Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks (WiSec)

PHY-layer security is no alternative to cryptography

Pieter Robyns, Peter Quax, Wim Lamotte

Published Jul 13, 2017• 7 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In recent works, numerous physical-layer security systems have been proposed as alternatives to classic cryptography. Such systems aim to use the intrinsic properties of radio signals and the wireless medium to provide confidentiality and authentication to wireless devices. However, fundamental vulnerabilities are often discovered in these systems shortly after their inception. We therefore challenge the assumptions made by existing physical-layer security systems, and postulate that weaker assumptions are needed in order to adapt for practical scenarios. We also argue that if no computational advantage over an adversary can be ensured, secure communication cannot be realistically achieved.

DOI
10.1145/3098243.3098271

Related papers

Physical Layer Security for Next Generation Wireless Networks: Theories, Technologies, and Challenges

Yiliang Liu, Hsiao‐Hwa Chen, Liangmin Wang

Physical layer security (PHY-security) takes the advantages of channel randomness nature of transmission media to achieve communication confidentiality and authentication. Wiretap coding and signal processing technologies are expected to play vital roles in this new security mechanism. PHY-security has attracted a lot of attention due to its unique features and the fact that our daily life relies heavily on wireless communications for sensitive and private information transmissions. Compared to conventional cryptography that works to ensure all involved entities to load proper and authenticated cryptographic information, PHY-security technologies perform security functions without considering about how those security protocols are executed. In other words, it does not require to implement any extra security schemes or algorithms on other layers above the physical layer. This survey introduces the fundamental theories of PHY-security, covering confidentiality and authentication, and provides an overview on the state-of-the-art works on PHY-security technologies that can provide secure communications in wireless systems, along with the discussions on challenges and their proposed solutions. Furthermore, at the end of this paper, the open issues are identified as our future research directions.

IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials•Aug 10, 2016•706 citations

Channel independent physical layer security

Z. Esat Ankaralı, Mustafa Harun Yılmaz, Mohammed Hafez +1 more

Security is one of the key requirements of wireless communication systems. By exploiting the broadcast nature of wireless medium, a malicious user might attempt to mislead the legitimate nodes, intercept the communication and overhear the private information. In order to combat against such malicious attacks, various encryption using security techniques have been proposed in the literature. Recently, physical layer (PHY) security has emerged as an additional countermeasure to the encryption based approaches and become very popular. Unlike cryptography, PHY security techniques target to protect the signal itself rather than encrypting the information bits. However, most of these techniques are designed based on specific channel conditions. Since channel has a random nature and cannot be controlled by users, such a design approach may remain unreliable for many practical scenarios where the desired channel state does not exist. Therefore, in this study, we highlight the importance of the channel independent PHY security techniques. In order to draft the ongoing efforts and provide the open issues in this direction, three different concepts are discussed along with the reviews of sample studies.

The ... IEEE Annual Wireless and Microwave Technology Conference•Apr 1, 2016•2 citations

The challenges facing physical layer security

Wade K. Trappe

There has recently been significant interest in applying the principles of information-theoretical security and signal processing to secure physical layer systems. Although the community has made progress in understanding how the physical layer can support confidentiality and authentication, it is important to realize that there are many important issues that must be addressed if physical layer security is ever to be adopted by real and practical security systems. In this article, I briefly review several different flavors of physical layer security (at least for wireless systems), and then identify aspects (a.k.a. weaknesses) where the foundation for physical layer security needs to be strengthened. I then highlight that the opportunities for applying physical layer security to real systems will be quite rich if the community can overcome these challenges. In the course of the article, I note new directions for the community to investigate, with the objective of keeping physical layer security research targeted at having a practical impact on real systems.

IEEE Communications Magazine•Jun 1, 2015•278 citations

Cooperative Security at the Physical Layer: A Summary of Recent Advances

Raef Bassily, Ersen Ekrem, Xiang He +5 more

Wireless communications systems are particularly vulnerable to security attacks because of the inherent openness of the transmission medium. In this article, we focus on guaranteeing confidentiality against eavesdropping attacks where an unauthorized entity aims to intercept an ongoing wireless communication, and we provide a comprehensive summary of recent advances in the area of physical-layer security that guarantees confidentiality by using cooperative techniques unique to the wireless medium. These cooperative techniques consist of carefully designed coding and signaling schemes that are able to harness the properties of the physical layer and to ensure some level of information-theoretic security.

IEEE Signal Processing Magazine•Aug 19, 2013•189 citations

Fundamentals of Physical Layer Security

Xiangyun Zhou, Lingyang Song, Yan Zhang

In virtually all communication systems, the issues of authentication, confidentiality, and privacy are handled in the upper layers of the protocol stack using variations of private-key and public-key cryptosystems. These cryptosystems are usually based upon mathematical operations, such as the factorization into prime factors, believed hard to perform for an attacker with limited computational power; hence, we refer to the security provided by these systems as computational security. While computational security has a clear trackrecord of proven effectiveness, it may be difficult to implement in some emerging network architectures. For example, the advent of wireless networks has fostered the development of mobile adhoc networks comprised of many devices with heterogenous capabilities; the wide range of computing power available in the devices makes it difficult to deploy a public-key infrastructure. In contrast with the established practice of computational security, many results from information theory, signal processing, and cryptography suggest that there is much security to be gained by accounting for the imperfections of the physical layer when designing secure systems. For instance, while noise and fading are usually treated as impairments in wireless communications, information-theoretic results show that they can be harnessed to “hide” messages from a potential eavesdropper or authenticate devices, without requiring a shared secret key. Such results, if they can be implemented in a costefficient way without sacrificing much data rate, call for the design of security solutions at the physical layer itself to complement computational security mechanisms.

CRC Press eBooks•Nov 7, 2013•10 citations

Wireless physical layer security

H. Vincent Poor, Rafael F. Schaefer

Security in wireless networks has traditionally been considered to be an issue to be addressed separately from the physical radio transmission aspects of wireless systems. However, with the emergence of new networking architectures that are not amenable to traditional methods of secure communication such as data encryption, there has been an increase in interest in the potential of the physical properties of the radio channel itself to provide communications security. Information theory provides a natural framework for the study of this issue, and there has been considerable recent research devoted to using this framework to develop a greater understanding of the fundamental ability of the so-called physical layer to provide security in wireless networks. Moreover, this approach is also suggestive in many cases of coding techniques that can approach fundamental limits in practice and of techniques for other security tasks such as authentication. This paper provides an overview of these developments.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences•Dec 27, 2016•337 citations
In recent works, numerous physical-layer security systems have been proposed as alternatives to classic cryptography. Such systems aim to use the intrinsic properties of radio signals and the wireless medium to provide confidentiality and authentication to wireless devices. However, fundamental vulnerabilities are often discovered in these systems shortly after their inception. We therefore challenge the assumptions made by existing physical-layer security systems, and postulate that weaker assumptions are needed in order to adapt for practical scenarios. We also argue that if no computational advantage over an adversary can be ensured, secure communication cannot be realistically achieved.
Physical layer security (PHY-security) takes the advantages of channel randomness nature of transmission media to achieve communication confidentiality and authentication. Wiretap coding and signal processing technologies are expected to play vital roles in this new security mechanism. PHY-security has attracted a lot of attention due to its unique features and the fact that our daily life relies heavily on wireless communications for sensitive and private information transmissions. Compared to conventional cryptography that works to ensure all involved entities to load proper and authenticated cryptographic information, PHY-security technologies perform security functions without considering about how those security protocols are executed. In other words, it does not require to implement any extra security schemes or algorithms on other layers above the physical layer. This survey introduces the fundamental theories of PHY-security, covering confidentiality and authentication, and provides an overview on the state-of-the-art works on PHY-security technologies that can provide secure communications in wireless systems, along with the discussions on challenges and their proposed solutions. Furthermore, at the end of this paper, the open issues are identified as our future research directions.
Security is one of the key requirements of wireless communication systems. By exploiting the broadcast nature of wireless medium, a malicious user might attempt to mislead the legitimate nodes, intercept the communication and overhear the private information. In order to combat against such malicious attacks, various encryption using security techniques have been proposed in the literature. Recently, physical layer (PHY) security has emerged as an additional countermeasure to the encryption based approaches and become very popular. Unlike cryptography, PHY security techniques target to protect the signal itself rather than encrypting the information bits. However, most of these techniques are designed based on specific channel conditions. Since channel has a random nature and cannot be controlled by users, such a design approach may remain unreliable for many practical scenarios where the desired channel state does not exist. Therefore, in this study, we highlight the importance of the channel independent PHY security techniques. In order to draft the ongoing efforts and provide the open issues in this direction, three different concepts are discussed along with the reviews of sample studies.
There has recently been significant interest in applying the principles of information-theoretical security and signal processing to secure physical layer systems. Although the community has made progress in understanding how the physical layer can support confidentiality and authentication, it is important to realize that there are many important issues that must be addressed if physical layer security is ever to be adopted by real and practical security systems. In this article, I briefly review several different flavors of physical layer security (at least for wireless systems), and then identify aspects (a.k.a. weaknesses) where the foundation for physical layer security needs to be strengthened. I then highlight that the opportunities for applying physical layer security to real systems will be quite rich if the community can overcome these challenges. In the course of the article, I note new directions for the community to investigate, with the objective of keeping physical layer security research targeted at having a practical impact on real systems.
Wireless communications systems are particularly vulnerable to security attacks because of the inherent openness of the transmission medium. In this article, we focus on guaranteeing confidentiality against eavesdropping attacks where an unauthorized entity aims to intercept an ongoing wireless communication, and we provide a comprehensive summary of recent advances in the area of physical-layer security that guarantees confidentiality by using cooperative techniques unique to the wireless medium. These cooperative techniques consist of carefully designed coding and signaling schemes that are able to harness the properties of the physical layer and to ensure some level of information-theoretic security.
In virtually all communication systems, the issues of authentication, confidentiality, and privacy are handled in the upper layers of the protocol stack using variations of private-key and public-key cryptosystems. These cryptosystems are usually based upon mathematical operations, such as the factorization into prime factors, believed hard to perform for an attacker with limited computational power; hence, we refer to the security provided by these systems as computational security. While computational security has a clear trackrecord of proven effectiveness, it may be difficult to implement in some emerging network architectures. For example, the advent of wireless networks has fostered the development of mobile adhoc networks comprised of many devices with heterogenous capabilities; the wide range of computing power available in the devices makes it difficult to deploy a public-key infrastructure. In contrast with the established practice of computational security, many results from information theory, signal processing, and cryptography suggest that there is much security to be gained by accounting for the imperfections of the physical layer when designing secure systems. For instance, while noise and fading are usually treated as impairments in wireless communications, information-theoretic results show that they can be harnessed to “hide” messages from a potential eavesdropper or authenticate devices, without requiring a shared secret key. Such results, if they can be implemented in a costefficient way without sacrificing much data rate, call for the design of security solutions at the physical layer itself to complement computational security mechanisms.
Security in wireless networks has traditionally been considered to be an issue to be addressed separately from the physical radio transmission aspects of wireless systems. However, with the emergence of new networking architectures that are not amenable to traditional methods of secure communication such as data encryption, there has been an increase in interest in the potential of the physical properties of the radio channel itself to provide communications security. Information theory provides a natural framework for the study of this issue, and there has been considerable recent research devoted to using this framework to develop a greater understanding of the fundamental ability of the so-called physical layer to provide security in wireless networks. Moreover, this approach is also suggestive in many cases of coding techniques that can approach fundamental limits in practice and of techniques for other security tasks such as authentication. This paper provides an overview of these developments.