Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1404.2114 · Foundations of Physics

Conway–Kochen and the Finite Precision Loophole

Ronnie Hermens

Published Aug 11, 2014• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s10701-014-9827-8

Related papers

Kochen-Specker Theorem

Cecilia Flori

Lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 2013•18 citations

Notes on the Conway-Kochen Twin Argument

Stephen L. Adler

This is a revision of my original posting, in which I raised objections to part of the Conway-Kochen argument. I now agree with them that their recent reply answers my original concerns. In the first part of these notes (identical to the original), I give a reformulation of the part of the Conway-Kochen result that closes the contextuality loophole in the original Kochen-Specker (KS) theorem. In the second part (modified in this revision) I review my concerns connected with the finite time needed to make a measurement, and briefly indicate how Conway and Kochen have reponded to them.

arXiv:quant-ph/0604122•Apr 17, 2006•1 citation

The Kochen-Specker and Conway-Kochen Theorems

Ahmed Barbar

This essay provides an analysis of two important theorems that arise in the context of quantum mechanics: the Kochen-Specker theorem, which challenges the existence of hidden variable theories; and the Conway-Kochen (free will) theorem, which can be seen as an improvement over the Kochen-Specker theorem, but instead focuses on challenging determinism.

•May 5, 2017•0 citations

Generalized Kochen-Specker theorem

Asher Peres

arXiv:quant-ph/9510018•Foundations of Physics•Jun 1, 1996•22 citations

On Conway and Kochen's "Thou shalt not clone one bit!"

N. David Mermin

A physicists' explanation of why thou shalt not clone one bit gives a stronger version of Conway and Kochen's theorem.

arXiv:0808.1581•Aug 11, 2008•0 citations

The Quantum Kepler Problem

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Dec 1, 2002•0 citations
This is a revision of my original posting, in which I raised objections to part of the Conway-Kochen argument. I now agree with them that their recent reply answers my original concerns. In the first part of these notes (identical to the original), I give a reformulation of the part of the Conway-Kochen result that closes the contextuality loophole in the original Kochen-Specker (KS) theorem. In the second part (modified in this revision) I review my concerns connected with the finite time needed to make a measurement, and briefly indicate how Conway and Kochen have reponded to them.