Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

A Note on the Possibility of Icomplete Theory

Han J.F. Geurdes, Koji Nagata, Tadao Nakamura, Ahmed Farouk

Published Feb 1, 2018• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

In the paper it is demonstrated that Bells theorem is an unprovable theorem. This inconsistency is similar to concrete mathematical incompleteness. The inconsistency is purely mathematical. Nevertheless the basic physics requirements of a local model are fulfilled.

Related papers

A note on the possibility of incomplete theory.

Han J.F. Geurdes

In the paper it is demonstrated that a concrete inconsistency occurs in experimental conclusions concerning quantum foundation. This inconsistency is similar to concrete mathematical incompleteness. We would like to stress that in the derivations there are no physics assumptions. Nevertheless the basic physics requirements of a local model are fulfilled.

•Dec 3, 2017•0 citations

A note on the possibility of incomplete theory.

Han J.F. Geurdes

In the paper it is demonstrated that a concrete inconsistency occurs in experimental conclusions concerning quantum foundation. This inconsistency is similar to concrete mathematical incompleteness. We would like to stress that in the derivations there are no physics assumptions. Nevertheless the basic physics requirements of a local model are fulfilled.

•Dec 3, 2017•13 citations

A Third Note on Bell's Theorem

Han J.F. Geurdes

In the paper it is demonstrated that Bell's formula for {+1,-1} measurement functions is inconsistent.

•Oct 1, 2018•0 citations

The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox and the Bell theorem

Ujjwal Sen

We will discuss here the Bell theorem, which shows that "locality" and "reality" are together inconsistent with quantum theory.

arXiv:2408.07639•Aug 14, 2024•0 citations

Open Letter To Professor Fabio Sciarrino, PhD

Ilija Barukčić

Bell's theorem is mathematically and logically inconsistent, just a logical fallacy. A serious experiment cannot confirm the logical consistency of somehting which is logically inconsistent.

•May 1, 2017•0 citations

The CHSH Bell Inequality: A Critical Look at Its Mathematics and Some Consequences for Physical Chemistry

Han J.F. Geurdes, Koji Nagata, Tadao Nakamura

Abstract In the paper it is demonstrated that Bell’s theorem is an unprovable theorem. The unprovable characteristic has, on the chemical side, repercussions for e.g. spin chemistry and the related magneto-reception studies. We claim that the unprovability of this basic mathematics cannot be ignored by the physics and chemical research community. The demonstrated mathematical multivaluedness could be an overlooked aspect of nature.

arXiv:1704.00005•Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry B•Aug 1, 2021•4 citations