Tunnel-ionization is investigated in the framework of relativistic quantum mechanics. \nFor an arbitrary constant electromagnetic field a gauge invariant energy \noperator is introduced in order to identify the classically forbidden region for \ntunnel-ionization. Furthermore, relativistic features of tunnel-ionization are explored. \nA one-dimensional intuitive picture predicts that the ionized electron wave \npacket in the relativistic regime experiences a momentum shift along the laser’s \npropagation direction. This is shown to be consistent with the well-known strong \nfield approximation. Furthermore, spin dynamics in tunnel-ionization process \nis discussed in the standard as well as in the dressed strong field approximation. \nNext, the tunneling time delay is investigated for tunnel-ionization by extending \nthe definition of the Wigner time delay. Later, this concept is redefined in terms of \nthe phase of the fixed energy propagator. The developed formalism is applied to \nthe deep-tunneling and the near-threshold-tunneling regimes. It is shown that in \nthe latter case signatures of the tunneling time delay can be measurable at remote \ndistance. Finally, the path-dependent formulation of gauge theory is discussed. It \nis demonstrated that this equivalent formulation of gauge theory leads to a canonical \ngauge fixing, in which the Feynman path integral becomes more intuitive and \nthe calculation of the quasiclassical propagator is considerably simplified
Tunnel-ionization is investigated in the framework of relativistic quantum mechanics. \nFor an arbitrary constant electromagnetic field a gauge invariant energy \noperator is introduced in order to identify the classically forbidden region for \ntunnel-ionization. Furthermore, relativistic features of tunnel-ionization are explored. \nA one-dimensional intuitive picture predicts that the ionized electron wave \npacket in the relativistic regime experiences a momentum shift along the laser’s \npropagation direction. This is shown to be consistent with the well-known strong \nfield approximation. Furthermore, spin dynamics in tunnel-ionization process \nis discussed in the standard as well as in the dressed strong field approximation. \nNext, the tunneling time delay is investigated for tunnel-ionization by extending \nthe definition of the Wigner time delay. Later, this concept is redefined in terms of \nthe phase of the fixed energy propagator. The developed formalism is applied to \nthe deep-tunneling and the near-threshold-tunneling regimes. It is shown that in \nthe latter case signatures of the tunneling time delay can be measurable at remote \ndistance. Finally, the path-dependent formulation of gauge theory is discussed. It \nis demonstrated that this equivalent formulation of gauge theory leads to a canonical \ngauge fixing, in which the Feynman path integral becomes more intuitive and \nthe calculation of the quasiclassical propagator is considerably simplified
Recent attoclock experiments and theoretical studies regarding the strong-field ionization of atoms by few-cycle infrared pulses revealed features that have attracted much attention. Here we investigate tunneling ionization and the dynamics of the electron probability using Bohmian mechanics. We consider a one-dimensional problem to illustrate the underlying mechanisms of the ionization process. It is revealed that in the major part of the below-the-barrier ionization regime, in an intense and short infrared pulse, the electron does not tunnel through the entire barrier, but rather starts already from the classically forbidden region. Moreover, we highlight the correspondence between the probability of locating the electron at a particular initial position and its asymptotic momentum. Bohmian mechanics also provides a natural definition of mean tunneling time and exit position, taking account of the time dependence of the barrier. Finally, we find that the electron can exit the barrier with significant kinetic energy, thereby corroborating the results of a recent study [N. Camus et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 023201 (2017)].
A clear consensus on how long it takes a particle to tunnel through a potential barrier has never been so urgently required, since the electron dynamics in strong-field ionization can be resolved on attosecond time-scale in experiment and the exact nature of the tunneling process is the key to trigger subsequent attosecond techniques. Here a general picture of tunneling time is suggested by introducing a quantum travel time, which is defined as the ratio of the travel distance to the expected value of the velocity operator under the barrier. Specially, if applied to rectangular barrier tunneling, it can retrieve the Büttiker-Landauer time τBL in the case of an opaque barrier, and has a clear physical meaning in the case of a very thin barrier wherein τBL can not be well defined. In the case of strong-field tunneling process, with the help of the newly defined time, the tunneling delay time measured by attoclock experiment can be interpreted as a travel time spent by the electron to tunnel from a point under the barrier to the tunnel exit. In addition, a peculiar oscillation structure in the wavelength dependence of tunneling delay time in deep tunneling regime is observed, which is beyond the scope of adiabatic tunneling picture. This oscillation structure can be attributed to the interference between the ground state tunneling channel and the excited states tunneling channels.
We study the effect of spin flip on tunneling ionization in the attoclock settings. Our study is based on a fully relativistic approach in which we seek a numerical solution of the time-dependent Dirac equation. We find that spin flip during strong field ionization significantly increases the attoclock offset angle, indicating longer tunneling delay relative to electrons with no spin flip. To interpret our numerical findings, we conduct additional modeling within the perturbative Breit-Pauli approach, which allows us to elucidate the role of different relativistic mechanisms. We show that the spin-orbit interaction is mainly responsible for the spin flip, rather than interaction with the magnetic component of the laser field. We further discuss the dynamic mechanisms of the spin-flip effect, suggesting that it takes place while the electron is still bound. Our findings indicate that the attoclock can be used to investigate electron spin-flip dynamics during the tunnel ionization process.
The measurement of the tunneling time in attosecond experiments, termed attoclock, triggered a hot debate about the tunneling time, the role of time in quantum mechanics, where the interaction with the laser pulse involves two regimes of a different character, the multiphoton and the tunneling (field-) ionization. In the adiabatic field calibration, one of us (O. K.) developed in earlier works a real tunneling time model and showed that the model fits well to the experimental data of Landsmann et al. (Optica {\bf 1}, 343 2014). In the present work, it is shown that the model explains the experimental result in the nonadiabatic field calibration, where one reaches a good agreement with the experimental data of Hofmann et al. (J. of Mod. Opt. {\bf 66}, 1052, 2019). Furthermore, we confirm the result with the numerical integration of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. The model is appealing because it offers a clear picture of the multiphoton and tunneling field-ionization regimes. In the nonadiabatic case (the nonadiabatic field calibration), the ionization is mainly driven by multiphoton absorption. Surprisingly, at a field strength F≤Fa (Fa is the atomic field strength) the model always predicts a time delay with respect to the quantum limit τa at F=Fa. For an adiabatic tunneling the saturation at the limit (F=Fa) explains the well-known Hartman effect or Hartman paradox.
Tunneling and tunneling time are hot debated and very interesting issues because of their fundamental role in the quantum mechanics. The measurement of the tunneling time in today's attosecond and strong field (low-frequency) experiments, despite its controversial discussion offers a fruitful opportunity to understand the time measurement and the role of time in quantum mechanics. In previous work Kullie (2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 , 052118), we suggested a model and derived a simple relation to calculate the tunneling time, which showed a good agreement with the experimental result for He-atom. In the present work we analyze and discuss our model considering the experimental result for H-atom, which is obtained recently by Satya Sainadh et al (2017 arXiv: 1707.05445 ). In the tunneling region, we find that our model shows a good agreement with their experimental result (similar to the He-atom in our previous work), and with the accompanied time-dependent Schrödiger equation simulations. However, Sainadh et al use a different picture of the tunneling, in which tunneling time becomes an imaginary quantity. Whereas our model represents a real tunneling time picture, precisely a delay time with respect to the ionization time at the atomic field strength. Moreover, even though the above-threshold-ionization is beyond the tunneling regime, we still see that the actual ionization time is related to our model. However, crucial points arise and keep some questions open especially on the experimental side.
The problem of time delay in tunneling ionization is revisited. The origin of time delay at the tunnel exit is analyzed, underlining the two faces of the concept of the tunneling time delay: the time delay around the tunnel exit and the asymptotic time delay at a detector. We show that the former time delay, in the sense of a delay in the peak of the wave function, exists as a matter of principle and arises due to the sub-barrier interference of the reflected and transmitted components of the tunneling electronic wave packet. We exemplify this by describing the tunneling ionization of an electron bound by a short-range potential within the strong-field approximation in a ``deep tunneling'' regime. If sub-barrier reflections are extracted from this wave function, then the time delay of the peak is shown to vanish. Thus, we assert that the disturbance of the tunneling wave packet by the reflection from the surface of the barrier causes a time delay in the neighborhood of the tunnel exit.