Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Information Processing

Parameter optimization in biased decoy-state quantum key distribution with both source errors and statistical fluctuations

Jian-Rong Zhu, Jian Li, Chun-Mei Zhang, Qin Wang

Published Aug 17, 2017• 9 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s11128-017-1687-7

Related papers

Decoy-state quantum key distribution with both source errors and statistical fluctuations

Xiang‐Bin Wang, Lin Mei Yang, Cheng-Zhi Peng +1 more

We show how to calculate the fraction of single-photon counts of the 3-intensity decoy-state quantum cryptography faithfully with both statistical fluctuations and source errors.Our results rely only on the bound values of a few parameters of the states of pulses.

arXiv:0902.4660•New Journal of Physics•Jul 15, 2009•104 citations

Parameter optimization in decoy-state phase-matching quantum key distribution

Lu Wang, Qin Dong, Rongzhen Jiao

Quantum Information Processing•Oct 14, 2023•5 citations

Decoy-state quantum key distribution with practical light source

Rongzhen Jiao, Chao Zhang, Haiqiang Ma

The performance of active decoy-state quantum key distribution (QKD) system with a practical light source is compared with that of passive decoy-state QKD. The effect of statistical fluctuation due to a finite data size on final secret key rate is analyzed. This procedure is based on the standard error analysis on the assumption that all the variables measured in the experiment fluctuate around their asymptotic values. The relation between key generation rate and secure transmission distance is shown with exchanged quantum efficiency of threshold detector (d=1 and d=0.4) under the condition of active decoy-state (or passive decoy-state ) QKD which we pick the data size to be N=6.0109. This analysis will provide important parameters for practical QKD experiment.

Acta Physica Sinica•Jan 1, 2011•7 citations

Estimation of decoy state parameters for practical quantum key distribution

Sellami Ali

•Jan 1, 2010•1 citation

Theory for decoy-state quantum key distribution with large errors of light intensity

X. B. Wang

•Sep 11, 2006•0 citations

Reexamination of decoy-state quantum key distribution with biased bases

Zong‐Wen Yu, Yi-Heng Zhou, Xiang‐Bin Wang

In order to improve the key rate of the decoy-state method, we need to jointly study yields of different bases. Given the delicate fact that pulses of the same preparation state can have different counting rates if they are measured in different bases, for example, those vacuum pulses and those single-photon pulses, existing results of decoy-state quantum key distribution using biased bases are actually flawed by assuming that they are equal. We fix this flaw through using the idea that yields of pulses prepared in different bases are the same provided that they are prepared in the same state and also measured in the same basis, for example, those single-photon pulses prepared in different bases but measured in the same basis. Based on this, we present correct formulas for the decoy-state method using biased bases. Taking the effects of statistical fluctuations into account, we then numerically study the key rates of different protocols with all parameters being fully optimized. Our result confirms the prior conclusion that the decoy-state method using biased bases can have an advantage over the symmetric protocol with unbiased bases. We obtain high key rates of our four-intensity protocol without using any vacuum source.

arXiv:1509.04011•Physical Review A•Mar 7, 2016•29 citations
The performance of active decoy-state quantum key distribution (QKD) system with a practical light source is compared with that of passive decoy-state QKD. The effect of statistical fluctuation due to a finite data size on final secret key rate is analyzed. This procedure is based on the standard error analysis on the assumption that all the variables measured in the experiment fluctuate around their asymptotic values. The relation between key generation rate and secure transmission distance is shown with exchanged quantum efficiency of threshold detector (d=1 and d=0.4) under the condition of active decoy-state (or passive decoy-state ) QKD which we pick the data size to be N=6.0109. This analysis will provide important parameters for practical QKD experiment.
In order to improve the key rate of the decoy-state method, we need to jointly study yields of different bases. Given the delicate fact that pulses of the same preparation state can have different counting rates if they are measured in different bases, for example, those vacuum pulses and those single-photon pulses, existing results of decoy-state quantum key distribution using biased bases are actually flawed by assuming that they are equal. We fix this flaw through using the idea that yields of pulses prepared in different bases are the same provided that they are prepared in the same state and also measured in the same basis, for example, those single-photon pulses prepared in different bases but measured in the same basis. Based on this, we present correct formulas for the decoy-state method using biased bases. Taking the effects of statistical fluctuations into account, we then numerically study the key rates of different protocols with all parameters being fully optimized. Our result confirms the prior conclusion that the decoy-state method using biased bases can have an advantage over the symmetric protocol with unbiased bases. We obtain high key rates of our four-intensity protocol without using any vacuum source.