Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum and Classical Momentum Distributions. I. Theory and elementary examples

Hans Jürgen Korsch, B. Schnellhaß

Published Jan 1, 2000• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Quantum, classical and semiclassical momentum distributions: I. Theory and elementary examples

H. J. Korsch, B Schellhaaß

We discuss the basic properties of momentum distributions in quantum mechanics for elementary systems as well as their classical analogue. Semiclassical approximations can show a quantitative connection between the classical and quantum cases. We believe that such distributions provide a useful tool to improve the understanding of elementary quantum mechanics. Important differences between distributions in coordinate and momentum space are pointed out. Elementary examples (free and uniformly accelerating particle, harmonic oscillator and square-well potential) are discussed.

European Journal of Physics•Jan 1, 2000•11 citations

Quantum Momentum Distributions

Benjamin Withers, H. R. Glyde

Journal of Low Temperature Physics•Apr 11, 2007•5 citations

Momentum Distributions: An Overview

Paul E. Sokol, Richard N. Silver, J. W. Clark

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1989•9 citations

Correlation coefficient for incompatible observables of the quantum harmonic oscillator

Richard A. Campos

We explore, using elementary examples of harmonic-oscillator superposition states, the quantum-mechanical measures of covariance and correlation coefficient for two noncommuting observables. A Schrödinger cat state which provides perfect correlation or anticorrelation of the position and momentum operators is presented. We employ quantum and classical phase-space distributions as graphical illustrations of correlation coefficients for the two theories.

American Journal of Physics•Aug 1, 1998•14 citations

An example showing the non-uniqueness of a wavefunction given its position and momentum distributions

Mark S. Ashbaugh

The author presents an elementary example which shows that position and momentum distributions do not uniquely determine the wavefunction. In particular, the example shows that a wavefunction consisting of two gaussian wavepackets with momenta k 1 and k 2 has the same position and momentum distributions as the wavefunction obtained by interchanging k 1 and k 2 . This interpretation relies on viewing the wavefunction as that of a free particle but, of course, the abstract result is simply that for f in L 2 (R) knowledge of mod f(x) mod and mod f(k) mod is not always sufficient to determine f(x) (or f(k); here f denotes the Fourier transform of f). In addition, the bearing of the example presented here upon certain interesting questions raised by Vogt (1978) is discussed.

Inverse Problems•Nov 1, 1986•0 citations

On momentum states in quantum mechanics

M. Fannes, André F. Verbeure, Ricardo Weder

Annales De L Institut Henri Poincare-physique Theorique•Jan 1, 1974•11 citations
We discuss the basic properties of momentum distributions in quantum mechanics for elementary systems as well as their classical analogue. Semiclassical approximations can show a quantitative connection between the classical and quantum cases. We believe that such distributions provide a useful tool to improve the understanding of elementary quantum mechanics. Important differences between distributions in coordinate and momentum space are pointed out. Elementary examples (free and uniformly accelerating particle, harmonic oscillator and square-well potential) are discussed.
The author presents an elementary example which shows that position and momentum distributions do not uniquely determine the wavefunction. In particular, the example shows that a wavefunction consisting of two gaussian wavepackets with momenta k 1 and k 2 has the same position and momentum distributions as the wavefunction obtained by interchanging k 1 and k 2 . This interpretation relies on viewing the wavefunction as that of a free particle but, of course, the abstract result is simply that for f in L 2 (R) knowledge of mod f(x) mod and mod f(k) mod is not always sufficient to determine f(x) (or f(k); here f denotes the Fourier transform of f). In addition, the bearing of the example presented here upon certain interesting questions raised by Vogt (1978) is discussed.