understanding. The workshop explores visual expression, material interaction and embodied practices speculating on quantum intuition, quantum computing and infinite speed. The article defines the quantisation of drawing as a tool for unpacking the role of the observer in art and science to embrace uncertainty.
The influence of cultural and scientific events on artists’ styles has long intrigued theorists and historians, especially concerning the art movements of the 20th century in Europe. One such connection often discussed is the relationship between Einstein’s theory of relativity and Picasso’s exploration of space and time. Scholars such as Henderson (1983) and Miller (2001) have documented these connections, speculating on whether Picasso drew inspiration from the scientific community of his time or whether his work shaped perceptions of four-dimensional space. While such conjectures are insightful, they also prompt us to consider the broader range of influences affecting artists at any given moment.
For half a dozen years, the two of us have taught “The Quantum Moment,” a course on the impact of quantum mechanics on culture and thought. The impact on art is one key topic of this course, and we discuss several different ways in which art of the quantum moment is intertwined with mathematics. Much of this has to do with various mathematical consequences of the fundamental quantum equation E = hν, which by various paths is responsible for complementarity, randomness, uncertainty, and alternate worlds, among other features that have shown up in art. Sometimes the connection to mathematics involves reimaginations, sometimes transformations and reconstructions, sometimes metaphors, and sometimes mere evocations. On the one hand there are incredibly precise and reproducible patterns, of which the earliest may have been spectrum of a hydrogen atom treated as a non-relativistic system. On the other hand, there are the random results of particle observations, such as the locations of strikes of individual photons in a diffraction pattern, which nevertheless in the limit of large numbers of photons becomes extremely precise and regular. Thus quantum mechanics, as well as the art it inspires, has a richness that invites us to expect a substantial future for artistic expressions of The Quantum Moment.
Not so long ago, humans were a group of primates living on the savannah. We are reasonably proficient at estimating the trajectory of medium-sized objects, such as falling rocks and arrows, moving at moderate speeds. However, one must acknowledge that our intuition falters when it comes to understanding the behaviour of micro objects moving at very high speeds.Consider, for instance, the famous double-slit experiment. If you throw a ball towards two slits, the ball will pass through one slit, according to a common-sense prediction. However, when small particles, such as photons or electrons, are projected through two closely spaced apertures, the result is as if the particles simultaneously pass through the two apertures. In quantum physics, this unintuitive observation is explained by the wave-particle duality. It means that, physical entities can possess wavelike as well as particle-like characteristics. The duality is analogous to the two sides of a coin; the same reality can be described from different perspectives. Unfortunately, this knowledge does not cause that quantum mechanisms are entirely understandable and intuitional. Therefore, the following question remains open, how can we define quantum art when we are unable to fully grasp quantum mechanics? On a similar note, art itself is challenging to understand, albeit for different reasons. It is widely accepted that art is, to a significant extent, a subjective experience. An artist creates a piece of art that evokes diverse emotions and interpretations when presented to different people. Consequently, how can we bridge the gap between quantum mechanics, which is primarily comprehended through mathematics, and art, which is intuitively understood without the need for conscious reasoning? In other words, how can quantum art make the enigmatic world of quantum more intuitive and accessible?To address these questions, we created a challenge for the HackYeah! hackathon, one of the most prominent stationary events in Europe. We invited people to find an artistic way to illustrate the principles of quantum mechanics, including quantum superposition, entanglement, and decoherence. Approximately 700 individuals attended the event. Multiple challenges were submitted by different companies, and the Quantum Art challenge was chosen by 15 teams that ranged in size from two to seven people. After a short description of the challenge in Section 2, we explore some of these contributions in Section 3. Lastly, Section 4 concludes the paper. In our opinion, the artwork presented, especially the visual ones, helped to makes quantum principles more understandable, intuitive.The purpose of the challenge was to find an artistic way to illustrate quantum mechanics, specifically quantum superposition, entanglement, and decoherence.Quantum superposition refers to a phenomenon where a single particle can exist in two states simultaneously. In contrast to a 'normal' bit, which can be either 0 or 1, a quantum bit is a superposition of both 0 and 1.The measurement operation is the process through which a quantum state is collapsed to either the state 0 or 1. Let us consider two quantum bits; the possible measurement outcomes can be one of the following four combinations: 00, 01, 10, or 11. When only two of these combinations are possible, such as 00 and 11 or 10 and 01, one can state that the quantum bits are entangled because the state of one qubit affects the state of the second qubit and vice-versa.Decoherence of the quantum state is an effect that results from microscopic interactions between the quantum bits and the environment. This environmental noise impacts the state of the quantum bits and can lead to errors in computation. In other words, multiple measurements of the same quantum computation may yield different results. Different quantum computer architectures exhibit varying levels of noise.Here, the following question arises: How can people represent the principles of quantum mechanics in a way that it is tangible, visible, or even audible?In this section, we present a selected panel of examples that were implemented during the HackYeah! hackathon.This project effectively demonstrates the concept of quantum decoherence. It showcases a mosaic in which the arrangement of image elements is determined by the outcomes of quantum measurements (Figure 1). Various mosaics are generated following these measurements and are subsequently combined into an animated GIF. Notably, the greater the instability of the quantum computer, the more pronounced the glitches become within the mosaic. As a testament to its excellence, this project emerged as the winner of the challenge. The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/lukilesny/quantmosaic.This code is based on the previous quantum art of Wiktor Mazin, 1 which exploits the Julia fractal set for image generation. Julia fractals are fractals based on a recursive suite of a complex number.The code performs a straightforward computation that involves the measurement of two qubits. The probabilities of these qubits being in either state 0 or 1 are employed to initialise the real and imaginary part of the complex numbers in the Julia set. The resulting Julia fractal is presented as an image, which is then further customised through user input. This customised image is subsequently passed to the text-to-image artificial intelligence model Stable Diffusion to create both personalised and quantum artwork. This project also illustrates the concept of quantum decoherence. The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/Havystar/QUANTIUM.This work is also inspired by the contributions of Wiktor Mazin; however, it diverges by focusing on the creation of music rather than images. It resonates with the European project on Quantum Music2 (e.g., (1)), with the distinction being that instead of encoding notes into quantum states, it employs fractals to generate eight distinct musical notes.The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/kmazrolina/Quanterpoint.This project is also an application of quantum music. It breaks down musical compositions into 4/4 tempo measures. Each measure is encoded using a set of four qubit quantum circuits, with each quantum bit symbolising a distinct musical element, encompassing notes, rhythm, and pauses. Diverse variations of a melody are generated, each of which is closely tied to a specific quantum architecture. It is akin to experiencing music through a quantum lens that unveils the distinctive quantum voice of each architecture.The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/git-stashic/quantum-art.This project serves as an in-depth exploration of variational quantum circuits (VQCs) applied to the classification of the IRIS dataset. The classification results are then presented through Seaborn graphs (a library for scientific visualisation). This project is classified as scientific visualisation rather than art, but the effort merits our attention. A similar approach with VQCs can be observed in the pyRiemann-qiskit library (2), as showcased in the library documentation. 3 In this example, the learning parameters of the VQC are ingeniously illustrated as a spiral, with each branch signifying the variation in weight of a specific parameter.Additionally, the project delves into Bubble Art, drawing inspiration from the work of Radha Pyari Sandhir. 4 The core concept involves encoding a string into qubits and subsequently measuring the outcomes of computations performed on them. The resulting measurements are then transformed into bubbles. The size and number of bubbles convey information, with smaller, numerous bubbles indicating more noise, while larger bubbles represent measurements that yield the same results.The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/dr3du4/Quantium.Autoencoders are a class of neural networks that are commonly employed to extract an efficient representation of specific data, akin to dimension reduction techniques. In this particular scenario, the team proposed the use of a variational autoencoder, with its parameters initialised with the measurement of a quantum circuit. The autoencoder's purpose is to learn a concise representation of a cat by using the Kaggle CAT dataset. Dimensionality reduction essentially serves as a means of compressing the data, resulting in a deliberately artistic blurring or fuzziness effect on the original image.The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/polish-mountain/quantum-vae.Here, the concept revolves around the initialisation of a quantum circuit with brain wave frequencies, such as alpha and beta waves. Quantum operations are run on these states, and the outputs are measured in classical bits. Then, the resulting measurements are translated into values of saturation and luminance, ultimately contributing to the customisation of a piece of artwork.Essentially, it can be described as an electroencephalography (EEG) state personalised through quantum randomness. What makes this idea particularly intriguing is its potential for expansion. By introducing different qubits that represent the mental states of other users, brain synchronisation could be further represented by entangled states. When two users are competing or cooperating to solve a task, the synchronization between their mental states only allow for certain measurement probabilities, which is akin to a form of entanglement. This notion also resonates with the concept of the quantum brain hypothesis (3), according to which the brain coexists in multiple states simultaneously, which subsequently collapse. In this idea, EEG measurements become a measurement of these quantum brain states, and the task executed by the user while recording the electroencephalogram could be further represented by specific quantum operations. Just to be clear, we do not pretend that this is actually the case, but this project could lead to interesting metaphors between brain states and quantum representation.The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/kinga-marszalkowska/QuantumBrainArt.Various artistic viewpoints were submitted as part of the Quantum Art challenge at the HackYeah! hackathon, including images, animations, and music. By far, quantum decoherence -that is, quantum noise -was the most exploited quantum concept. While quantum superposition was used internally, it was not -in our opinion -sufficiently highlighted by the presented artworks. As for quantum entanglement, it was explored under the concept of quantum music. Apparently, it is not always intuitive for people to understand quantum entanglement simply by hearing music. Saying that, you need a certain level of knowledge to build appreciation. For example, children need to learn different tastes to appreciate food. Among the aforementioned works, we noticed the use of quantum principles for creating artistic visualisations of mental states through EEG, as well as the use of art to enhance the visualisation of machine learning techniques. Here, we see art's potential to enhance the comprehensibility and natural intuition of quantum phenomena. This is an interesting approach to make quantum more accessible, intuitive, especially for neophytes.The question that lingers is whether visualisation truly qualifies as art. The answer is nuanced and may rely on the intent itself. A good visualisation can be a piece of art if the machine learning model was created with the sole purpose of producing art rather than for merely explaining a machine learning algorithm.Another perspective is that of Japanese contemporary artist Matsuzawa Yutaka (1922-2006), although we admit that we have not had the opportunity to read the original Japanese text. Our understanding is based on the writings of Alan Longino from the Department of Art at the University of Chicago (4):"Trough Quantum Art, Matsuzawa invited future readers, viewers, and participants to conceive of a world where objects, bodies, images, and matter become less defined, more permeable, and bound together in limitless intimacy".In essence, the artist's manifesto is a call for renewal, a break from artistic conventions, similar to the role of quantum physics in the physical sciences.
The quantum eraser effect of Scully and Drühl dramatically underscores the difference between our classical conceptions of time and how quantum processes can unfold in time. Such eyebrow-raising features of time in quantum mechanics have been labeled "the fallacy of delayed choice and quantum eraser" on the one hand and described "as one of the most intriguing effects in quantum mechanics" on the other. In the present paper, we discuss how the availability or erasure of information generated in the past can affect how we interpret data in the present. The quantum eraser concept has been studied and extended in many different experiments and scenarios, for example, the entanglement quantum eraser, the kaon quantum eraser, and the use of quantum eraser entanglement to improve microscopic resolution.
Delayed-choice quantum eraser (DCQE) experiments are often presented as challenging classical causal intuitions by correlating detection events with choices implemented at later times. While it is well understood that post-selection plays a crucial role in producing the observed interference patterns, the structural features underlying such correlations are rarely analyzed within a unified framework. In this work, we introduce a simple probabilistic constraint applicable to idealized DCQE architectures. We show that four intuitive properties -- statistical independence of the choice, absence of losses, deterministic routing conditioned on the choice, and distinct conditional detection distributions -- cannot be simultaneously satisfied. This incompatibility provides a transparent classification of DCQE schemes and clarifies how conditional interference patterns arise without invoking exotic mechanisms.