Despite the unconditionally secure theory of quantum key distribution (QKD), several attacks have been successfully implemented against commercial QKD systems. Those systems have exhibited some flaws, as the secret key rate of corresponding protocols remains unaltered, while the eavesdropper obtains the entire secret key. We propose a new theoretical approach called quantum flows to be able to detect the eavesdropping activity in the channel without requiring additional optical components different from the BB84 protocol because the system can be implemented as a high software module. In this approach, the transmitter interleaves pairs of quantum states, referred to here as parallel and orthogonal (non-orthogonal) states, while the receiver uses active basis selection.
Despite the unconditionally secure theory of quantum key distribution (QKD), several attacks have been successfully implemented against commercial QKD systems. Those systems have exhibited some flaws, as the secret key rate of corresponding protocols remains unaltered, while the eavesdropper obtains the entire secret key. We propose a new theoretical approach called quantum flows to be able to detect the eavesdropping activity in the channel without requiring additional optical components different from the BB84 protocol because the system can be implemented as a high software module. In this approach, the transmitter interleaves pairs of quantum states, referred to here as parallel and orthogonal (non-orthogonal) states, while the receiver uses active basis selection.
Despite the unconditionally secure theory of the Quantum Key Distribution (Q K D), several attacks have been successfully implemented against commercial Q K D systems. Those systems have exhibited some flaws, as the secret key rate of corresponding protocols remains unaltered, while the eavesdropper obtains the entire secret key. We propose the negative acknowledgment state quantum key distribution protocol as a novel protocol capable of detecting the eavesdropping activity of the Intercept Resend with Faked Sates (I R F S) attack without requiring additional optical components different from the B B 84 protocol because the system can be implemented as a high software module. In this approach, the transmitter interleaves pairs of quantum states, referred to here as parallel and orthogonal states, while the receiver uses active basis selection.
Quantum key distribution (QKD) is intended to produce cryptographic secret keys between two remote parties, usually called Alice and Bob. Even though QKD has been proven to be unconditionally secure against the eavesdropper, commonly called Eve, practical implementations of QKD may contain vulnerabilities that may lead to the generated secret keys being compromised. In order to detect the presence of the eavesdropper in the channel, in our proposal Alice introduces an interleaved sequence of decoy states which produce a characteristic distribution at Bob's station. Thus, in analyzing such distribution in presence and absence of the eavesdropper Eve, her activity in the channel is detected. This protocol doesn’t require changes at the quantum physical level, but it can be incorporated at the high software level.
Quantum cryptography is a well-stated field within quantum applications where quantum information is used to set secure communications, authentication, and secret keys. Now used in quantum devices with those purposes, particularly Quantum Key Distribution (QKD), which proposes a secret key between two parties free of effective eavesdropping, at least at a higher level than classical cryptography. The best-known quantum protocol to securely share a secret key is the BB84 one. Other protocols have been proposed as adaptations of it. Most of them are based on the quantum indeterminacy for non-orthogonal quantum states. Their security is commonly based on the large length of the key. In the current work, a BB84-like procedure for QKD based on double quantum teleportation allows the sharing of the key statement using several parties. Thus, the quantum bits of information are assembled among three parties via entanglement, instead of travelling through a unique quantum channel as in the traditional protocol. Asymmetry in the double teleportation plus post-measurement retains the secrecy in the process. Despite requiring more complex control and resources, the procedure dramatically reduces the probability of success for an eavesdropper under individual attacks, because of the ignorance of the processing times in the procedure. Quantum Bit Error Rate remains in the acceptable threshold and it becomes configurable. The article depicts the double quantum teleportation procedure, the associated control to introduce the QKD scheme, the analysis of individual attacks performed by an eavesdropper, and a brief comparison with other protocols.
One promising way to use quantum information to secure everyday communication is through the distribution of quantum keys. By exchanging a secret key, the Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) approach allows two parties to communicate securely.BB84 protocol is among the most well-known QKD protocols. In this protocol, qubits are exchanged via a quantum channel between the sender and the receiver. This enables them to produce a shared key that is impenetrable to eavesdroppers and illustrate the fundamental ideas of QKD using current simulations and implementations. The results of this study demonstrate that the BB84 protocol is a highly secure QKD technique that has been investigated in great detail and used in a variety of contexts. Additionally, over the enhancements made to the BB84 protocol such as the use of advanced error correction techniques and decoy states to increase its security and usability is discussed. With an emphasis on the BB84 protocol in secure communication technologies, this study offers an extensive analysis of QKD systems overall.
Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) is an innovative technology which exploits the laws of quantum physics to generate and distribute shared secret key for use in cryptographic devices. Quantum Key Distribution offers the advantage of ‘unconditionally secure’ key generation with the unique ability to detect eavesdropping on the key distribution channel and shows promise for high-security applications such as those found in banking, government, and military environments. However, Quantum Key Distribution is a nascent technology where realized systems suffer from implementation non-idealities, which may significantly impact system performance and security. In this article, we discuss the modeling of a decoy state enabled Quantum Key Distribution system built to study the impact of these practical limitations. Specifically, we present a thorough background on the decoy state protocol, detailed discussion of the modeled decoy state enabled Quantum Key Distribution system, and evidence for component and sub-system verification, as well as, multiple examples of system-level validation. Additionally, we bring attention to practical considerations associated with implementing the decoy state protocol security condition gained from these research activities.
The rules of quantum mechanics makes it possible to exchange a secret key at a distance. This is called quantum key distribution (QKD). In theory the key exchange can be made completely secure. Real QKD implementations however, has numerous imperfections. Luckily one has also been able to prove the security of QKD with a large variety of imperfections. The field of QKD has matured over the recent years, and it has now reached commercial applications with photons as the quantum bits, and optical fibers as the quantum channel. Today there are at least three commercial vendors of QKD-systems. We live in the times of quantum hacking. Researchers has begun the task of breaking the security of QKD-systems. Many new imperfections has been discovered, some of which might be used to break the security of QKD. This thesis is a study of the detector efficiency mismatch loophole. Most QKD-systems require two detectors, and it is virtually impossible to make two identical detectors with the exact same efficiency. What is worse, it turns out that the eavesdropper can often control the relative efficiencies of the two detectors trough some domain, for instance by controlling the timing, the frequency or the spacial mode of the photons. This can in turn be used by the eavesdropper to gain information about the secret key. Previously the best known attack would compromise security if the detector efficiency mismatch of about 1:15. Here the current attacks on systems with detector efficiency mismatch are improved to compromise security for a mismatch of about 1:4. This is less than the mismatch found in a commercial QKD-system, so the attack could in principle be used to eavesdrop on this QKD-system. One might try to close the loophole by modifying the implementation. One suggestion is the four state Bob. The problem is that this patch will in turn open other loopholes, and one of these loopholes reopen the detector efficiency mismatch loophole. One can remove Eves information about the key by doing a sufficient amount of extra privacy amplification. Here a general security bound is presented, quantifying the required amount of extra privacy amplification to remove Eve's information about the key. The proof is more general than the previous security proof, and is valid for any basis dependent, possibly lossy, linear optical imperfections in the channel and receiver/detectors. Since this is more realistic assumptions for a QKD-implementation, the proof represents a major step of closing the loophole in real devices.