aqora

Big Shock. Bell's Theorem Collapses Again.

Ilija Barukčić

Both from the points of view of recognition and understanding, the knowledge of fallacies can arm us against many kinds of mistakes and can help us to overcome serious scientific disagreements in a reasonable way. Being able to avoid or to detect fallacies can been viewed as a supplement to criteria of good scientific reasoning. Fallacies can be identified in several different ways. One way is to derive a logical contradiction such as +0 = +1. Still, a unified theory of fallacies giving us a systematic framework for demarcating fallacies and other kinds of mistakes is to be achieved. The present inquiry focuses on the logical and mathematical content of Bell's theorem. As we shall see, Bell's theorem itself is a false but popular belief, a deceptively bad argument. Bell's theorem is the most profound logical fallacy of physics and of science as such.Both from the points of view of recognition and understanding, the knowledge of fallacies can arm us against many kinds of mistakes and can help us to overcome serious scientific disagreements in a reasonable way. Being able to avoid or to detect fallacies can been viewed as a supplement to criteria of good scientific reasoning. Fallacies can be identified in several different ways. One way is to derive a logical contradiction such as +0 = +1. Still, a unified theory of fallacies giving us a systematic framework for demarcating fallacies and other kinds of mistakes is to be achieved. The present inquiry focuses on the logical and mathematical content of Bell's theorem. As we shall see, Bell's theorem itself is a false but popular belief, a deceptively bad argument. Bell's theorem is the most profound logical fallacy of physics and of science as such.

Apr 13, 20160 citations

Bell’s Theorem Refuted Mathematically for Professor X.

Gordon Watson

Bringing an elementary knowledge of sums and averages to Bell (1964), we refute Bell’s theorem.

Dec 1, 20170 citations

Bell’s Theorem Refuted: Based on Harry’s Analysis at Sciphysicsforums.com

Gordon Watson

Generalizing Bell 1964:(15) to realizable experiments, CHSH (1969) coined the term ‘Bell’s theorem’. Using undergraduate maths and logic, we show that Bell’s theorem and its CHSH-style variants are false (as discussed with David Mermin 1989.06.03).

May 1, 20140 citations

A Note on Bell’s Theorem Logical Consistency

Justo Pastor Lambare, Rodney Franco

arXiv:2012.10238Foundations of PhysicsJul 31, 202124 citations

The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox and the Bell theorem

Ujjwal Sen

We will discuss here the Bell theorem, which shows that "locality" and "reality" are together inconsistent with quantum theory.

arXiv:2408.07639Aug 14, 20240 citations

A Third Note on Bell's Theorem

Han J.F. Geurdes

In the paper it is demonstrated that Bell's formula for {+1,-1} measurement functions is inconsistent.

Oct 1, 20180 citations