Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Magnetic Phases of the Shastry-Sutherland Model using Projected Entangled Simplex States

Trithep Devakul, Adrian E. Feiguin

Published Mar 4, 2014• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Novel Quantum Phase Transition of the Shastry-Sutherland Model

Tôru Sakai, Hiroki Nakano

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 4, 2020•0 citations

Quantum phase transitions of the S=1 Shastry-Sutherland model

昌久 古賀, Akihisa Koga

•Jan 1, 2003•0 citations

Quantum Spin Liquid Phase in the Shastry-Sutherland Model Revealed by High-Precision Infinite Projected Entangled-Pair States

Philippe Corboz, Yining Zhang, Boris Ponsioen +1 more

The Shastry-Sutherland model is an effective model of the layered material SrCu_{2}(BO_{3})_{2}, which exhibits an extremely rich phase diagram as a function of pressure and magnetic field. Motivated by the recent controversy regarding its phase diagram at zero magnetic field, we perform large-scale simulations based on infinite projected entangled-pair states, a two-dimensional tensor network Ansatz to represent the ground state directly in the thermodynamic limit. By employing the latest optimization techniques, we obtain variational states with lower energy than previous results obtained from other methods. Using systematic extrapolations to the exact infinite bond dimension limit, our simulations reveal a narrow quantum spin liquid phase between the plaquette and antiferromagnetic phases in the range 0.785(5)≤J^{'}/J≤0.82(1).

arXiv:2502.14091•Physical Review Letters•Apr 13, 2026•6 citations

Tensor network study of the Shastry-Sutherland model in zero magnetic field

Philippe Corboz, Frédéric Mila

We simulate the Shastry-Sutherland model in two dimensions by means of infinite projected entangled-pair states (iPEPS)---a variational tensor network method where the accuracy can be systematically controlled by the so-called bond dimension. Besides the well-established dimer and N\'eel phase iPEPS confirms the presence of an intermediate phase with plaquette long-range order, and we determine its phase boundaries with high accuracy. The first-order phase transition for $J=0.675(2)$ between dimer and plaquette phase is compatible with previous series expansion results. iPEPS predicts a weak first-order phase transition between plaquette and N\'eel phase occurring for $J=0.765(15)$. We do not find a stable intermediate columnar-dimer phase, even when we bias the state towards this order.

arXiv:1212.2983•Physical Review B•Mar 27, 2013•190 citations

Crystals of Bound States in the Magnetization Plateaus of the Shastry-Sutherland Model

Philippe Corboz, Frédéric Mila

Using infinite projected entangled-pair states, we show that the Shastry-Sutherland model in an external magnetic field has low-magnetization plateaus which, in contrast to previous predictions, correspond to crystals of bound states of triplets, and not to crystals of triplets. The first sizable plateaus appear at magnetization 1/8, 2/15 and 1/6, in agreement with experiments on the orthogonal-dimer antiferromagnet SrCu2(BO3)2, and they can be naturally understood as regular patterns of bound states, including the intriguing 2/15 one. We also show that, even in a confined geometry, two triplets bind into a localized bound state with Sz=2. Finally, we discuss the role of competing domain-wall and supersolid phases, as well as that of additional anisotropic interactions.

arXiv:1401.3778•Physical Review Letters•Apr 10, 2014•165 citations

Spin dynamics of Shastry–Sutherland model

J. Bonča, Samir El Shawish, Igor Sega

Physica B Condensed Matter•Aug 25, 2006•1 citation
The Shastry-Sutherland model is an effective model of the layered material SrCu_{2}(BO_{3})_{2}, which exhibits an extremely rich phase diagram as a function of pressure and magnetic field. Motivated by the recent controversy regarding its phase diagram at zero magnetic field, we perform large-scale simulations based on infinite projected entangled-pair states, a two-dimensional tensor network Ansatz to represent the ground state directly in the thermodynamic limit. By employing the latest optimization techniques, we obtain variational states with lower energy than previous results obtained from other methods. Using systematic extrapolations to the exact infinite bond dimension limit, our simulations reveal a narrow quantum spin liquid phase between the plaquette and antiferromagnetic phases in the range 0.785(5)≤J^{'}/J≤0.82(1).
We simulate the Shastry-Sutherland model in two dimensions by means of infinite projected entangled-pair states (iPEPS)---a variational tensor network method where the accuracy can be systematically controlled by the so-called bond dimension. Besides the well-established dimer and N\'eel phase iPEPS confirms the presence of an intermediate phase with plaquette long-range order, and we determine its phase boundaries with high accuracy. The first-order phase transition for J=0.675(2)J=0.675(2)J=0.675(2) between dimer and plaquette phase is compatible with previous series expansion results. iPEPS predicts a weak first-order phase transition between plaquette and N\'eel phase occurring for J=0.765(15)J=0.765(15)J=0.765(15). We do not find a stable intermediate columnar-dimer phase, even when we bias the state towards this order.
Using infinite projected entangled-pair states, we show that the Shastry-Sutherland model in an external magnetic field has low-magnetization plateaus which, in contrast to previous predictions, correspond to crystals of bound states of triplets, and not to crystals of triplets. The first sizable plateaus appear at magnetization 1/8, 2/15 and 1/6, in agreement with experiments on the orthogonal-dimer antiferromagnet SrCu2(BO3)2, and they can be naturally understood as regular patterns of bound states, including the intriguing 2/15 one. We also show that, even in a confined geometry, two triplets bind into a localized bound state with Sz=2. Finally, we discuss the role of competing domain-wall and supersolid phases, as well as that of additional anisotropic interactions.