Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1705.08298

Time evolution of quantum systems with time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonian and the pseudo Hermitian invariant operator

Mustapha Maamache, Oum Kaltoum Djeghiour, Walid Koussa, Naima Mana

Published May 21, 2017• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We study the time evolution of quantum systems with a time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonian given by a linear combination of SU(1,1) and SU(2) generators.With a time-dependent metric, the pseudo-Hermitian invariant operator is constructed in the same manner as for both the SU(1,1) and SU(2) systems. The exact common solutions of the Schrödinger equations for both the SU(1,1) and SU(2) systems are obtained in terms of eigenstates of the pseudo-Hermitian invariant operator.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1705.08298

Related papers

The pseudo Hermitian invariant operator and time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonian exhibiting a SU(1,1) and SU(2) dynamical symmetry

Walid Koussa, Naima Mana, Oum Kaltoum Djeghiour +1 more

We study the time evolution of quantum systems with a time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonian exhibiting a SU(1,1) and SU(2) dynamical symmetry. With a time-dependent metric, the pseudo-Hermitian invariant operator is constructed in the same manner as for both the SU(1,1) and SU(2) systems. The exact common solutions of the Schrödinger equations for both the SU(1,1) and SU(2) systems are obtained in terms of eigenstates of the pseudo-Hermitian invariant operator. Finally some interesting physical applications are suggested and discussed.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jul 1, 2018•18 citations

Time evolution of quantum systems with time-dependent Hamiltonian and the invariant Hermitian operator

Y-Z Lai, J.-Q. Liang, Harald J W Müller-Kirsten +1 more

We study the time evolution of a class of exactly solvable time-dependent quantum systems with a time-dependent Hamiltonian given by a linear combination of SU(1,1) and SU(2) generators with the help of the invariant Hermitian operator. The exact common solutions of the Schrödinger equations for both the SU(1,1) and SU(2) systems are obtained in terms of eigenstates of the invariant operator. The adiabatic and non-adiabatic Berry phases are calculated with the exact solutions. Moreover, we derive an explicit time-evolution operator which is used to investigate the time-dependent two-photon squeezing states and SU(2) squeezing states. The squeezing properties of the time-dependent SU(1,1) coherent states are also discussed.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Apr 21, 1996•47 citations

Time-dependent quantum systems and the invariant Hermitian operator

Y. Lai, J.-Q. Liang, Harald J W Müller-Kirsten +1 more

We study the time evolution of quantum systems with a time-dependent Hamiltonian given by a linear combination of SU(1,1) and SU(2) generators. The invariant Hermitian operator is constructed in the same manner as for both the SU(1,1) and SU(2) systems. With the help of the invariant Hermitian operator we obtain not only the exact solutions of the Schr\"odinger equation but also the time-evolution operator. The adiabatic and nonadiabatic Berry phases are calculated with the exact solutions. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.

Physical Review A•May 1, 1996•93 citations

Non-Hermitian Hamiltonian beyond PT symmetry for time-dependent S U ( 1 , 1 ) and S U ( 2 ) systems — Exact solution and geometric phase in pseudo-invariant theory

Nadjat Amaouche, Maroua Sekhri, Rahma Zerimeche +2 more

In this paper we investigate time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, which consist of SU(1,1) and SU(2) generators. The former Hamiltonian is PT symmetric but the latter one is not. A time-dependent non-unitary operator is proposed to construct the non-Hermitian invariant, which is verified as pseudo-Hermitian with real eigenvalues. The exact solutions are obtained in terms of the eigenstates of the pseudo-Hermitian invariant operator for both the SU(1,1) and SU(2) systems in a unified manner. Then, we derive the Lewis–Riesenfeld (LR) phase, which can be separated into the dynamic and the geometrical phases. The analytical results are well consistent with those of the corresponding Hermitian Hamiltonians reported in the literature.

Physics Open•Nov 21, 2022•4 citations

TIME EVOLUTION OF A QUANTUM SYSTEM WITH HAMILTONIAN CONSISTING OF TIME-DEPENDENT LINEAR COMBINATION OF SU(l, 1)AND SU(2) GENERATORS AND THE HERMITIAN INVARIANT OPERATOR

LAI YUN-ZHONG, Liang Jiu-Qing, (1)山西大学物理系,太原030006; (2)太原重型机械学院基础部,太原030024

We study the time evolution of a quantum system with Hamiltonian consisting of time-dependent linear combination of SU(1,1) and SU(2) generators. A proper hermitian invariant operator has been found to obtain not only closed formulas for the time evolution of quantum states but also the time evolution operators for both the SU(1, 1) and SU(2) systems. The time evolution operators have been used to investigate the time-dependent two photons and SU(2) squeezing states and squeezing properties of the time-dependent SU(1,1) coherent states.

Acta Physica Sinica•Jan 1, 1996•3 citations

On the pseudo-Hermitian invariant method for the time-dependent Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians

Boubakeur Khantoul, Abdelhafid Bounames, Mustapha Maamache

We propose a scheme to deal with certain time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonian operators $H(t)$ that generate a real phase in their time-evolution. This involves the use of invariant operators $I_{PH}(t)$ that are pseudo-Hermitian with respect to the time-dependent metric operator and which implies that the dynamics is governed by unitary time evolution. Furthermore, $H(t)$ is not generally quasi-Hermitian and does not define an observable of the system but $I_{PH}(t)$ obeys a quasi-hermiticity transformation as in the completely time-independent Hamiltonian systems case. The harmonic oscillator with a time-dependent frequency under the action of a complex time-dependent linear potential is considered as an illustrative example.

•Oct 28, 2016•3 citations
We study the time evolution of quantum systems with a time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonian given by a linear combination of SU(1,1) and SU(2) generators.With a time-dependent metric, the pseudo-Hermitian invariant operator is constructed in the same manner as for both the SU(1,1) and SU(2) systems. The exact common solutions of the Schrödinger equations for both the SU(1,1) and SU(2) systems are obtained in terms of eigenstates of the pseudo-Hermitian invariant operator.
We study the time evolution of quantum systems with a time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonian exhibiting a SU(1,1) and SU(2) dynamical symmetry. With a time-dependent metric, the pseudo-Hermitian invariant operator is constructed in the same manner as for both the SU(1,1) and SU(2) systems. The exact common solutions of the Schrödinger equations for both the SU(1,1) and SU(2) systems are obtained in terms of eigenstates of the pseudo-Hermitian invariant operator. Finally some interesting physical applications are suggested and discussed.
We study the time evolution of a class of exactly solvable time-dependent quantum systems with a time-dependent Hamiltonian given by a linear combination of SU(1,1) and SU(2) generators with the help of the invariant Hermitian operator. The exact common solutions of the Schrödinger equations for both the SU(1,1) and SU(2) systems are obtained in terms of eigenstates of the invariant operator. The adiabatic and non-adiabatic Berry phases are calculated with the exact solutions. Moreover, we derive an explicit time-evolution operator which is used to investigate the time-dependent two-photon squeezing states and SU(2) squeezing states. The squeezing properties of the time-dependent SU(1,1) coherent states are also discussed.
We study the time evolution of quantum systems with a time-dependent Hamiltonian given by a linear combination of SU(1,1) and SU(2) generators. The invariant Hermitian operator is constructed in the same manner as for both the SU(1,1) and SU(2) systems. With the help of the invariant Hermitian operator we obtain not only the exact solutions of the Schr\"odinger equation but also the time-evolution operator. The adiabatic and nonadiabatic Berry phases are calculated with the exact solutions. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.
In this paper we investigate time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, which consist of SU(1,1) and SU(2) generators. The former Hamiltonian is PT symmetric but the latter one is not. A time-dependent non-unitary operator is proposed to construct the non-Hermitian invariant, which is verified as pseudo-Hermitian with real eigenvalues. The exact solutions are obtained in terms of the eigenstates of the pseudo-Hermitian invariant operator for both the SU(1,1) and SU(2) systems in a unified manner. Then, we derive the Lewis–Riesenfeld (LR) phase, which can be separated into the dynamic and the geometrical phases. The analytical results are well consistent with those of the corresponding Hermitian Hamiltonians reported in the literature.
We study the time evolution of a quantum system with Hamiltonian consisting of time-dependent linear combination of SU(1,1) and SU(2) generators. A proper hermitian invariant operator has been found to obtain not only closed formulas for the time evolution of quantum states but also the time evolution operators for both the SU(1, 1) and SU(2) systems. The time evolution operators have been used to investigate the time-dependent two photons and SU(2) squeezing states and squeezing properties of the time-dependent SU(1,1) coherent states.
We propose a scheme to deal with certain time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonian operators H(t)H(t)H(t) that generate a real phase in their time-evolution. This involves the use of invariant operators IPH(t)I_{PH}(t)IPH​(t) that are pseudo-Hermitian with respect to the time-dependent metric operator and which implies that the dynamics is governed by unitary time evolution. Furthermore, H(t)H(t)H(t) is not generally quasi-Hermitian and does not define an observable of the system but IPH(t)I_{PH}(t)IPH​(t) obeys a quasi-hermiticity transformation as in the completely time-independent Hamiltonian systems case. The harmonic oscillator with a time-dependent frequency under the action of a complex time-dependent linear potential is considered as an illustrative example.