Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Theory for decoy-state quantum key distribution with large errors of light intensity

X. B. Wang

Published Sep 11, 2006• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Decoy State Quantum Key Distribution: Theory and Practice

Yi Zhao, Hoi‐Kwong Lo, Xiongfeng Ma +3 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 8, 2007•4 citations

General theory for decoy-state quantum key distribution with an arbitrary number of intensities

Masahito Hayashi

We develop a general theory for quantum key distribution (QKD) in both the forward error correction and the reverse error correction cases when the QKD system is equipped with phase-randomized coherent light with an arbitrary number of decoy intensities. For this purpose, generalizing Wang's expansion, we derive a convex expansion of the phase-randomized coherent state. We also numerically check that the asymptotic key generation rates are almost saturated when the number of decoy intensities is three.

arXiv:quant-ph/0702251•New Journal of Physics•Aug 24, 2007•52 citations

Analysis of three-intensity decoy-state phase-matching quantum key distribution

Ziang Song, Guoqi Huang, Qin Dong +1 more

The European Physical Journal D•Nov 1, 2021•2 citations

Decoy-state quantum key distribution with large random errors of light intensity

Xiang‐Bin Wang

We show how to do decoy-state quantum key distribution efficiently with large random errors in the intensity control. We present a theorem for efficiently calculating the lower bound of single-photon counts with many undetermined parameters. In the calculation of the single-photon counts of our protocol, the linear terms of the intensity fluctuation disappear and only the quadratic terms take effect. Given that the intensity fluctuation is upper bounded by $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}5%$, $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}10%$, and $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}15%$, the verified lower bound of the percentage of untagged bits from our protocol is as large as 99.7%, 99.0%, and 97.9% of that from an ideal protocol where the light intensity is exactly controlled.

arXiv:quant-ph/0609081•Physical Review A•May 2, 2007•72 citations

Sending-or-Not-Sending Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution with a Passive Decoy-State Method

Ke Xue, Zhigang Shen, Shengmei Zhao +1 more

Twin-field quantum key distribution (TF-QKD) has attracted considerable attention because it can exceed the basic rate-distance limit without quantum repeaters. Its variant protocol, sending or not-sending quantum key distribution (SNS-QKD), not only fixes the security vulnerability of TF-QKD, but also can tolerate large misalignment errors. However, the current SNS-QKD protocol is based on the active decoy-state method, which may lead to side channel information leakage when multiple light intensities are modulated in practice. In this work, we propose a passive decoy-state SNS-QKD protocol to further enhance the security of SNS-QKD. Numerical simulation results show that the protocol not only improves the security in source, but also retains the advantages of tolerating large misalignment errors. Therefore, it may provide further guidance for the practical application of SNS-QKD.

Entropy•May 8, 2022•3 citations

Practical decoy state quantum key distribution with detector efficiency mismatch

Yangyang Fei, Xiangdong Meng, Ming Yuan Gao +2 more

The European Physical Journal D•Jun 1, 2018•7 citations
We develop a general theory for quantum key distribution (QKD) in both the forward error correction and the reverse error correction cases when the QKD system is equipped with phase-randomized coherent light with an arbitrary number of decoy intensities. For this purpose, generalizing Wang's expansion, we derive a convex expansion of the phase-randomized coherent state. We also numerically check that the asymptotic key generation rates are almost saturated when the number of decoy intensities is three.
We show how to do decoy-state quantum key distribution efficiently with large random errors in the intensity control. We present a theorem for efficiently calculating the lower bound of single-photon counts with many undetermined parameters. In the calculation of the single-photon counts of our protocol, the linear terms of the intensity fluctuation disappear and only the quadratic terms take effect. Given that the intensity fluctuation is upper bounded by $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}5%$, $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}10%$, and $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}15%$, the verified lower bound of the percentage of untagged bits from our protocol is as large as 99.7%, 99.0%, and 97.9% of that from an ideal protocol where the light intensity is exactly controlled.
Twin-field quantum key distribution (TF-QKD) has attracted considerable attention because it can exceed the basic rate-distance limit without quantum repeaters. Its variant protocol, sending or not-sending quantum key distribution (SNS-QKD), not only fixes the security vulnerability of TF-QKD, but also can tolerate large misalignment errors. However, the current SNS-QKD protocol is based on the active decoy-state method, which may lead to side channel information leakage when multiple light intensities are modulated in practice. In this work, we propose a passive decoy-state SNS-QKD protocol to further enhance the security of SNS-QKD. Numerical simulation results show that the protocol not only improves the security in source, but also retains the advantages of tolerating large misalignment errors. Therefore, it may provide further guidance for the practical application of SNS-QKD.