The equation of motion for a particle moving in complex space is obtained and then solved. The interaction between the real and imaginary components of motion can produce what can be regarded as a wave motion in real space. The formation of interference patterns and polarization of a matter wave can be accounted for by the particle’s motion in complex space. The deterministic particle view of a free particle can then be reconciled with its dual probabilistic wave picture but the formulation is entirely in complex space.
The equation of motion for a particle moving in complex space is obtained and then solved. The interaction between the real and imaginary components of motion can produce what can be regarded as a wave motion in real space. The formation of interference patterns and polarization of a matter wave can be accounted for by the particle’s motion in complex space. The deterministic particle view of a free particle can then be reconciled with its dual probabilistic wave picture but the formulation is entirely in complex space.
In the particle-wave duality interpretation of matter and radiation (Topic G3) a particle moving in space can also be described as a wave in space with a wavelength related to the particle momentum by de Broglie’s equation, λ=h/p. In quantum mechanics, the notion of a particle moving in defined trajectories in a system is replaced entirely by this description of the system in terms of its wavefunctions, ψ. The wavefunction simultaneously describes all regions of space in which the particle it represents can be found. This, in turn, introduces the idea of uncertainty into quantum mechanics because the exact position of the particle at each point in time is not defined, only the region of space of all its possible positions. The exact shape of the wavefunction is important because the probability of finding the particle at each point is proportional to ψ2 at that point; a greater amplitude in the wavefunction corresponds to a greater probability density in the particle’s distribution.
Abstract Interference of more and more massive objects provides a spectacular confirmation of quantum theory. It is usually regarded as support for “wave–particle duality” and in an extension of this duality even as support for “complementarity”. We first give an outline of the historical development of these notions. Already here it becomes evident that they are hard to define rigorously, i.e. have mainly a heuristic function. Then we discuss recent interference experiments of large and complex molecules which seem to support this heuristic function of “duality”. However, we show that in these experiments the diffraction of a delocalized center-of-mass wave function depends on the interaction of the localized structure of the molecule with the diffraction element. Thus, the molecules display “dual features” at the same time, which contradicts the usual understanding of wave–particle duality. We conclude that the notion of “wave–particle duality” deserves no place in modern quantum physics.
The particle-interference-experiments, with the photons and electrons have clearly shown that they are always detected as localized ‘particles’; and the density of their detections exhibit a pattern similar to the interference of waves. This experimental-observation is alternatively interpreted here, different from the current, ‘probabilistic interpretation’. The ‘particle’ is first mathematically characterized as an ‘impulse function’ in space; and then Fourier-transformed into the wave-number-domain, as a wide band of constituent-waves as shown in the fig. 1&2. The ‘particle’ is an ‘event’ of constructive-superimposition of a wide band of ‘pre-quantum-waves’. This ‘event’ occurs in space at regular distances; and at regular instances in time. In the particle-interference-experiments, they are the wide band of ‘pre-quantum-waves which interfere physically. This physical interference of the pre-quantum-waves determines the position and time of emergence of the ‘impulse in space’ detectable as the ‘particle’. In the real-world-situation, the ‘pre-quantum-waves of a wide bandwidth arrive from all the directions, so the amplitude and phase of every constituent wave keep changing; so the place of constructive superimposition of all the spectral-components, keep varying unpredictably; and only the ‘probability’ of detection in a given volume is possible in practice. Thus, form the theoretical view-point, there are only the pre-quantum-waves; and ‘particle’ is a specific situation of constructive-superimposition of all the spectral-components of pre-quantum-waves; so there is no wave-particle-duality. The ‘probabilistic-interpretation’ is only a ‘practical-limitation’, detector being able to detect only the ‘particle’, and not the spectrum of constituent waves.
Abstract To enhance the consistency between the quantum descriptions of waves and particles, we quantise mechanical point particles in this paper in the same physically-motivated way as we previously quantised light in quantum electrodynamics (Bennett et al 2016 Eur. J. Phys. 37 014001). To identify the relevant Hilbert space, we notice that mechanical particles can occupy any position x while moving at any velocity v. Afterwards, we promote the classical states (x, v) to pairwise orthogonal quantum states | x , v ⟩ and demand that these evolve according to Newton’s equations of motion. The resulting quantum theory is mass-independent, when Newton’s equations of motion are mass-independent, as one would expect. The basic formulation of quantum mechanics emerges from quantum mechanics in configuration space as a semi-classical approximation when a fixed mass is imposed and several other adjustments are made.
Field-Theoretic Explanation of Wave-Particle Duality—Unification of Particle Locality and the Wave Nature of the Perturbation Field This paper provides a physical explanation of the most central puzzle in quantum mechanics—wave-particle duality—without relying on "probability-amplitude collapse" or "nonlocal entanglement." This theory divides all matter in the universe into Nie-matter entities (massive, Staticity) and Ji-matter entities (massless, Dynamicity), and maintains that quantum objects (electrons, neutrons, etc.) are always localized Nie-matter entity particles. Their "wave behavior" originates from the particle's local perturbation of the Ji-matter field that already fills space during motion—the perturbation propagates in the form of a wave, produces an interference field when passing through the double slits, and the interference field in turn guides the particle's landing position. The particle always passes through only one slit, while the field passes through both slits simultaneously; interference is the behavior of the field, not the behavior of the particle. This mechanism naturally explains double-slit interference, the coexistence of neutron collisions and wave behavior, the disturbance of interference fringes by observation devices, and the variation of interference contrast with source offset and slit spacing. This paper further gives three falsifiable predictions: P6-1 (a decisive distinction between device field-strength disturbance and which-path information disturbance), P6-2A (the disturbance effect varies continuously with field strength), and P6-2B (an argument for the explanatory power of double-slit interference contrast—naturally derived from one mechanism vs. jointly explained by four independent concepts). Compared with mainstream theory, this theory does not need "wavefunction collapse," does not need "nonlocality," and does not need "many worlds"—it only needs to acknowledge: particles are localized, the field fills space, and the motion of particles is guided by the local field gradient.
In quantum mechanics, the probabilistic interpretation, the complementarity principle (wave-particle duality), and the uncertainty principle form the foundation of the orthodox Copenhagen interpretation. However, this interpretation occasionally produces results that conflict with physical reasoning and intuition, leading to a long-standing debate that has persisted for nearly a century. Based on the conditions of action quantization and determinacy relations, this study reveals that the trajectory of an elementary particle forms a virtual line. At discrete points along this line, the particle exhibits particle-like properties, whereas in the regions between these points, the particle's existence cannot be detected. The most fundamental form of matter is the matter field. Its motion is wave-like and is described by a continuous wave equation and wave function over the entire spacetime domain. At specific spacetime points defined by xn =nh px and tn = nh E⁄ for n=1,2,3,…, the quantized matter field gives rise to the excitation and annihilation of elementary particles, indicating their discontinuous nature. This creation–annihilation process constitutes the wave motion of the matter field. The time and spatial scales associated with this process correspond to one period and one wavelength of the matter field wave, respectively. The Schrödinger equation, in this context, is understood as the non-relativistic equation of motion for a low-speed matter field. The eigenfunction of an elementary particle is, in essence, a wave function that describes the dynamic behavior of the matter field, encompassing the processes of its motion, as well as the generation and annihilation of the particle.