T HE CLASSIFICATION OF DISTINCT PHASES OF MATTER is a central theme in condensed matter physics. A phase of matter can be viewed as an equivalence class of physical states that share a certain set of properties. In the case of topological quantum matter, these properties are associated with topological invariants that take specific values for each equivalence class. Perturbing a gapped state that corresponds to a given topological phase (i.e., smoothly deforming the Hamiltonian of the system) does not affect the topological invariant, as long as the energy gap remains finite. The value of this invariant changes only if the system undergoes a quantum phase transition, which is signaled by the collapse of the gap. Full topological protection can only emerge in interacting systems and requires the presence of long-range entanglement, which is at the origin of intrinsic topological order. However, topological properties protected by symmetries emerge even in noninteracting systems and, perhaps surprisingly, can be described within the framework of good old band theory of solids. Systems belonging to this category are generically called topological insulators, after the class of materials that is largely responsible for the recent surge in research activity on topological matter. In addition, topological band theory considerations can also be applied to superconductors (and superfluids), as described at the mean-field level using Bogoliubov-de Gennes theory. This chapter summaries the key ideas behind the topological classification of noninteracting systems and discusses the basic properties of various classes of topological insulators and superconductors. For in-depth discussions and related developments the reader is referred to a number of books [48, 402, 153] and review papers [211, 212, 357, 22] specifically dedicated to this subject.
T HE CLASSIFICATION OF DISTINCT PHASES OF MATTER is a central theme in condensed matter physics. A phase of matter can be viewed as an equivalence class of physical states that share a certain set of properties. In the case of topological quantum matter, these properties are associated with topological invariants that take specific values for each equivalence class. Perturbing a gapped state that corresponds to a given topological phase (i.e., smoothly deforming the Hamiltonian of the system) does not affect the topological invariant, as long as the energy gap remains finite. The value of this invariant changes only if the system undergoes a quantum phase transition, which is signaled by the collapse of the gap. Full topological protection can only emerge in interacting systems and requires the presence of long-range entanglement, which is at the origin of intrinsic topological order. However, topological properties protected by symmetries emerge even in noninteracting systems and, perhaps surprisingly, can be described within the framework of good old band theory of solids. Systems belonging to this category are generically called topological insulators, after the class of materials that is largely responsible for the recent surge in research activity on topological matter. In addition, topological band theory considerations can also be applied to superconductors (and superfluids), as described at the mean-field level using Bogoliubov-de Gennes theory. This chapter summaries the key ideas behind the topological classification of noninteracting systems and discusses the basic properties of various classes of topological insulators and superconductors. For in-depth discussions and related developments the reader is referred to a number of books [48, 402, 153] and review papers [211, 212, 357, 22] specifically dedicated to this subject.
The classification of distinct phases of matter is a central theme in condensed matter physics. A phase of matter can be viewed as an equivalence class of physical states that share a certain set of properties. In the case of topological quantum matter, these properties are associated with topological invariants that take specific values for each equivalence class. Perturbing a gapped state that corresponds to a given topological phase (i.e., smoothly deforming the Hamiltonian of the system) does not affect the topological invariant, as long as the bulk energy gap remains finite. The value of this invariant changes only if the system undergoes a quantum phase transition, which is signaled by the collapse of the gap. Full topological protection can only emerge in interacting systems and requires the presence of long-range entanglement, which is at the origin of intrinsic topological order. However, topological properties protected by symmetries emerge even in noninteracting systems and, perhaps surprisingly, can be described within the framework of good old band theory of solids. Systems belonging to this category are generically called topological insulators, after the class of materials that is largely responsible for the recent surge in research on topological matter. In addition, topological band theory considerations can also be applied to superconductors (and superfluids), as described at the mean-field level using Bogoliubov–de Gennes theory. This chapter summarizes the key ideas behind the topological classification of noninteracting systems and discusses the basic properties of various classes of topological insulators and superconductors. For in-depth discussions and related developments the reader is referred to a number of books [ 54 , 175 , 469 ] and review papers [ 23 , 239 , 240 , 421 ] specifically dedicated to this subject.
Topological insulators and superconductors are subsets of (almost) noninteracting symmetry protected topological (SPT) phases. More generally, SPT phases represent equivalence classes of (equilibrium) gapped quantum states with short-range entanglement that are protected by certain symmetries. Two quantum states are “equivalent” if they can be adiabatically deformed into one another without closing the bulk gap. Thus, quantum states belonging to different SPT phases cannot be smoothly deformed into each other without a phase transition, as long as the underlying symmetry is preserved. However, upon removing the symmetry all SPT states can be adiabatically deformed to a trivial product state (e.g., an atomic insulator) without undergoing a phase transition. In this chapter, we generalize our discussion of (almost) noninteracting topological states by removing some of the explicit and implicit constraints underlying the classification and properties of topological insulators and superconductors discussed in Chapter 3 . In Section 4.1 , we enlarge the type of symmetries that protect the topological phases by supplementing internal symmetries (e.g., time-reversal and particle-hole symmetries) with crystalline symmetries (e.g., mirror and rotation symmetries) and discuss topological crystalline insulators and superconductors , a subsets of SPT phases protected by internal and crystalline symmetries. In Section 4.2 , we remove the requirement of having a finite (bulk) gap and discuss Weyl semimetals – crystalline systems characterized by topologically protected bulk band degeneracy points separated in momentum space, which support low energy excitations that are massless chiral fermions, i.e., Weyl fermions. Finally, in Section 4.3 , we remove the condition of thermodynamic equilibrium and consider topological quantum states in periodically driven systems, focusing on the so-called Floquet topological insulators , which exhibit a richer topological structure than their static counterparts. We note that aspects regarding the effects of particle-particle interactions, including the emergence of topological order in systems with long-range entanglement, will be addressed in Chapter 5 . We also point out that the areas summarized in this chapter have grown tremendously in recent years and continue to grow; even a brief mentioning of all recent developments would be impossible within the constraints of a book chapter. Instead, we point out the key elements that determine the nontrivial topology of the quantum systems mentioned above, discuss specific manifestations of their topological properties (e.g., the presence of protected gapless states), and provide representative examples.
What theoretical approaches are appropriate for describing topological quantum matter? The answer depends on the type of topological phase we want to study, e.g., noninteracting or interacting, and on the type of information we are interested in, e.g., generic properties or system-specific properties that are relevant to a particular experiment or type of experiment. Noninteracting topological phases can be described within topological band theory using the basic tools of the band theory of solids. However, the complexity of the model, i.e., how much detail has to be included, depends on whether we are only interested in the topological properties of the system or, in addition, we need to consider certain non-topological features. For example, predicting whether or not a specific material is a topological insulator requires detailed knowledge of its band structure, which can be acquired using density functional theory (DFT) methods. Similar treatments may be required to account for certain experimental features involving both topological and nontopological contributions. On the other hand, to understand the classification of topological insulators, it is sufficient to consider “bare bone” effective models, such as continuum Dirac models or simple tight-binding models. Topologically, these descriptions with extremely different levels of complexity are equivalent whenever one can smoothly connect the corresponding Hamiltonians (up to the addition/subtraction of trivial bands) without closing the bulk gap. However, the effective models provide only a crude description of experimentally relevant properties such as energy gaps, band dispersion, and real space properties of boundary states. In some sense, the situation is analogous to the characterization of a given mathematical object within topology, which only deals with properties that are robust against deformations, and geometry, which accounts for properties described by distances, angles, and shapes.
W HAT THEORETICAL APPROACHES ARE APPROPRIATE for describing topological quantum matter? The answer depends on the type of topological phase we want to study, e.g., non-interacting or interacting, and on the type of information we are interested in, e.g., system-specific properties in the case of a theory designed to provide support for a particular experiment or type of experiment. Non-interacting topological phases can be described within topological band theory using the basic tools of the band theory of solids. However, the complexity of the model, i.e., how much detail has to be included, depends on whether we are only interested in the topological properties of the system or, in addition, we need to consider certain nontopological features. For example, predicting whether or not a specific material is a topological insulator requires detailed knowledge of its band structure, which can be acquired using density functional theory (DFT) methods. Similar treatments may be required to account for certain experimental features involving both topological and non-topological contributions. On the other hand, to understand the classification of topological insulators, it is sufficient to consider “bare bone” effective models, such as continuum Dirac models or simple tight-binding models. Topologically, these descriptions with extremely different levels of complexity are equivalent whenever one can smoothly connect the corresponding Hamiltonians (up to the addition/subtraction of trivial bands) without closing the insulating gap. However, the effective models provide only a crude description of experimentally relevant properties such as energy gaps, band dispersion, and real space properties of boundary states. In some sense, the situation is analogous to the characterization of a given mathematical object within topology, which only deals with properties that are robust against deformations, and geometry, which accounts for properties described by distances, angles, and shapes.
Quantum states of matter at zero temperature are called quantum phases, which are characterized by their symmetries and topology. If two quantum phases cannot be related by symmetry-preserving continuous transformations, they are defined to be topologically distinct. The zero-temperature transitions among quantum phases are quantum phase transitions. Quantum phase transitions that happen among topologically distinct phases are called topological quantum phase transitions. The study of topological quantum phases and topological quantum phase transitions is a central topic in condensed matter physics.My research on quantum phases has been focused on the theoretical study of topologically nontrivial quantum phases in the crystals governed by non-interacting Hamiltonians, including topological insulator phases, topological semimetal phases, topological superconductor phases, and so on. First, we proposed a sufficient criterion that can efficiently determine whether a three-dimensional crystal is a topological semimetal or not, based on the compatibility of different expressions for a special topological invariant, the quantized bulk average value of the effective axion field. Second, we predicted the existence of various topological insulator phases and topological semimetal phases in half-Heusler materials. Third, we proposed the magnetic-resonance-induced current as a feasible experimental probe of a special kind of topological insulators, called the axion insulators. Fourth, we proposed a new pairing mixing mechanism, the singlet-quintet mixing, for superconductors with spin-3/2 fermions, demonstrated the topological superconductor phase induced by it, and studied various properties of it, including spin-susceptibility, upper critical field, stability against the disorder, and surface Majorana flat bands.Besides the topological quantum phases, I have also worked on quantum phase transitions. First, we constructed the first theoretical model for the emergent supersymmetry at a discontinuous quantum phase transition and proposed to realize it on the surface of a topological superconductor. Second, we proposed the discontinuous change of piezoelectricity as a probe of two-dimensional topological quantum phase transitions between insulating phases, through a systematic study of all the relevant gap closing cases. In this dissertation, I first briefly introduce the basic concepts in the field of topological quantum phases and topological quantum phase transitions with a focus on the crystals governed by noninteracting Hamiltonians. Then, I review in detail all my first-authored research works mentioned above. My other research works are briefly mentioned.
Topological phases are quantum phases of matter that appear close to absolute zero temperature. In contrast to commonly known condensed phases of matter, such as a magnet or a superconductor, distinct topological phases may have the same symmetry. Instead, these phases are distinguished by the topology of the electronic wavefunction. Already the single-particle excitations described by band theory in an insulator or a metal or by Bogoliubov-de Gennes theory in a superconductor may have novel anomalous properties associated to their topology. This topological band theory is the subject of this thesis. We aim towards identifying the anomalous boundary and defect states associated to the topology of the band structure in crystalline insulators and superconductors. Furthermore, we determine criteria to easily identify the topological phases from the band structure of a given insulator or superconductor. In Chapter 2 we show that crystalline topological insulators and superconductors may host anomalous gapless or in-gap excitations on corners of a two-dimensional crystal or hinges of a three-dimensional crystal. These topological phases are called "second-order" according to the codimension "2" of their anomalous boundary states. We discuss the precise conditions for their appearance and when they can be linked to the bulk topology. Our discussion includes mirror, twofold-rotation and inversion as crystalline symmetries. In Chapter 3 we discuss the appearance of anomalous gapless or ingap states at defects in a crystalline insulator or superconductor. In particular, we link the existence of anomalous states at disclinations -- lattice defects that violate a rotation symmetry only locally -- to second-order topological crystalline phases. As a side product, we identify the possible contributions of other topological phases to the disclination anomaly. The results of this chapter allow to determine precisely how the disclination anomaly is linked to the bulk topology. In Chapter 4 we present how to construct "symmetry-based indicators" for topological superconductors that admit a description within the Bogoliubov-de Gennes framework. Symmetry-based indicators are necessary criteria for a given Bogoliubov-de Gennes Hamiltonian to realize a topological crystalline phase with anomalous boundary exitations. These criteria are formulated in terms of data from a small set of high-symmetry momenta only. Our approach guarantees to extract the maximal information on the anomalous boundary exitations that can be extracted from a point-wise evaluation of the Bogoliubov-de Gennes Hamiltonian. In the limit of weak superconducting pairing, our criteria can be formulated in terms of data from the normal-state band structure alone.