Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Il Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. B/Il Nuovo cimento B

Reflection off a reflecting surface in quantum mechanics: Where do the reflections actually occur?

Edward B. Manoukian

Published Jun 1, 1987• 11 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf02726576

Related papers

Reflection off a reflecting surface in quantum mechanics: Where do the reflections actually occur?

Edward B. Manoukian

Il Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. B/Il Nuovo cimento B•Aug 1, 1987•10 citations

Reflection off a reflecting surface in quantum mechanics. -III

Edward B. Manoukian

Il Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. B/Il Nuovo cimento B•Jul 1, 1990•3 citations

Tunneling

David K. Ferry

When we dealt with the finite potential well in the last chapter, it was observed that the wave function penetrated into the barriers. This process does not occur in classical mechanics, since a particle will actually bounce off the barrier. However, when we treat the particle as a wave, then the wave nature of barrier penetration can occur. This is familiar in electromagnetic waves, where the decaying wave (as opposed to a propagating wave) is termed an evanescent wave. For energies below the top of the barrier, the wave is attenuated, and it decays exponentially. Yet, it takes a significant distance for this decay to eliminate the wave completely. If the barrier is thinner than this critical distance, the evanescent wave can excite a propagating wave in the region beyond the barrier. In optics, this effect is termed frustrated total internal reflection . We are familiar with total internal reflection just from a swimming pool. Water has a higher dielectric constant than free space, so when we are under water, there is critical angle beyond which we can no longer see out (from under the water) of the pool. In optics, we can use a prism, and there will be reflection from the back surface for angles greater than a critical angle. The wave in back of the prism is attenuated and decaying. But, if we place another high dielectric constant material close to the prism, the decaying wave can excite a wave in this new material. 1 Thus, the wave can penetrate the barrier and continue to propagate, with an attenuated amplitude, in the trans-barrier region. For particles, this process is termed tunneling , with analogy to the miners who burrow through a mountain in order to get to the other side! In fact, it is known that the nuclear fusion process by which our sun produces its power would not occur were there no tunneling. The intra-nuclear repulsion is just too strong and tunneling is required for the nuclei to find one another.

CRC Press eBooks•Aug 19, 2026•0 citations

Geometric Aspects of Space-Time Reflection Symmetry in Quantum Mechanics

Carl M. Bender, Dorje C. Brody, Lane P. Hughston +1 more

Springer proceedings in physics•Jan 1, 2016•2 citations

Indirect Knowability of Inner Constitution: The Interpretation of Quantum Theory

Michael Whiteman

In all such cases it would perhaps be a more satisfactory mode of speech to say that we do not in fact have any knowledge of the person, thing, or conceptual structure in question. We do not know Julius Caesar; we only imagine what kind of happenings probably occurred in his life. We do not actually see the other side of the moon; we only see a photographic emulsion on which the light and dark shading is reasonably taken as copying other shadings reasonably taken as caused by light reflected from the surface of the moon; and so with the other examples. In what sense, then, can we have 'indirect' knowledge of the inner constitution of nature? Do we only imagine the sort of existence or conditions which might reasonably be supposed to be constituted 'behind the scenes'? In that case, what is the kind of 'reason' to which we are appealing?

Routledge eBooks•Jun 3, 2014•0 citations

Quantum Reflection of Atoms from a Surface

Springer eBooks•Dec 12, 2005•0 citations
When we dealt with the finite potential well in the last chapter, it was observed that the wave function penetrated into the barriers. This process does not occur in classical mechanics, since a particle will actually bounce off the barrier. However, when we treat the particle as a wave, then the wave nature of barrier penetration can occur. This is familiar in electromagnetic waves, where the decaying wave (as opposed to a propagating wave) is termed an evanescent wave. For energies below the top of the barrier, the wave is attenuated, and it decays exponentially. Yet, it takes a significant distance for this decay to eliminate the wave completely. If the barrier is thinner than this critical distance, the evanescent wave can excite a propagating wave in the region beyond the barrier. In optics, this effect is termed frustrated total internal reflection . We are familiar with total internal reflection just from a swimming pool. Water has a higher dielectric constant than free space, so when we are under water, there is critical angle beyond which we can no longer see out (from under the water) of the pool. In optics, we can use a prism, and there will be reflection from the back surface for angles greater than a critical angle. The wave in back of the prism is attenuated and decaying. But, if we place another high dielectric constant material close to the prism, the decaying wave can excite a wave in this new material. 1 Thus, the wave can penetrate the barrier and continue to propagate, with an attenuated amplitude, in the trans-barrier region. For particles, this process is termed tunneling , with analogy to the miners who burrow through a mountain in order to get to the other side! In fact, it is known that the nuclear fusion process by which our sun produces its power would not occur were there no tunneling. The intra-nuclear repulsion is just too strong and tunneling is required for the nuclei to find one another.
In all such cases it would perhaps be a more satisfactory mode of speech to say that we do not in fact have any knowledge of the person, thing, or conceptual structure in question. We do not know Julius Caesar; we only imagine what kind of happenings probably occurred in his life. We do not actually see the other side of the moon; we only see a photographic emulsion on which the light and dark shading is reasonably taken as copying other shadings reasonably taken as caused by light reflected from the surface of the moon; and so with the other examples. In what sense, then, can we have 'indirect' knowledge of the inner constitution of nature? Do we only imagine the sort of existence or conditions which might reasonably be supposed to be constituted 'behind the scenes'? In that case, what is the kind of 'reason' to which we are appealing?