Measurement of Stark Amplitudes in the 6 2P1/2 ---> 7 2P1/2 Transition of Atomic Thallium

C. J. Bowers, Dmitry Budker, Eugene D. Commins +4 more

K. Leung

Colin Bruzewicz

Nikolay I. Agladze, Aleksandr A. Balashov, V. D. Vedenin +1 more

David P. DeMille, Dmitry Budker, Eugene D. Commins

A measurement of the Stark-induced amplitudes \ensuremath{\alpha} and \ensuremath{\beta} for the 6${\mathit{P}}_{1/2}$\ensuremath{\rightarrow}7${\mathit{P}}_{1/2}$ transition in atomic thallium is reported. Absorption of cw laser light tuned to this transition at 293 nm was compared to absorption of 378-nm cw laser light tuned to the allowed 6${\mathit{P}}_{1/2}$\ensuremath{\rightarrow}7${\mathit{S}}_{1/2}$ transition. The absorption sample was an intense atomic beam in the presence of a strong electric field. The measured values are \ensuremath{\alpha}=2.01(4)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}5}$ ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{\mathit{B}}$/ (V/cm) and \ensuremath{\beta}=1.67(4)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}5}$${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{\mathit{B}}$/ (V/cm), where ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{\mathit{B}}$ is the Bohr magneton. These results are in agreement with semiempirical theory, but disagree with previous measurements of these amplitudes in this laboratory. A critical analysis of the previous measurement is given to explain the discrepancy. The newly measured value of \ensuremath{\beta} makes it necessary to reinterpret previous measurements of parity nonconservation in the 6${\mathit{P}}_{1/2}$\ensuremath{\rightarrow}7${\mathit{P}}_{1/2}$ transition. In the course of the present experiment, Stark shifts of the 6${\mathit{P}}_{1/2}$\ensuremath{\rightarrow}7${\mathit{P}}_{1/2}$ and 6${\mathit{P}}_{1/2}$\ensuremath{\rightarrow}7${\mathit{S}}_{1/2}$ transitions were also measured: \ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\nu}(6${\mathit{P}}_{1/2}$\ensuremath{\rightarrow}7${\mathit{S}}_{1/2}$)=-112(6) kHz/(kV/cm${)}^{2}$ and \ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\nu}(6${\mathit{P}}_{1/2}$\ensuremath{\rightarrow}7${\mathit{P}}_{1/2}$)=-618(31) kHz/(kV/cm${)}^{2}$. These results are also in good agrement with semiempirical theory.

George Toh, Dionysis Antypas, Daniel S. Elliott