Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

On the Hubbard model with large coupling

Alain Messager, Сергей Анатольевич Пирогов, Yuri Suhov

Published Jan 1, 1992• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

One-dimensional large-U Hubbard model in strong coupling

Zheng-Yu Weng, D. N. Sheng, C. S. Ting

International Journal of Modern Physics B•Jan 1, 1991•0 citations

One-dimensional Large-U Hubbard Model in Strong Coupling: Charge and Spin Separation

Zheng-Yu Weng, D. N. Sheng, C. S. Ting

A path-integral formalism of the Hubbard model is used to study the one-dimensional large-U case. It is shown that the bare electron (hole) becomes a composite particle of two decoupled excitations, holon and spinon, together with the non-local string fields. Various correlation functions are analytically derived. The results strongly suggest a U*=∞ fixed point of Hubbard model which is distinct from the weak coupling case.

International Journal of Modern Physics B•Jun 1, 1991•0 citations

The Strong Coupling Limit of the Hubbard Model

Li Liu, Hong Yao, Steven Allan Kivelson

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 17, 2010•0 citations

The Extended Hubbard Model at Large Interaction

P. G. J. van Dongen

NATO ASI series. Series B : Physics•Jan 1, 1995•1 citation

Estimation of biquadratic and bicubic Heisenberg effective couplings from multiorbital Hubbard models

Rahul Soni, Nitin Kaushal, Cengiz Şen +3 more

Abstract We studied a multi-orbital Hubbard model at half-filling for two and three orbitals per site on a two-site cluster via full exact diagonalization, in a wide range for the onsite repulsion U, from weak to strong coupling, and multiple ratios of the Hund coupling J H to U. The hopping matrix elements among the orbitals were also varied extensively. At intermediate and large U, we mapped the results into a Heisenberg model. For two orbitals per site, the mapping is into a S = 1 Heisenberg model where by symmetry both nearest-neighbor (S i ⋅ S j ) and ( S i ⋅ S j ) 2 are allowed, with respective couplings J 1 and J 2. For the case of three orbitals per site, the mapping is into a S = 3/2 Heisenberg model with (S i ⋅ S j ), ( S i ⋅ S j ) 2 , and ( S i ⋅ S j ) 3 terms, and respective couplings J 1, J 2, and J 3. The strength of these coupling constants in the Heisenberg models depend on the U, J H, and hopping amplitudes of the underlying Hubbard model. Our study provides a first crude estimate to establish bounds on how large the ratios J 2/J 1 and J 3/J 1 can be. We show that those ratios appear rather limited and, as a qualitative guidance, we conclude that J 2/J 1 is less than 0.4 and J 3/J 1 is less than 0.2, establishing bounds on effective models for strongly correlated Hubbard systems. Moreover, the intermediate Hubbard U regime was found to be the most promising to enhance J 2/J 1 and J 3/J 1.

arXiv:2112.11346•New Journal of Physics•Jun 23, 2022•16 citations

Magnetic couplings in the hubbard model

Eleftherios N. Economou, P. M. Mihas

Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials•Jan 1, 1978•0 citations
Abstract We studied a multi-orbital Hubbard model at half-filling for two and three orbitals per site on a two-site cluster via full exact diagonalization, in a wide range for the onsite repulsion U, from weak to strong coupling, and multiple ratios of the Hund coupling J H to U. The hopping matrix elements among the orbitals were also varied extensively. At intermediate and large U, we mapped the results into a Heisenberg model. For two orbitals per site, the mapping is into a S = 1 Heisenberg model where by symmetry both nearest-neighbor (S i ⋅ S j ) and ( S i ⋅ S j ) 2 are allowed, with respective couplings J 1 and J 2. For the case of three orbitals per site, the mapping is into a S = 3/2 Heisenberg model with (S i ⋅ S j ), ( S i ⋅ S j ) 2 , and ( S i ⋅ S j ) 3 terms, and respective couplings J 1, J 2, and J 3. The strength of these coupling constants in the Heisenberg models depend on the U, J H, and hopping amplitudes of the underlying Hubbard model. Our study provides a first crude estimate to establish bounds on how large the ratios J 2/J 1 and J 3/J 1 can be. We show that those ratios appear rather limited and, as a qualitative guidance, we conclude that J 2/J 1 is less than 0.4 and J 3/J 1 is less than 0.2, establishing bounds on effective models for strongly correlated Hubbard systems. Moreover, the intermediate Hubbard U regime was found to be the most promising to enhance J 2/J 1 and J 3/J 1.