Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Adiabatic approximation for the evolution generated by an A-uniformly pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian

Wenhua Wang, Huaixin Cao, Zhengli Chen

Published Sep 1, 2017• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We discuss an adiabatic approximation for the evolution generated by an A-uniformly pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian H(t). Such a Hamiltonian is a time-dependent operator H(t) similar to a time-dependent Hermitian Hamiltonian G(t) under a time-independent invertible operator A. Using the relation between the solutions of the evolution equations H(t) and G(t), we prove that H(t) and H † (t) have the same real eigenvalues and the corresponding eigenvectors form two biorthogonal Riesz bases for the state space. For the adiabatic approximate solution in case of the minimum eigenvalue and the ground state of the operator H(t), we prove that this solution coincides with the system state at every instant if and only if the ground eigenvector is time-independent. We also find two upper bounds for the adiabatic approximation error in terms of the norm distance and in terms of the generalized fidelity. We illustrate the obtained results with several examples.

DOI
10.1134/s0040577917090070

Related papers

On the pseudo-Hermitian invariant method for the time-dependent Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians

Boubakeur Khantoul, Abdelhafid Bounames, Mustapha Maamache

We propose a scheme to deal with certain time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonian operators $H(t)$ that generate a real phase in their time-evolution. This involves the use of invariant operators $I_{PH}(t)$ that are pseudo-Hermitian with respect to the time-dependent metric operator and which implies that the dynamics is governed by unitary time evolution. Furthermore, $H(t)$ is not generally quasi-Hermitian and does not define an observable of the system but $I_{PH}(t)$ obeys a quasi-hermiticity transformation as in the completely time-independent Hamiltonian systems case. The harmonic oscillator with a time-dependent frequency under the action of a complex time-dependent linear potential is considered as an illustrative example.

•Oct 28, 2016•3 citations

Quantum adiabatic theorem with energy gap regularization

Nikolay Borisovich Ilin

The dynamics of a nonstationary quantum system whose Hamiltonian explicitly depends on time is called adiabatic if a system state that is an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian at the initial instant of time remains close to this eigenstate throughout the evolution. The degree of such closeness depends on the smallness of the parameter that determines the rate of change of the Hamiltonian. It is usually believed that one of the factors playing a decisive role for the stability of the adiabatic dynamics is the structure of the spectrum of the Hamiltonian. As the quantum adiabatic theorem states in its usual formulation, deviations from the adiabatic evolution can be estimated from above by the ratio of the rate of change of the Hamiltonian to the minimum distance between the energy of the state that approximates the adiabatic dynamics and the rest of the spectrum of the Hamiltonian. We analyze this dependence and prove theorems showing that the efficiency of the adiabatic approximation is more influenced by the rate of change of the Hamiltonian eigenvectors than by the dynamics of the spectrum. In a vast majority of physically meaningful cases, it turns out that controlling the dynamics of eigenvectors is sufficient for ensuring the adiabaticity, regardless of the dynamics of the spectrum as such.

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics•Apr 1, 2022•1 citation

Time evolution of quantum systems with time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonian and the pseudo Hermitian invariant operator

Mustapha Maamache, Oum Kaltoum Djeghiour, Walid Koussa +1 more

We study the time evolution of quantum systems with a time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonian given by a linear combination of SU(1,1) and SU(2) generators.With a time-dependent metric, the pseudo-Hermitian invariant operator is constructed in the same manner as for both the SU(1,1) and SU(2) systems. The exact common solutions of the Schrödinger equations for both the SU(1,1) and SU(2) systems are obtained in terms of eigenstates of the pseudo-Hermitian invariant operator.

arXiv:1705.08298•May 21, 2017•2 citations

Adiabatic theorem and generalized geometrical phase in the case of pseudo-Hermitian systems

S Cheniti, Walid Koussa, A Medjber +1 more

Abstract A generalization of the adiabatic theorem for quantum systems governed by pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonians and details of its demonstration are given. Introducing a modified time-dependent metric giving a precise description of the quantum unitary evolution where the obtained effective Hamiltonian is observable because it is mean value is real. We show that an eigenstate of a pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian slowly transported will acquire a real generalized geometrical phase factor which contains two contributions: the first one corresponds to the conventional Berry’s phase as expected and a new geometrical term that we call the metric geometrical phase. We will apply our results in the cases of the famous time dependent brachistochrone problem and a non-Hermitian displaced harmonic oscillator.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Aug 7, 2020•11 citations

Periodic pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian: Nonadiabatic geometric phase

Mustapha Maamache

It is well known that Hermitian operators have real eigenvalues while non-Hermitian ones may have complex eigenvalues. Recently, numerical and analytical results indicated that the spectra of many non-Hermitians Hamiltonians $H$ are indeed real if they are invariant under the combined action of self-adjoint parity $P$ and time reversal $T.$ The concept of a pseudo-Hermitian operator showed that the remarkable spectral properties of the $PT$-symmetric Hamiltonians follow from their pseudo-Hermiticity. It is possible to explain these observations by the concept of pseudo-Hermitian operators and to formulate completeness and orthonormality relations. Most of the effort has been devoted to study time-independent non-Hermitian systems. In this paper, we study the exactly solvable time-dependent periodic pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonians. The method introduced, to make the reality of eigenvalues and phases, is based on a Floquet decomposition of the evolution operator ${U}^{H}(t)={Z}^{H}(t)exp(i{M}^{H}t)$ associated with the periodic pseudo-hermitian Hamiltonian $H(t)=H(t+T)$. One of the results found in this paper concerns a calculation of Berry's phase for periodic, but not necessarily adiabatic, pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonians. A two-level pseudo-Hermitian system is discussed as an illustrative example.

Physical Review A•Sep 8, 2015•29 citations

Adiabatic Product Expansion

Alí Mostafazadeh

The time-evolution operator for an explicitly time-dependent Hamiltonian is expressed as the product of a sequence of unitary operators. These are obtained by successive time-dependent unitary transformations of the Hilbert space followed by the adiabatic approximation at each step. The resulting adiabatic product expansion yields a generalization of the quantum adiabatic approximation. Furthermore, it leads to an infinite class of exactly solvable models. PACS number: 03.65.Bz Consider the dynamics of a quantum mechanical system whose Hamiltonian H = H(τ) is explicitly time-dependent. The evolution of a state vector |ψ(τ) 〉 is governed by the Schrödinger equation: i¯h | ˙ ψ(τ) 〉 = H(τ) |ψ(τ) 〉 , |ψ(0) 〉 = |ψ0 〉 , (1) where a dot means a time-derivative. Alternatively, one has |ψ(τ) 〉 = U(τ)|ψ0〉, where i τ − H(t) dt U(τ) = T e ¯h 0 (2) is the time-evolution operator. Here T denotes the time-ordering operator. The purpose of this article is to express U(τ) as the product of a sequence of unitary operators each of

•Jan 1, 1996•4 citations
We discuss an adiabatic approximation for the evolution generated by an A-uniformly pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian H(t). Such a Hamiltonian is a time-dependent operator H(t) similar to a time-dependent Hermitian Hamiltonian G(t) under a time-independent invertible operator A. Using the relation between the solutions of the evolution equations H(t) and G(t), we prove that H(t) and H † (t) have the same real eigenvalues and the corresponding eigenvectors form two biorthogonal Riesz bases for the state space. For the adiabatic approximate solution in case of the minimum eigenvalue and the ground state of the operator H(t), we prove that this solution coincides with the system state at every instant if and only if the ground eigenvector is time-independent. We also find two upper bounds for the adiabatic approximation error in terms of the norm distance and in terms of the generalized fidelity. We illustrate the obtained results with several examples.
We propose a scheme to deal with certain time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonian operators H(t)H(t)H(t) that generate a real phase in their time-evolution. This involves the use of invariant operators IPH(t)I_{PH}(t)IPH​(t) that are pseudo-Hermitian with respect to the time-dependent metric operator and which implies that the dynamics is governed by unitary time evolution. Furthermore, H(t)H(t)H(t) is not generally quasi-Hermitian and does not define an observable of the system but IPH(t)I_{PH}(t)IPH​(t) obeys a quasi-hermiticity transformation as in the completely time-independent Hamiltonian systems case. The harmonic oscillator with a time-dependent frequency under the action of a complex time-dependent linear potential is considered as an illustrative example.
The dynamics of a nonstationary quantum system whose Hamiltonian explicitly depends on time is called adiabatic if a system state that is an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian at the initial instant of time remains close to this eigenstate throughout the evolution. The degree of such closeness depends on the smallness of the parameter that determines the rate of change of the Hamiltonian. It is usually believed that one of the factors playing a decisive role for the stability of the adiabatic dynamics is the structure of the spectrum of the Hamiltonian. As the quantum adiabatic theorem states in its usual formulation, deviations from the adiabatic evolution can be estimated from above by the ratio of the rate of change of the Hamiltonian to the minimum distance between the energy of the state that approximates the adiabatic dynamics and the rest of the spectrum of the Hamiltonian. We analyze this dependence and prove theorems showing that the efficiency of the adiabatic approximation is more influenced by the rate of change of the Hamiltonian eigenvectors than by the dynamics of the spectrum. In a vast majority of physically meaningful cases, it turns out that controlling the dynamics of eigenvectors is sufficient for ensuring the adiabaticity, regardless of the dynamics of the spectrum as such.
Abstract A generalization of the adiabatic theorem for quantum systems governed by pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonians and details of its demonstration are given. Introducing a modified time-dependent metric giving a precise description of the quantum unitary evolution where the obtained effective Hamiltonian is observable because it is mean value is real. We show that an eigenstate of a pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian slowly transported will acquire a real generalized geometrical phase factor which contains two contributions: the first one corresponds to the conventional Berry’s phase as expected and a new geometrical term that we call the metric geometrical phase. We will apply our results in the cases of the famous time dependent brachistochrone problem and a non-Hermitian displaced harmonic oscillator.
It is well known that Hermitian operators have real eigenvalues while non-Hermitian ones may have complex eigenvalues. Recently, numerical and analytical results indicated that the spectra of many non-Hermitians Hamiltonians HHH are indeed real if they are invariant under the combined action of self-adjoint parity PPP and time reversal T.T.T. The concept of a pseudo-Hermitian operator showed that the remarkable spectral properties of the PTPTPT-symmetric Hamiltonians follow from their pseudo-Hermiticity. It is possible to explain these observations by the concept of pseudo-Hermitian operators and to formulate completeness and orthonormality relations. Most of the effort has been devoted to study time-independent non-Hermitian systems. In this paper, we study the exactly solvable time-dependent periodic pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonians. The method introduced, to make the reality of eigenvalues and phases, is based on a Floquet decomposition of the evolution operator UH(t)=ZH(t)exp(iMHt){U}^{H}(t)={Z}^{H}(t)exp(i{M}^{H}t)UH(t)=ZH(t)exp(iMHt) associated with the periodic pseudo-hermitian Hamiltonian H(t)=H(t+T)H(t)=H(t+T)H(t)=H(t+T). One of the results found in this paper concerns a calculation of Berry's phase for periodic, but not necessarily adiabatic, pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonians. A two-level pseudo-Hermitian system is discussed as an illustrative example.
The time-evolution operator for an explicitly time-dependent Hamiltonian is expressed as the product of a sequence of unitary operators. These are obtained by successive time-dependent unitary transformations of the Hilbert space followed by the adiabatic approximation at each step. The resulting adiabatic product expansion yields a generalization of the quantum adiabatic approximation. Furthermore, it leads to an infinite class of exactly solvable models. PACS number: 03.65.Bz Consider the dynamics of a quantum mechanical system whose Hamiltonian H = H(τ) is explicitly time-dependent. The evolution of a state vector |ψ(τ) 〉 is governed by the Schrödinger equation: i¯h | ˙ ψ(τ) 〉 = H(τ) |ψ(τ) 〉 , |ψ(0) 〉 = |ψ0 〉 , (1) where a dot means a time-derivative. Alternatively, one has |ψ(τ) 〉 = U(τ)|ψ0〉, where i τ − H(t) dt U(τ) = T e ¯h 0 (2) is the time-evolution operator. Here T denotes the time-ordering operator. The purpose of this article is to express U(τ) as the product of a sequence of unitary operators each of