Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Physics Letters

Alternative Approach for Quantum Computation in a Cavity QED

A. Chouikh, Taoufik Said, Mohamed Bennai

Published Apr 1, 2017• 4 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.18576/qpl/060109

Related papers

Quantum computation in the decoherence-free subspaces with cavity QED

Yue-Yue Chen, Xun‐Li Feng, C. H. Oh

Quantum Information Processing•Nov 11, 2013•6 citations

Engineered Cavity QED Systems for Quantum Computation.

Kevin Fortier

•May 1, 2008•0 citations

Cavity-QED tools for MBQC with optical binomial-codes

G. P. Teja, Radim Filip

Measurement-based quantum computation (MBQC) offers a promising paradigm for photonic quantum computing, but its implementation requires the generation of specific non-Gaussian resource states. While continuous-variable encodings such as the highly complex (GKP) states have been widely studied, the much simpler binomial codes offer an experimentally accessible alternative, though they demand a distinct set of operational tools. Here, we present a toolkit for MBQC using optical binomial codes, detailing a cavity-QED protocol for conditional generation of cluster states and the implementation of Pauli measurements. Our work proposes the first steps for existing optical atom-cavity architectures to lay the groundwork for their use in quantum computation.

quant-pharXiv:2601.15019•Jan 22, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Teleportation and Quantum Computation Based on Cavity QED

Tycho Sleator, Harald Weinfurter

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences•Apr 1, 1995•16 citations

Progress with cavity QED quantum computation with trapped rubidium atoms at

M. D. Barrett, J. A. Sauer, Michael Chapman

APS•Jun 1, 2000•0 citations

Quantum Information Processing in Cavity-QED

S. J. van Enk, Harry J. Kimble, Hideo Mabuchi

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2005•2 citations
Measurement-based quantum computation (MBQC) offers a promising paradigm for photonic quantum computing, but its implementation requires the generation of specific non-Gaussian resource states. While continuous-variable encodings such as the highly complex (GKP) states have been widely studied, the much simpler binomial codes offer an experimentally accessible alternative, though they demand a distinct set of operational tools. Here, we present a toolkit for MBQC using optical binomial codes, detailing a cavity-QED protocol for conditional generation of cluster states and the implementation of Pauli measurements. Our work proposes the first steps for existing optical atom-cavity architectures to lay the groundwork for their use in quantum computation.