Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Precision Measurements in $^{37}$K

M. Anholm, D. Ashery, Spencer Behling, Benjamin Fenker, D. Melconian, M. Mehlman, John Behr, Alexandre Gorelov, K. Olchanski, Claire Preston, Claire Warner, G. Gwinner

Published Oct 29, 2015• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Can we make precision measurements more precise

James K. Thompson, S. Sankar, Zilong Chen

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•May 31, 2008•0 citations

Conway–Kochen and the Finite Precision Loophole

Ronnie Hermens

arXiv:1404.2114•Foundations of Physics•Aug 11, 2014•2 citations

Loss-induced limits to phase measurement precision with maximally entangled states

Mark A. Rubin, Sumanth Kaushik

The presence of loss limits the precision of an approach to phase measurement using maximally entangled states, also referred to as NOON states. A calculation using a simple beam-splitter model of loss shows that, for all nonzero values $L$ of the loss, phase measurement precision degrades with increasing number $N$ of entangled photons for $N$ sufficiently large. For $L$ above a critical value of approximately 0.785, phase measurement precision degrades with increasing $N$ for all values of $N$. For $L$ near zero, phase measurement precision improves with increasing $N$ down to a limiting precision of approximately $1.018L\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\text{radians}$, attained at $N$ approximately equal to $2.218∕L$, and degrades as $N$ increases beyond this value. Phase measurement precision with multiple measurements and a fixed total number of photons ${N}_{T}$ is also examined. For $L$ above a critical value of approximately 0.586, the ratio of phase measurement precision attainable with NOON states to that attainable by conventional methods using unentangled coherent states degrades with increasing $N$, the number of entangled photons employed in a single measurement, for all values of $N$. For $L$ near zero this ratio is optimized by using approximately $N=1.279∕L$ entangled photons in each measurement, yielding a precision of approximately $1.340\sqrt{L∕{N}_{T}}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\text{radians}$.

arXiv:quant-ph/0612080•Physical Review A•May 7, 2007•100 citations

Enhancing the Estimation Precision with Quantum Weak Measurement in the Presence of Noise

Fei Yao, Junsen Lai, Meng Zhang +3 more

In this study, we investigate whether the weak measurement can enhance the estimation precision, when coupling between system and measurement apparatus is extremely weak. Our result shows that the weak measurement could enhance the estimation precision, when the noise is introduced during interaction process. By calculating and comparing the Fisher information under weak measurement and traditional quantum measurement scheme, we quantify the precision-improvement by the weak measurement and find the optimal post-selection protocol. Furthermore, we argue that there exists a threshold for the noise strength that the quantum weak measurement renders a higher precision compared to the traditional measurement.

International Conference on Computing, Communication, Perception and Quantum Technology (CCPQT)•Aug 4, 2023•0 citations

The Large N Expansion

Assa Auerbach

Graduate texts in contemporary physics•Jan 1, 1994•0 citations

Quantum-Limited and Ultra-Precision Measurements

J. M. Geremia

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 5, 2007•0 citations
Precision Measurements in 37^{37}37K
The presence of loss limits the precision of an approach to phase measurement using maximally entangled states, also referred to as NOON states. A calculation using a simple beam-splitter model of loss shows that, for all nonzero values LLL of the loss, phase measurement precision degrades with increasing number NNN of entangled photons for NNN sufficiently large. For LLL above a critical value of approximately 0.785, phase measurement precision degrades with increasing NNN for all values of NNN. For LLL near zero, phase measurement precision improves with increasing NNN down to a limiting precision of approximately 1.018Lradians1.018L\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\text{radians}1.018Lradians, attained at NNN approximately equal to 2.218∕L2.218∕L2.218∕L, and degrades as NNN increases beyond this value. Phase measurement precision with multiple measurements and a fixed total number of photons NT{N}_{T}NT​ is also examined. For LLL above a critical value of approximately 0.586, the ratio of phase measurement precision attainable with NOON states to that attainable by conventional methods using unentangled coherent states degrades with increasing NNN, the number of entangled photons employed in a single measurement, for all values of NNN. For LLL near zero this ratio is optimized by using approximately N=1.279∕LN=1.279∕LN=1.279∕L entangled photons in each measurement, yielding a precision of approximately 1.340L∕NTradians1.340\sqrt{L∕{N}_{T}}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\text{radians}1.340L∕NT​​radians.
In this study, we investigate whether the weak measurement can enhance the estimation precision, when coupling between system and measurement apparatus is extremely weak. Our result shows that the weak measurement could enhance the estimation precision, when the noise is introduced during interaction process. By calculating and comparing the Fisher information under weak measurement and traditional quantum measurement scheme, we quantify the precision-improvement by the weak measurement and find the optimal post-selection protocol. Furthermore, we argue that there exists a threshold for the noise strength that the quantum weak measurement renders a higher precision compared to the traditional measurement.