Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Atomic Transition Probabilities

Wolfgang L. Wiese, Daniel E. Kelleher, Jeffrey R. Fuhr, L. I. Podobedova

Published Jan 1, 1991• 873 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Transition Probabilities and Atomic Lifetimes

Wolfgang L. Wiese

•Feb 1, 2001•0 citations

Advances in the Measurement of Atomic Transition Probabilities

Thomas R. O’Brian

•Jan 1, 1991•0 citations

Atomic transition probabilities of Er i

James E. Lawler, Jean-François Wyart, E. A. Den Hartog

Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics•Nov 12, 2010•16 citations

Transition probabilities for the Er atom.

V. A. Komarovskii, Yu. M. Smirnov

Optics and Spectroscopy•Aug 1, 1993•2 citations

Dominant magnetically induced transitions in alkali metal atoms with nuclear spin 3/2

Armen D. Sargsyan, A. Tonoyan, Rodolphe Momier +2 more

The probabilities of atomic transitions F e − F g = ± 2 between a ground F g and an excited F e level of the D 2 line of any alkali metal atom are zero when no external magnetic field is applied. In an external magnetic field in the range of 0.1–3 kG, the probabilities of these transitions called magnetically induced (MI) are highly modified. For MI transitions, we previously exhibited the following rule: the probabilities of MI transitions with Δ F = + 2 are maximal when using σ + -polarized laser radiation, while the probabilities of MI transitions with Δ F = − 2 are maximal when using σ − -polarized laser radiation. This difference has been termed type 1 MI circular dichroism. It is demonstrated for the first time, to our knowledge, that for alkali atoms with a nuclear spin I = 3 / 2 ( 87 R b , 39 K , 23 N a , 7 L i ) in magnetic fields > 100 G , the probability of the strongest σ + MI transition of the group F g = 1 → F e = 3 ′ (transition | 1 , − 1 ⟩ → | 3 ′ , 0 ′ ⟩ ) is about four times higher than the probabilities of the strongest MI σ − -transitions | 1 , − 1 ⟩ → | 3 ′ , − 2 ′ ⟩ and | 2 , + 1 ⟩ → | 0 ′ , 0 ′ ⟩ . These properties make the σ + MI transition | 1 , − 1 ⟩ → <m

arXiv:2112.07351•Journal of the Optical Society of America B•Feb 10, 2022•8 citations

Derivation of the dipole approximation from the exact transition probabilities for hydrogen atoms

H. E. Moses

The usual dipole approximation for the transition probabilities for hydrogen atoms is derived from the exact transition probabilities by considering $j=1$ photons only, neglecting retardation, and using an identity derived from the wave equation for the radial wave function for the atom.

Physical Review A•Jun 1, 1975•2 citations
The probabilities of atomic transitions F e − F g = ± 2 between a ground F g and an excited F e level of the D 2 line of any alkali metal atom are zero when no external magnetic field is applied. In an external magnetic field in the range of 0.1–3 kG, the probabilities of these transitions called magnetically induced (MI) are highly modified. For MI transitions, we previously exhibited the following rule: the probabilities of MI transitions with Δ F = + 2 are maximal when using σ + -polarized laser radiation, while the probabilities of MI transitions with Δ F = − 2 are maximal when using σ − -polarized laser radiation. This difference has been termed type 1 MI circular dichroism. It is demonstrated for the first time, to our knowledge, that for alkali atoms with a nuclear spin I = 3 / 2 ( 87 R b , 39 K , 23 N a , 7 L i ) in magnetic fields > 100 G , the probability of the strongest σ + MI transition of the group F g = 1 → F e = 3 ′ (transition | 1 , − 1 ⟩ → | 3 ′ , 0 ′ ⟩ ) is about four times higher than the probabilities of the strongest MI σ − -transitions | 1 , − 1 ⟩ → | 3 ′ , − 2 ′ ⟩ and | 2 , + 1 ⟩ → | 0 ′ , 0 ′ ⟩ . These properties make the σ + MI transition | 1 , − 1 ⟩ → <m
The usual dipole approximation for the transition probabilities for hydrogen atoms is derived from the exact transition probabilities by considering j=1j=1j=1 photons only, neglecting retardation, and using an identity derived from the wave equation for the radial wave function for the atom.